scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

Well Caruso first of all the call you are talking about was asking for assurances of the legality of the vote and to make sure there was no fraud. The story you are talking about has been debunked by Raffensperger himself. But that doesn't matter to you liberal lynch mobs does it. Innocence has no place in your little world. This is almost as sad as the assertion that he pressured the president of Ukraine to invent things on Biden. Even the president of Ukraine said there was no truth to it. But in typical liberal fashion Trump is guilty until proven innocent. Biden is on video bragging about the same thing Trump was accused of doing yet you liberals gave Biden a free pass. The liberal party has morphed into the most un american entity in our government and you liberals own it. Maybe scrutinize your own incredibly corrupt politicians. You just might learn what the rest of us already know. They're scum!

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

"When President Trump allegedly tried firing special prosecutor Robert S. Mueller III, refused to respond to lawful subpoenas during the investigation into the 2016 election and committed the other acts to obstruct justice documented in the Mueller report, he arguably violated his oath, broke the law and committed impeachable conduct.

When he tried to extort Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (“I would like you to do us a favor though …”) to create dirt to use against now President-elect Joe Biden and stonewalled Congress’s demands for evidence, he again violated his oath, engaged in impeachable conduct and broke the law.

In neither case did Republicans recognize the facts before them. In neither case did they act to remove him. That prologue brings us to his telephone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on Saturday.
The Post reports: “President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to ‘find’ enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.” In the call, Trump asked Raffensperger to change the certified vote that was subject to multiple recounts: “So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state.”

Jennifer Rubin
January 4, 2021

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

And again I must state The president of Ukraine reported that there was no "extort". What would it take for you to believe that? From the so called horses mouth. And again per Raffensperger himself Trump wanted to make sure "election transparency, full and transparent audits, and public access". But then again Jennifer Rubin says he's guilty and she knows better than Raffensperger. Again you liberals will think the worst of Trump even though the facts tell a different story. The story about the pres of Ukraine is common knowledge and has been out since the whole B.S. started. Raffensperger is a newer story and is out already also. Why won't you accept the facts?? Facts! I also noticed you did not address the Biden video. Why? He did exactly what you are falsely blaming Trump for. You are so eager to blame all the ills of the world on Trump but give your own corrupt politicians a pass.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Sorry, Jennifer Rubin is the poster child for blind dumb hate for Trump. Her statements are pure lying nonsense. No credibility much like the people who quote her.

National Park

Nonsense. The only person trying to steal the election is Trump with wild conspiracy theories and lies.

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

foodie65

Well in 2016 God put Dump in the White House.
In 2020 God issued a recall.

foodie65

And besides that, she doesn’t work for Faux News

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

Speaking of nonsense. You state your opinion and that's all, your opinion. No facts. Good luck with that.

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

And here you show a "big tech" as fact? Fact: 'big tech' has been proven, and may be prosecuted, to be biased. This bias is fed by the democrat party and them turning their heads to all unethical things 'big tech' has been proven to perpetrate on the american public. They should and maybe will lose their immunity, as they should, if the right outcomes happen. They should not have complete immunity to prosecution. In case you haven't been aware of they are completely biased against conservative voices.

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

Now that is soo cute. Got to make your relatives proud.

foodie65

Unfortunately most of my relatives support Dump

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

So You're the only one that can't spell. But you're liberal so it makes sense.