Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Polarizer
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 20, 2021 15:13:27   #
dparker708
 
Can anyone recommend a good circular polarizer for my Canon 24-70 lens?

Reply
Mar 20, 2021 15:17:44   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
dparker708 wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good circular polarizer for my Canon 24-70 lens?


Hoya from B&H

Reply
Mar 20, 2021 15:18:55   #
Real Nikon Lover Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
Heliopan

Reply
 
 
Mar 20, 2021 15:36:09   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
B+W XS-Pro Kaesemann High Transmission Circular Polarizer MRC-Nano Filter. None better.
--Bob
dparker708 wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good circular polarizer for my Canon 24-70 lens?

Reply
Mar 20, 2021 16:06:32   #
E.L.. Shapiro Loc: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
 
rmalarz wrote:
B+W XS-Pro Kaesemann High Transmission Circular Polarizer MRC-Nano Filter. None better.
--Bob


Exactly!

No strange color shifts, extremely well crafted, solid metal rim, and will provide many years of service.

Reply
Mar 20, 2021 16:21:39   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
rmalarz wrote:
B+W XS-Pro Kaesemann High Transmission Circular Polarizer MRC-Nano Filter. None better.
--Bob

Cost????

Reply
Mar 20, 2021 16:37:04   #
tradio Loc: Oxford, Ohio
 
rmalarz wrote:
B+W XS-Pro Kaesemann High Transmission Circular Polarizer MRC-Nano Filter. None better.
--Bob


That's the one I use and I'm happy with it.

Reply
 
 
Mar 20, 2021 18:43:11   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
dparker708 wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good circular polarizer for my Canon 24-70 lens?


B+W F-Pro or XS-Pro... Best value in a top quality C-Pol!

You probably need an 82mm for that lens (earlier version of it used 77mm).

$137 for a B+W F-pro 82mm C-Pol. This filter uses German Schott glass, Kaesemann design (foils and weather sealing), and uses a relatively low profile brass frame (less likely to get stuck). It's a "high transmissive" type of C-Pol, which isn't as dark as most and allows approx. 3/4 stop more light to pass. The F-Pro also has very good 8-layer multi-coatings.

$143 B+W XS-Pro is the same in all specs, except it uses a "slim" frame (not necessary on a 24mm lens, the F-Pro works fine on my Canon 24-70mm, even though it uses the 77mm). More importantly, the XS-Pro has 16-layer "Nano" multi-coating that's more resistant to water, oil and scratches. It makes the filter easier to clean, compared to standard multi-coatings.

Compare to....

Heliopan 82mm High Transmission C-Pol with virtually identical specs as XS-Pro.... $241 (choice of standard or slim)

Sony T* (Zeiss?) 82mm C-Pol... $228

Hoya 82mm HD3 C-Pol... $224

Heliopan 82mm C-Pol (not High Trans)... $220 (choice of standard or slim)

Zeiss T* 82mm C-Pol... $203

Nikon 82mm C-Pol II... $179

Hoya 82mm EVO Antistatic C-Pol... $170

Hoya 82mm NXT C-Pol... $150

Yes, there are also some less expensive than B+W, but they are typically lower spec or a company I don't recognize.

I've used B+W filters for many years (also Hoya and others). I'm happy with them and they are still my first choice most of the time. But just for fun I recently bought a couple K&F Concept C-Pol to see what they're like (43mm and 72mm). Supposedly the "green" version I bought also uses Schott glass and has 18-layer "Nano" multi-coating. They aren't "high transmissive" and don't use Kaesemann foils (which I think may be exclusive to B+W). I don't know if they are sealed for weather resistance and the frame is slim, but aluminum. But, by being made in China they're CHEAP! B&H Photo has them in 82mm size for $50! (I bought direct from China for even less, but it took a few weeks to get them here.) I haven't used these K&F filters enough to say how good of bad they are, or to be able to truly recommend them... So if you decide to give them a try, you're buying at your own risk! I can tell you they LOOK decent (no problems with stiff rotation or threading onto lenses, with on the ones I got). We'll have to wait and see how a bunch images done with them look...That's what's important, after all. They are just about the least expensive multi-coated CPL anyone makes with Schott glass.

Reply
Mar 20, 2021 19:29:07   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
rmalarz wrote:
B+W XS-Pro Kaesemann High Transmission Circular Polarizer MRC-Nano Filter. None better.
--Bob


I bought a 95mm polarizer the other day. This one was $490.00. I bought the cheap one,

B + W Circular Polarizer Kaesemann - Standard Mount (F-PRO), HTC, 16 Layers Multi-Resistant Coating, Photography Filter, 95 mm for only $160.00.


