The Constitution vs trump (Page 2): Liar.

EyeSawYou

JohnFrim wrote:

And that might work really well if the AG were not in Trump's pocket... or elsewhere in his...

Liar.

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

EyeSawYou wrote:

Liar.

"LOL" & "liar" are the best you got? That's just weak, man... just weak.

EyeSawYou

JohnFrim wrote:

"LOL" & "liar" are the best you got? That's just weak, man... just weak.

Nope, just pure truth.

EllieLady Loc: So. CA, USA

JohnFrim wrote:

"LOL" & "liar" are the best you got? That's just weak, man... just weak.

He adheres to the trump method of denegrate, distract & deflect. Limited analytical ability.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Fotoartist wrote:

The Dems have discovered the Constitution. Beautiful! Now they need to study it if they don't want their asses kicked like was done for the impeachment. You just can't flail and wail about because you think something is or is not Constitutional. You actually have to understand the document if you are going to beat Conservatives in this arena. Start schooling up. Most Conservatives have done their homework

To the left, things like the COTUS is merely a stage prop.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

JohnFrim wrote:

And that might work really well if the AG were not in Trump's pocket... or elsewhere in his...

How convenient of you to forget about Obama and Eric Holder and their lockstep......

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

Screamin Scott wrote:

How convenient of you to forget about Obama and Eric Holder and their lockstep......

Forget the "But what about..." nonsense. Two wrongs don't make a right. This is/should be about Trump and Barr, not Cheech and Chong.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

pendennis wrote:

It's always convenient for the Left to quote the C... (show quote)

It's actually quite remarkable what presidents have gotten away wit hereare a few- Out of wedlock children. Segregating federal employees and the armed forc es, Suspended haebus corpus (sp?) Rabid antisemitism. Forced sterilizaton of undesirebles and morons. Womanizers. And too many things to mention. Truth is that many Presidents have actually comittd crimes while in office an no impeachment actions were taken

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

JohnFrim wrote:

Forget the "But what about..." nonsense. Two wrongs don't make a right. This is/should be about Trump and Barr, not Cheech and Chong.

Had the left ever had any issue with the crimes of Obama/Holder they would have some credibility, instead all they bring to the table is hypocrisy.

Must people get it, those that don’t refuse to get it.

This is where you start making more excuses.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

JohnFrim wrote:

Forget the "But what about..." nonsense. Two wrongs don't make a right. This is/should be about Trump and Barr, not Cheech and Chong.

I guess you disregard precedent then? Good for the goose but not the gander?.... Funny, I didn't see you on here denigrating Obama & Holder when they were in lockstep...Your TDS is showing...

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

Screamin Scott wrote:

I guess you disregard precedent then? Good for the goose but not the gander?.... Funny, I didn't see you on here denigrating Obama & Holder when they were in lockstep...Your TDS is showing...

I have explained that politics was of no interest to me until The Orange Buffoon came to prominence.

Precedent DOES MATTER... the whole idea is to NOT REPEAT stupid mistakes. You can't put down Obama & Holder as bad behaviour and then say it's OK for Trump and Barr to repeat that behaviour.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

JohnFrim wrote:

I have explained that politics was of no interest to me until The Orange Buffoon came to prominence.

Precedent DOES MATTER... the whole idea is to NOT REPEAT stupid mistakes. You can't put down Obama & Holder as bad behaviour and then say it's OK for Trump and Barr to repeat that behaviour.

Good thing they haven’t, eh.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

"You can't put down Obama & Holder as bad behaviour and then say it's OK for Trump and Barr to repeat that behaviour."
I never said it was "bad behavior", you did...All I did was point out it was done before...

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

JohnFrim wrote:

I have explained that politics was of no interest to me until The Orange Buffoon came to prominence.

Precedent DOES MATTER... the whole idea is to NOT REPEAT stupid mistakes. You can't put down Obama & Holder as bad behaviour and then say it's OK for Trump and Barr to repeat that behaviour.

The thing of it is, it's not about bad behavior. It's about cammitting a serious crime. And whether or not that crime reaches the level of impeachment. Today's definition of misdeamenor, is a non serious crime, but when the constitution misdemeanor was a serious crime worthy of removing a presdent from office.. Maybe that phone call was wrong, and not perfect, but still not a crime of any kind. Maybe the president is a fool and a horrible person. That's a reason to vote for someone else, not impeachment, So get off your ass and vote for someone else. But look at the dem. candidates. An admitted communist, another socisalist, a complete novice, a doddering sick old man, a multi-billionare who is trying to buy his nomination, and a lone semi-reasonable also-ran

EyeSawYou

JohnFrim wrote:

I have explained that politics was of no interest to me until The Orange Buffoon came to prominence.

Precedent DOES MATTER... the whole idea is to NOT REPEAT stupid mistakes. You can't put down Obama & Holder as bad behaviour and then say it's OK for Trump and Barr to repeat that behaviour.

Listen Mr illiterate, maybe we are saying neither Trump nor Obama was doing any wrong in this particular situation, ever think about that? This "what abousism" is to point out your sides blatant hypocrisy which you nuts seems to despise being expose, it's not about justifying what Trump does.