Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Opinion of Nikon D800
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jul 9, 2022 10:38:24   #
bikinkawboy Loc: north central Missouri
 
Thanks for the input! It came with the battery grip and extra battery. Kinds of adds to the bulk of the camera though, but I don’t have to use it I guess.

I’ll have to do some shooting with it today. Thanks for everyone’s input!

Reply
Jul 9, 2022 11:34:12   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
A. T. wrote:
Nikon D4s has outstanding high ISO performance. I have a D500 and a D850 and although I absolutely love EVERYTHING about my D850, it can't compete with the D4s in terns of low light high ISO performance.


Although I agree with your assessment completely, that has absolutely nothing to do with the OPs question! Best of luck.

Reply
Jul 9, 2022 13:09:43   #
lensmaster Loc: Chicago
 
I have Nikon D800's. both are my Go-To bodies for studio work, and they are terrific on location.
Large file size is a Plus. Greater tonal range than the Canons, incredibly sharp image files.

Camera 'movement"? Not if you hold it steady, use a tripod or monopod.

The Nikon D800 is not really great for SPORTS unless you just shoot in JPEG mode. RAW files will fill the buffer/cache up fast if you are shooting a lot of frames quickly. 20-30 frames in rapid succession will force the camera to pause while all the files are processed. I've tried it and I speak from experience on this.

$500 for the body is a gift and 40k exposures is nothing since the shutter is rated for over 200,000.
I would have it checked out by a Nikon Repair (authorized Nikon Repair is just fine), and have it completely cleaned once you get it.

Reply
 
 
Jul 9, 2022 13:35:22   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
bikinkawboy wrote:
There’s a D800 for sale locally for $500 with 40k shots. Any opinions from you folks with experience?

My research has shown negatives such as large files taking up computer space and slow to download, slight movement resulting in blurry images, noise at higher ISOs and slow frames per second rate. But otherwise really good image quality.

I have DX now with both DX and FX lenses. I’d like something with good low light capabilities for night shots, lightning, street scenes, etc. any opinions? Thanks!
There’s a D800 for sale locally for $500 with 40k ... (show quote)


Still have and use one of my D800s regularly. If you want the resolution of a D800, files will be large. Slight movement makes any camera take blurry images. Downsampling (taking a full 36mp image and resampling it to 12 mp, like a D700 or 24 mp like a D750) will reveal things about noise and blur that are not immediately obvious. It shoots 5 fps which is probably twice as fast as the last motor driven SLR I had.

The one thing you didn't mention was lens quality. The D800 was a game changer. Until then cameras had much lower resolution and were generally ok with less-than-optimal lenses. A lot of lenses that were fine on a 12 mp D700 often couldn't cut it on a 36 mp D800.

That cuts both ways. To get the most out of a D800 (or higher MP camera), one must get the sharpest lenses. The obvious benefit there is that your pictures will be sharper. . .

Reply
Jul 9, 2022 13:40:26   #
lensmaster Loc: Chicago
 
ABSOLUTELY. LENS CHOICE and quality make big differences with a camera like the D800.

You want to use the best glass you have, or can get. Any major lens brand: NIKON, TAMRON, SIGMA will perform perfectly and give excellent results. Low end glass will work but the results could be sub-par due to the high resolution and file size of the chip in the camera. If you shoot RAW you really need the best glass you can afford.

Reply
Jul 9, 2022 15:14:44   #
bikinkawboy Loc: north central Missouri
 
I got the camera and it looks very clean. It came with the extra battery grip, Tamron XR Di 38-75 2.8 lens, charger and 8g cf card. The fellow said he bought an 850 and didn’t need this one any more. I believe that was a pretty good buy. He knew all about the controls and other specifics, so I believe he was on the up and up and it wasn’t stolen or anything. And it is a US model.

Been working on my shop addition right now and haven’t had a chance to shoot it outside of the house. I need to take it for a test run!

And what’s the difference between the SD and CF cards other than physical shape and cost? Is one better to use than the other? Thanks!

Reply
Jul 9, 2022 15:56:10   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
bikinkawboy wrote:
There’s a D800 for sale locally for $500 with 40k shots. Any opinions from you folks with experience?

My research has shown negatives such as large files taking up computer space and slow to download, slight movement resulting in blurry images, noise at higher ISOs and slow frames per second rate. But otherwise really good image quality.

I have DX now with both DX and FX lenses. I’d like something with good low light capabilities for night shots, lightning, street scenes, etc. any opinions? Thanks!
There’s a D800 for sale locally for $500 with 40k ... (show quote)


I pre-ordered the D800E when the pair were first announced. I was blown away by its images immediately. After 6 months I bought a D800 as a backup and the image quality was well below the E model so I sold it with under 1000 clicks. It wasn't until the D850 that I saw any imporvements over the D800E in ANY camera model. I shoot the Z7 and Z9 bodies now, but never leave home without the 800E and 850 in tow.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.