Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon tc-14 II 1.4 teleconverter
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 30, 2022 16:07:28   #
cascom Loc: Redmond
 
roadenphotos wrote:
I don't recommend a tele converter on any zoom lens. Great for prime lens


I beg to differ. I use the AFS 70-200mm 2.8 Nikon FLED lens with a TC-17e 1.7 ON A D500 body. The photo was taken from across the field in the rain. Game-winning TD. ISO 25600 1/800 F4.8



Reply
Oct 30, 2022 16:24:08   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
cascom wrote:
I beg to differ. I use the AFS 70-200mm 2.8 Nikon FLED lens with a TC-17e 1.7 ON A D500 body. The photo was taken from across the field in the rain. Game-winning TD. ISO 25600 1/800 F4.8


Would you also recommend buying a product that is physically incompatible with the OP's zoom lenses?

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 16:39:51   #
cascom Loc: Redmond
 
My comment was about using an extender with a zoom lens. I have both 300 and 400mm 2.8 glass but have found the zoom and a extender give me wider coverage. I would expect problems with generic substitions and with incompatible zoom lenses. I also found that older worn TC-17 extenders tend to have problems focusing.

Reply
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Oct 30, 2022 17:56:34   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
KenProspero wrote:
Fair enough -- this was with a Nikon z-5/ftz


So, the OP has a DSLR and you have a mirror less - BIG difference as regards AF with TC !

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 17:59:00   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
From personal experience, TC's with f2.8 and f4 constant aperture zooms can be very, very good !

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 18:04:13   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
billnikon wrote:
A Nikon 1.4 teleconverter will not work on your lens. And that's a good thing considering that teleconverters have never increased sharpness of any lens. Personally I would work on learning how to get physically closer to your subject.
PS. A good used Nikon 200-500 should not cost too much more than a new Nikon 1.4 and will deliver much better sharpness.


I agree Bill. I use my 200-500 coupled with Nikon D4 and managed to get very nice quality.
good advice for the poster.

Reply
Oct 30, 2022 18:21:27   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Jules Karney wrote:
I agree Bill. I use my 200-500 coupled with Nikon D4 and managed to get very nice quality.
good advice for the poster.


Thanks for your kind words.

Reply
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Oct 30, 2022 22:25:23   #
KenProspero
 
imagemeister wrote:
So, the OP has a DSLR and you have a mirror less - BIG difference as regards AF with TC !


We have no disagreement here -- before buying any TC, one should research to make sure it will work with the lens-body combination you'll be using.

Reply
Oct 31, 2022 04:32:44   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
whatdat wrote:
I am considering (for budget reasons) getting a Nikon tc-14 II 1.4 teleconverter to use on a Nikon 18-300 af-s lens….


I have a Bower Canon 2X Teleconverter. It was an impulse buy and I use it sometimes. Fortunately, I have a 70-300mm and really don’t need the extra weight of a 600mm lens.

Reply
Oct 31, 2022 14:07:06   #
Drbobcameraguy Loc: Eaton Ohio
 
whatdat wrote:
I am considering (for budget reasons) getting a Nikon tc-14 II 1.4 teleconverter to use on a Nikon 18-300 af-s lens on my d7500 for extra reach. Possibly on my Tamron 18-270 af-s lens on my d7000 as well. Would appreciate any thoughts & advice. Thanks.


Kind of a bad idea on a f5.6 lens and a DSLR. If you have any f4 or larger aperture lens or a mirror less camera then yes it is a fair idea.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.