---

Reply
Mar 21, 2021 06:22:45   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
dparker708 wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good circular polarizer for my Canon 24-70 lens?


Tiffen, Hoya make very good inexpensive Polarizer's.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=tiffen%20circular%20polarizing%20filter&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&sts=ma

Reply
Mar 21, 2021 06:51:23   #
In-lightened Loc: Kansas City
 
amfoto1 wrote:
B+W F-Pro or XS-Pro... Best value in a top quality C-Pol!

You probably need an 82mm for that lens (earlier version of it used 77mm).

$137 for a B+W F-pro 82mm C-Pol. This filter uses German Schott glass, Kaesemann design (foils and weather sealing), and uses a relatively low profile brass frame (less likely to get stuck). It's a "high transmissive" type of C-Pol, which isn't as dark as most and allows approx. 3/4 stop more light to pass. The F-Pro also has very good 8-layer multi-coatings.

$143 B+W XS-Pro is the same in all specs, except it uses a "slim" frame (not necessary on a 24mm lens, the F-Pro works fine on my Canon 24-70mm, even though it uses the 77mm). More importantly, the XS-Pro has 16-layer "Nano" multi-coating that's more resistant to water, oil and scratches. It makes the filter easier to clean, compared to standard multi-coatings.

Compare to....

Heliopan 82mm High Transmission C-Pol with virtually identical specs as XS-Pro.... $241 (choice of standard or slim)

Sony T* (Zeiss?) 82mm C-Pol... $228

Hoya 82mm HD3 C-Pol... $224

Heliopan 82mm C-Pol (not High Trans)... $220 (choice of standard or slim)

Zeiss T* 82mm C-Pol... $203

Nikon 82mm C-Pol II... $179

Hoya 82mm EVO Antistatic C-Pol... $170

Hoya 82mm NXT C-Pol... $150

Yes, there are also some less expensive than B+W, but they are typically lower spec or a company I don't recognize.

I've used B+W filters for many years (also Hoya and others). I'm happy with them and they are still my first choice most of the time. But just for fun I recently bought a couple K&F Concept C-Pol to see what they're like (43mm and 72mm). Supposedly the "green" version I bought also uses Schott glass and has 18-layer "Nano" multi-coating. They aren't "high transmissive" and don't use Kaesemann foils (which I think may be exclusive to B+W). I don't know if they are sealed for weather resistance and the frame is slim, but aluminum. But, by being made in China they're CHEAP! B&H Photo has them in 82mm size for $50! (I bought direct from China for even less, but it took a few weeks to get them here.) I haven't used these K&F filters enough to say how good of bad they are, or to be able to truly recommend them... So if you decide to give them a try, you're buying at your own risk! I can tell you they LOOK decent (no problems with stiff rotation or threading onto lenses, with on the ones I got). We'll have to wait and see how a bunch images done with them look...That's what's important, after all. They are just about the least expensive multi-coated CPL anyone makes with Schott glass.
B+W F-Pro or XS-Pro... Best value in a top quality... (show quote)


Alan thank you for a thorough overview on CPLs! Could you expand on when a slim profile is needed?
Many thanks!

Reply
 
 
Mar 21, 2021 06:54:13   #
Wanderer2 Loc: Colorado Rocky Mountains
 
dparker708 wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good circular polarizer for my Canon 24-70 lens?


B+W, Marumi, and top of the line Hoya are all excellent. At different times I have used all three and all performed very well and are of excellent build quality. The website LensTip has done comparative reviews of circular polarizers and rated these three brands at the top of the rankings.

Reply
Mar 21, 2021 07:16:26   #
ggenova64
 
dparker708 wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good circular polarizer for my Canon 24-70 lens?


Can’t go wrong with B&W, NiSi or even the Promaster.

Reply
Mar 21, 2021 07:25:47   #
drmike99 Loc: Fairfield Connecticut
 
rmalarz wrote:
B+W XS-Pro Kaesemann High Transmission Circular Polarizer MRC-Nano Filter. None better.
--Bob


Agree. Have several.

Reply
Mar 21, 2021 07:30:00   #
ggenova64
 
rmalarz wrote:
B+W XS-Pro Kaesemann High Transmission Circular Polarizer MRC-Nano Filter. None better.
--Bob

What is High Transmission?

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.