ratchley wrote:
The old saying "Take it don't Make it" just doesn't apply in our digital world but it is still worth trying to achieve.
Did it ever apply? Those of us who did our own darkroom work "made" every photo.
Soul Dr.
Loc: Beautiful Shenandoah Valley
dpshaffer wrote:
Morons like you keep people from wanting to post on here. If you don't want to add anything positive shut the hell up!
My, my, did someone piss in your cornflakes this morning?
There is no need for such rude rhetoric!
And I'll have you know my IQ is well above average.
Will
That is a very true statement. Although in the dark room we were limited to 'adjustmentsā€¯ we could make. From developer to stop to fix and dogeing (Sp?) and burning are nothing compared to abilities that are available in today's digital environment.
dpshaffer wrote:
Morons like you keep people from wanting to post on here. If you don't want to add anything positive shut the hell up!
He was speaking his mind, unless that's not permitted any more.
Aside from the fact that his statement was true.
If you don't like a comment, walk past it, don't squish people from speaking their mind.
(Maybe I shouldn't have said that so some people don't feel badly.
)
ratchley wrote:
That is a very true statement. Although in the dark room we were limited to 'adjustmentsā€¯ we could make. From developer to stop to fix and dogeing (Sp?) and burning are nothing compared to abilities that are available in today's digital environment.
A lot more could be done in the darkroom than most people imagine. Check out
https://www.uelsmann.net All done in the darkroom, although granted it was a lot more difficult than Photoshop.
tomad
Loc: North Carolina
Coming from a background of years of shooting Kodachrome, I try very hard to get it right SOOC as I don't like editing RAW files. That said I always edit every Jpeg as they can always be improved with slight light touch editing of things like exposure, clarity, saturation, or contrast.
My post processing is rudimentary at best, but I get pretty satisfying results with a zoom lens, a camera (Sony A77) that is smarter than I am, taking care to set up the shot and then taking lots of shots at it. That's the nice thing about digital - they're just electrons and you can throw away the rejects and not shed a tear.
Learning editing skills is next on my list, but I'm having lots of fun at this level!
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
Longshadow wrote:
(Umpteen is not a definitive number, it's a number without a limit
)
That sounds about right. Even though it maybe the "umpteen" time, it is still a "fair game" subject for opinion and comment. I will still try to contribute when I have the time. Otherwise, I will pass by some.
I do like this subject. For me, it is always about getting it SOOC so it will not require touch up. Without any real PP software, free or otherwise, it becomes important to me to get it right the first time. That sometimes pushes my camera to its limits.
Stash
Loc: South Central Massachusetts
Soul Dr. wrote:
Are we going to go down this road again, for the umpteenth time again????
Sure, why not. There may be some newbies on here that haven't seen or read everything. I manage to get something out of most things I read and see here and that's what it's all about in my humble opinion.
Stash wrote:
Sure, why not. There may be some newbies on here that haven't seen or read everything. I manage to get something out of most things I read and see here and that's what it's all about in my humble opinion.
:absolutely!! Right-on, BRO!!! ....RJM
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.