Anytime. Interesting. Its part of the latest lockdown.
Rose42 wrote:
Anytime. Interesting. Its part of the latest lockdown.
Notes are being taken by Democrats for a new US policy the idiot pervert Mr. Biden to try reading at a so called news conference before he scurries back to his hole.
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
Rose42 wrote:
Anytime. Interesting. Its part of the latest lockdown.
Look here lady u really need to stop reading those conspiracy sites.......
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
We are in trouble, but you watch how many sheeple will support it of it does come to the US.
I won’t be surprised if it does.
soba1 wrote:
Look here lady u really need to stop reading those conspiracy sites.......
Lol. Crazy times we live in. They are also encouraging people to snitch.
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
Rose42 wrote:
Lol. Crazy times we live in. They are also encouraging people to snitch.
1984 young lady 1984.....
Yes it is and the party is just starting.
soba1 wrote:
1984 young lady 1984.....
Yes it is and the party is just starting.
It sure looks like it. But we know who wins in the end.
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
Rose42 wrote:
It sure looks like it. But we know who wins in the end.
Yes we do sister; yes we do
soba1 wrote:
We are in trouble, but you watch how many sheeple will support it of it does come to the US.
I won’t be surprised if it does.
They have tried to do it to Florida already.
Rose42 wrote:
It sure looks like it. But we know who wins in the end.
Big Trump triumphs at the end of 1984. It's dire.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
As a resident of Ontario I don't see this as a problem. The law says to stay home, so if you are out on the road you MAY be breaking the law. If there is a bone to be picked it is with the stay at home order, not the authorization for police to stop you. BTW, this is not the first time this has been implemented in Ontario, so nothing new, really.
I don't expect it will affect me in the slightest... because for the most part I follow the rules. And I believe the stay at home orders make sense... because a bunch of idiots don't know how to follow the rules that were in place BEFORE the strict stay at home orders!!! These idiots bring it upon themselves as well as others. And some of these idiots are close friends. And yes, I have told them they are idiots for not following the rules!
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
JohnFrim wrote:
As a resident of Ontario I don't see this as a problem. The law says to stay home, so if you are out on the road you MAY be breaking the law. If there is a bone to be picked it is with the stay at home order, not the authorization for police to stop you. BTW, this is not the first time this has been implemented in Ontario, so nothing new, really.
I don't expect it will affect me in the slightest... because for the most part I follow the rules. And I believe the stay at home orders make sense... because a bunch of idiots don't know how to follow the rules that were in place BEFORE the strict stay at home orders!!! These idiots bring it upon themselves as well as others. And some of these idiots are close friends. And yes, I have told them they are idiots for not following the rules!
As a resident of Ontario I don't see this as a pro... (
show quote)
You either live in a free country or you don't. Take your pick--a country who controls your every move. or a country where you can go anywhere you want. any time you want. I choose the latter.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
boberic wrote:
You either live in a free country or you don't. Take your pick--a country who controls your every move. or a country where you can go anywhere you want. any time you want. I choose the latter.
You conveniently accept certain rules/laws/regulations while complaining about others. As a simple example, many countries do not have speed limits on some of their roads; yet you think it is OK to limit your speed in America. Did you object when back in the late 70s the speed limits were reduced to 55? More importantly, did you obey the law back then?
You undoubtedly have accepted body scans and luggage X-rays at airport, as well as limits to the import of goods from abroad when you travel (e.g., alcohol and goods value limits for different lengths of time out of country). I have not heard you complain about different "age of majority" regulations between states. At one time the legal voting age was 21; did you accept that when you were younger?
The current COVID restrictions are not even like the examples I gave above in that these are temporary measures designed to get the country back to "normal" faster. I have no problem with that. I still believe and feel that I live in a free country.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.