A real photographer like Ansel Adams hiked all the way into those mountains and took one perfect shot and hiked home to glory.
BobSchwabk wrote:
A question for the group.
As I look at on-line posts of images, I see some that obviously been created by adding features that weren’t in the original capture. But with the advent of AI it’s getting harder. With all the editing software out there, many adding features for enhancing an image, I’m curious as to your opinions as to when an image transitions from a photo into the realm of “digital art”. What will be the impact on competitions?
Many lines are already blurred. More are getting blurred each day. Some have been erased.
At some point you have to decide whether you are a photographer or a computer graphics technician.
Beauty is everywhere when you have PhotoShop.
In the film days, I spent hours on a balcony overlooking Biscayne Bay, waiting for a plane, queueing to land at Miami International, to go through a rising full moon. One fine evening it happened! With my FM2 loaded with Ektar 125, shutter speed 1/125, 1000mm Nikkor Reflex, I anticipated the 727 approaching, clicked just before, and saw the plane just after the swish-clunk of the mirror. "I think I got it!" I whispered, to no one there. Weeks later, when I finished the roll and had it processed, sure enough, the jet was almost half-way through the moon, the jet-trails clearly showing! I printed it myself, and, much later, photographed the print with my D5100 so I could share it on-line with some friends. Wouldn't you know, one of them dismissed it with, "Photoshop"...
fantom wrote:
Cheaters will cheat and feel proud of themselves. Artists and honest photogs will feel something else.
Cheaters? That is an interesting way of defining a new tool. Artists will and have always adopted whatever device to create their work. The only rules in art are the ones that are intelligently broken.
When you follow the rules, you are a photographer, when you break the rules you are an artist.
jlg1000
Loc: Uruguay / South America
CHG_CANON wrote:
No artist ever sees things only as the camera would. If he did, he would cease to be an artist.
Agreed.
And don't forget that AI doesn't have mirrors...
In my opinion, once you do anything more than adjust exposure and start placing elements not there, it is not a photograph it is an image. Difference between capturing and creating.
Real Photographers use Polaroid.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.