A Covid stat no one is reporting (Page 2): Everyone is God’s child but that doesn’t mean the homosexual lifestyle isn’t a sin. Its a chosen lifestyle. People choose to sin and that...

Rose42

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

Only in the eyes of the authors of the Bible. br ... (show quote)

Everyone is God’s child but that doesn’t mean the homosexual lifestyle isn’t a sin. Its a chosen lifestyle. People choose to sin and that lifestyle is no different.

Racism and “homophobia” formes of domestic terror? Oh my, more bad propaganda.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

Rose42 wrote:

Everyone is God’s child but that doesn’t mean the homosexual lifestyle isn’t a sin. Its a chosen lifestyle. People choose to sin and that lifestyle is no different.

Racism and “homophobia” formes of domestic terror? Oh my, more bad propaganda.

I definitely have no personal knowledge but being a homosexual is not a chosen lifestyle.

anotherview Loc: California

This report comes close: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/30/cdc-study-shows-74percent-of-people-infected-in-massachusetts-covid-outbreak-were-fully-vaccinated.html

I say more importantly, the news media typists should clearly describe the most vulnerable to hospitalization and death from the Chinese killer virus: Old folk, ill folk, the obese, and diabetics.

Meanwhile, generally, the unvaccinated crowd accounts for nearly all cases of hospitalization and death from the killer virus and its variant.

The alarmist news media typists could also state in plain terms that less that 2 percent of the U.S. population has died from the killer virus, with most of these deaths occurring among the cohort noted above.

Tex-s wrote:

I only devoted a couple of minutes to Google, and ... (show quote)

Tex-s

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

First, please select the " b Quote Reply /b &... (show quote)

The point is not about alternative services and you know it. It’s about power grabbing and pushing narratives. When churches are forcibly closed and BLM riots get positive (Covid related, mind) press on the same day, you know it is big political theater and has absolutely zero to do with ‘science’.

cwp3420

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

Only in the eyes of the authors of the Bible. br ... (show quote)

Yes I have gay friends too. Very nice people. God doesn’t hate them either, but he hates their sin. There’s a difference, but probably not one you could understand. And God really doesn’t care about your opinion. He never changes, and says in Leviticus 20:13- If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death.

btbg

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

No, they didn't supress religion, they limited ALL in person gatherings during the shutdown.

It is unconstitutional to limit the right to assemble and the right to freedom of religion. Duh!!!

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Frank T wrote:

Put your faith in god if you want, but isn't he also responsible for the virus?

Nope! Fauci and the GD Chinese are.

SteveR Loc: Michigan

Frank T wrote:

Put your faith in god if you want, but isn't he also responsible for the virus?

He did put the curse of death on all mankind in response to Adam's sin. Jesus Christ is the Second Adam, God's deliverance from death.

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

btbg wrote:

It is unconstitutional to limit the right to assemble and the right to freedom of religion. Duh!!!

You appear to be wrong.

https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1777/coronavirus-and-the-first-amendment

https://firstamendmentwatch.org/limitations-on-gathering-size-to-slow-spread-of-coronavirus-prompts-first-amendment-questions/

https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/blog/covid-19-and-the-constitution-key-takeaways

Tex-s

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

You appear to be wrong.

https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1777/coronavirus-and-the-first-amendment

https://firstamendmentwatch.org/limitations-on-gathering-size-to-slow-spread-of-coronavirus-prompts-first-amendment-questions/

https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/blog/covid-19-and-the-constitution-key-takeaways

Interesting reads, particularly noting that in varied language each article admits that banning assembly IS a violation of rights. The workaround being that the violations get justified/allowed by declaring a ‘crisis’. Declaring, not proving. Government or government agency first declares themselves capable of declaring an emergency then does so. The people end up constrained by the personal whims of unelected, unaccountable actors. That alone should prevent this method of action.

My thought is that “15 days to slow the spread” becoming, in some cases, 500 days indicates the Dr Fauci’s and Gretchen Whimer’s of the world have both lied to the public and been seduced by the power they have accumulated at the expense of the supposedly guaranteed liberties of the people.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Tex-s wrote:

Interesting reads, particularly noting that in var... (show quote)

Does the school buy your tin foil, or do you have to buy your own?

anotherview Loc: California

The teachings of the Jews and the Muslims contain very similar direction. But the Jews and the Christians have reformed their religions. The Muslims have not.

Muslims continue to throw homosexuals off a high place to die from striking the pavement below. If the victim does not die from the impact, then the crowd stones the survivor to death.

Islam functions as a retrograde religion.

cwp3420 wrote:

Yes I have gay friends too. Very nice people. God doesn’t hate them either, but he hates their sin. There’s a difference, but probably not one you could understand. And God really doesn’t care about your opinion. He never changes, and says in Leviticus 20:13- If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death.

SteveR Loc: Michigan

cwp3420 wrote:

Yes I have gay friends too. Very nice people. God doesn’t hate them either, but he hates their sin. There’s a difference, but probably not one you could understand. And God really doesn’t care about your opinion. He never changes, and says in Leviticus 20:13- If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death.

Both in the Old Testament and the New Testament, God's position on homosexuality is made clear. However, Leviticus was part of the Law that was given to the Jews. Jesus fulfilled the Law. Christians are no longer under the Law. Jesus brought in a higher Law (Matthew 5). The command to execute homosexuals is not in effect for the Church. You might also note that there was a command to execute children who were overly disobedient to their parents, but there is no record that this law was ever carried out.

anotherview Loc: California

I add that Iran, a Muslim nation, hangs individuals afflicted with homosexuality, in accord with Islamic law.

anotherview wrote:

The teachings of the Jews and the Muslims contain very similar direction. But the Jews and the Christians have reformed their religions. The Muslims have not.

Muslims continue to throw homosexuals off a high place to die from striking the pavement below. If the victim does not die from the impact, then the crowd stones the survivor to death.

Islam functions as a retrograde religion.

btbg

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

You appear to be wrong.

https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1777/coronavirus-and-the-first-amendment

https://firstamendmentwatch.org/limitations-on-gathering-size-to-slow-spread-of-coronavirus-prompts-first-amendment-questions/

https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/blog/covid-19-and-the-constitution-key-takeaways

I'm not wrong. Those leftist "experts" are wrong. The Constitution is very clear.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Note, the right to peaceably assemble is absolutely in there. And, using the argument that assembly can be restricted by executive order flies totally in the face of the intent of the constitution as it was put there to ensure individual rights and make sure that we didn't have dictatorial government.

Perhaps you should read the original text instead of going along with individuals who do not believe in the U.S. Constitution and seek to destroy it.