Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Masks???????????????
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Oct 16, 2020 21:24:02   #
btbg
 
Tex-s wrote:
I don't recall responding to you in the past, so if I offend, please know that is not the intention. You mentioned the efficacy of mask wearing is a long-debated topic, and I agree. However, there is new data from California showing that in 84% of their new-found Covid cases, those infected said they 'always' or 'almost always' wore masks in public. That is quite interesting because it poses a LOT more questions.

1) As a man who regularly downgrades his own alcohol consumption on medical questionnaires, I have to ask how accurate the self-reporting on masks is.

2) Presuming the mask wearing data to be even marginally reliable does the data show mask wearing is not effective?

3) Does it show that mask wearing is over-hyped, and that people are being infected while mask wearing because they are making other risky choices in distancing?

4) Does it suggest people wearing masks are neglecting other measures like hand washing?

5) Does it suggest those who are wearing masks less frequently are also less likely to seek medical attention when symptoms arise?

6) If number 5 is true, does it suggest non-mask infections are less severe?

7) If number 5 or 6 is true, does it suggest that long term mask wearing lowers the immune response and maximizes infection symptomology?

My best guess is that the mask-infection-severity data, ultimately, will show that masking was a mixed bag. My tendency is also to believe that mask vs no mask is absolutely NOT the only axis on which this data operates. I also believe that 'false security' may be just as deadly as 'no protection' as young people who feel their mask wearing makes them 100% safe actually infect the vulnerable at higher rates than those who know they are not 100% safe and avoid contact with the vulnerable.

And finally, I believe the failure of medical and media people to ask these questions is at least as dangerous as any world, national or state leader policy could be or has been.
I don't recall responding to you in the past, so i... (show quote)


I believe that number seven is probably true. There is evidence from older studies that does suggest that mask wearing lowers immunity.

Reply
Oct 16, 2020 21:27:49   #
btbg
 
InfiniteISO wrote:
Smells are transferred by diffusion. I just looked up that aromatic perfume particles range from 30 to 100 microns. COVID is much smaller than this, but it normally travels on respiratory droplets, the smallest of which is about the same size as the perfume. The real point here is that your N95 mask should stop the perfume particles and it doesn't. A surgical mask certainly doesn't. On top of this, if your mask does stop the particles, they're now ON YOUR MASK. If you follow protocols you should take off your mask by the strings. If you remove it to eat, you throw it away and get a new one. You don't use it for several days and throw it on your seat or console while your driving, etc. A mask that is fine enough to be effective is a virus collection and incubation device.

Employees, where I work, are pushing back on mask use by following all protocols, going through 10 to 15 masks a shift.
Smells are transferred by diffusion. I just looke... (show quote)


You have just hit on a key point why mask wearing is ineffective. Most people wear the same mask over and over and seldom wash it. They do indeed become incubators of disease. Not a good thing. Another reason to not wear masks. What you say people in your corporation are doing probably is at least partially effective. Wearing masks the way most people do is not only not effective, it may increase the wearers chances of getting the disease. I know that I washed mine for the first time this month today, and didn't get in hot enough to actually sterilize it. I'm sure that a lot of people do the same thing. They just become incubators.

Reply
Oct 16, 2020 21:29:21   #
btbg
 
lenben wrote:
Masks do not protect you from the virus. Masks help keep someone infected from spreading the virus. Since many cases are asymptomatic, if we all wore effective masks, the case load would decrease. Note also that for those who somehow feel that enforced mask wearing is a violation of their constitutional rights, I have never seen anyone complain about the common sign: "No shoes, no shirt, no service" which has been present for years with no complaint about rights.


That's the right of a business to have standards. That is not the same thing as government dictating behavior.

Reply
 
 
Oct 16, 2020 21:34:42   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
DaveO wrote:
Where have you been that you're just now gaining this hot information?


You all are making a mistake, the CDC said that 70% of those that tested positive wore masks.

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 01:39:07   #
cwp3420
 
DennyT wrote:
Pure political spin and misinterpretation of CDC.


From the CDC after they saw so many fools spin the data to support their political side.

A recent
@CDCMMWR
looking at exposures among people w/ and w/o #COVID19 also assessed rates of mask use. However, the interpretation that more mask-wearers are getting infected compared to non-mask wearers is incorrect.



Let’s end this nonesense before more people die because of it.


When did you get your MD, Dr. Denny?

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 05:03:23   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
letmedance wrote:
You all are making a mistake, the CDC said that 70% of those that tested positive wore masks.


The point was the masks were not advertised to protect the wearer.

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 08:52:44   #
Rose42
 
DaveO wrote:
The point was the masks were not advertised to protect the wearer.


People seem to forget about also the social distancing and basic hygiene like washing hands. All three are needed. There's no point in wearing a mask if you don't wear them properly and most I see don't. So its useless if you're wearing one and have the virus, touch your face then touch a bunch of surfaces thus passing it on to others. The mask nazis forget about the little things. Lol

I wear one when needed but never outside.

Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2020 09:29:23   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
boberic wrote:
There is growing evidence that the wearing masks don't prevent covid infection. Turn out, accordin to the CDC over70% of mask wearers got covid any way. There is also evidence that lockdowns do more harm than good, as the risk for those under 70 is the same as yearly flu.


I'd like to see the study that shows over 70% of mask wearers have gotten Covid.

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 09:29:48   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
soba1 wrote:
It’s all about conditioning and control


Did Alex tell you that?

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 09:31:42   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
boberic wrote:
Covid 19 is the only viral disease thyat CASES have been counted and given so much improtance. N1H1 virus did not count cases. We don't know the number. If I were to say that thyere were 1 1hhundred million CASES no one could deny this as cases were not counted. Annoying ffacts abbout civid.. 222 thousand deaths, 8 million cases. % of deaths about 4. We do not know this percenrage about many diseases, as cases are not counted. THe question then remains---Is a lockdown necessary when there is a 96% survival rate. What is the survival rate of the seasonal flu?? NOBODY KNOWS. I just noticed that there are many typos. My keyoard has many sticky keys, I need a new keyboard. Will have it in a ffew days.
Covid 19 is the only viral disease thyat CASES hav... (show quote)


What is your disability that precludes proof reading?

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 10:29:17   #
Tex-s
 
Rose42 wrote:
People seem to forget about also the social distancing and basic hygiene like washing hands. All three are needed. There's no point in wearing a mask if you don't wear them properly and most I see don't. So its useless if you're wearing one and have the virus, touch your face then touch a bunch of surfaces thus passing it on to others. The mask nazis forget about the little things. Lol

I wear one when needed but never outside.


You touched on a very real issue about 'proper mask wearing'. There is a really clear cause and affect for this phenomenon. Partisanship. About half the nation steadfastly refuses (with GOOD reason) to believe the mainstream media and about half worship the idol of MSM. The fallout is that about half the folks wearing masks are doing so because they were MANDATED to do so, and not at all because they believe there is a point to doing so. Thus, their "technique" is suspect. This microcosm event within a clearly MACRO issue illustrates a point I've tried to teach for 30 years now.

Persuasion is ALWAYS a better policy than compulsion. Those who convert are always more devoted to the new view, the new policy, or the new faith than those FORCED into compliance. It is true for toddlers and sharing. It's true about drug use, drinking, speeding, sexual activity, overtime, insurance, and masks. Voluntary choices in these realms are make because of convictions and will be made consistently and with care, possibly creating new converts, but mandated compliance will be spotty at best.

The best example I can cite is a girls' sports group at a school in which I was a boys coach at the time. The girls in the group were, one by one, becoming "indiscriminate" in their sexual choices (some as young as 14). A former player, who had had her first child literally 7 months after graduation, and before her 19th birthday, set up a team 'party' at her house. The party became an intervention, with the team being involved with bathing, diapering, laundry, etc, and for good measure, 'mom' called every girl at 1 and 4 and 7 when the baby was up and feeding. That one meeting converted a dozen young ladies into a new line of thinking, and to my knowledge, not one of them had a child before marriage. Their daddies could not have sat on the couch with a shotgun and gotten better results.

This issue alone, mandates, not masks per se, would be enough to keep me out of the DEM tent, but alas, this affinity for mandates is a distant 10th or so on my list of reasons to vote against the left, even if that means voting "for" President Trump.

Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2020 13:33:00   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
DaveO wrote:
The point was the masks were not advertised to protect the wearer.


The point I made is that some were not understanding the article. I feel it says a lot about the safety provided by the mask, if those infected had not been wearing masks the toll would be higher.

In Asia almost anyone in Asia that has a respiratory disease will wear a mask to stop the spread. I have traveled extensively and lived in Asia for some years, they take precautions to slow or stop the spread. I was in Taiwan last winter and as early as January 1st basically the entire nation was masked, school was shut down for only 3 weeks, business operated as usual with no lockdowns, air travel to and from China was stopped, anyone entering the country was confined to either their home or in the case of visitors to a hole room for 14 days. Check on Taiwan's CV19 numbers and see what an early start can do, they did have better info on the disease than did the WHO because of the close ties with mainland China.

Reply
Oct 17, 2020 13:34:30   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
thom w wrote:
I'd like to see the study that shows over 70% of mask wearers have gotten Covid.


Have you been following the conversation or did you just jump in. Some misunderstood what the study says.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.