Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
When did the Canon SX-70 Come Out?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Aug 30, 2019 16:46:39   #
dwmoar Loc: Oregon, Willamette Valley
 
74images wrote:
Well if I have to Use a Backup Powerful Flash, I bought a ONN Flash (Wal-Mart Brand), that I got for my Current SX-50, & I Use it for a SLAVE FLASH! That has a Flat Screw On Stand, so that the Flash can Operate Alone, or Hooked on a Tripod, Cause if I Hook it on the Hot Shoe of my SX-50, & Shoot an Indoor Photo, the Image comes Out Blurry, cause the Flash Sync Shutter Speed on the ONN Flash Comes Out at 1/20th, or Lower, the Standard Flash Sync Speed is Set at 1/60th, or 125/the, or Higher if you have a Good Hi-End Flash with Hi-End D.S.L.R.

& This was to Replace My Other Flash... a Sunpack DigiFlash 3000, which I Bought with the SX-50 in February 2014, in which that Flash Acts Up on my SX-50, the Flash Photos are Dark at Times, & Giving out Good Flash Sync Speed at 1/60th, or 125th, but for some Reason, 4 Months After when I got the Sunpack DigiFlash 3000, it Started Acting Up, & it Took Good Zoom Flash Photos at 92 Feet, by me Adjusting the Flash Head.

I Took it to Samy's Camera here in Culver City, Calif when I Bought it & the SX-50 at the Same Time in February 2014, & they Sent it Out to be Looked At, & Sent Me A Replacement Flash, but for Some Reason Like the 1st DigiFlash 3000 it Half Ass Fires & Those Flash Photos come Out Dark, Even if it's a Far Flash Zoom within the 92 Feet Range, Half Good... Half Dark!

I can't Figure Out why the DigiFlash 3000 is Acting Up on my SX-50?

The Auto Focus Light on the Flash (Sunpack) when you Take Photos in the Dark does Not Work, the Same with my ONN Flash with my SX-50.

My ONN Flash I Paid around $32.00 at Wal-Mart, & it May Not Work Well Attached on my Hot Shoe of my SX-50 cause of the Slow Flash Sync, It Serves as a BackUp Slave Light if I Use My Built In Flash on my SX-50, & I don't know why my Sunpack DigiFlash 3000 is Tripping? It Hasn't been Dropped or Abused!

If I Bought the SX-70, I'd be Pissed if Canon Decided to Leave Out the Hot Shoe on the SX-70, the Reason I bought the SX-50 in the 1st Place, was because of the Features, Including the Hot Shoe so I could Hook Up a More Powerful Flash, & Avoid Using the Built in Flash so it Wouldn't Cause Battery Drain when Using the SX-50.

& By Not Offering a Hot Shoe, on the SX-70, it Puts Major Flash Drain on the Built In Flash, Even if I Used a Slave Light with the Built In Flash.

Why Canon... Why?

74images
Well if I have to Use a Backup Powerful Flash, I b... (show quote)


First and best guess, would be to save money in making it. Or to force one to buy a more expensive model that has a hot shoe. Take your pick, no matter which one you choose it still comes down to making money.

Reply
Aug 30, 2019 20:12:10   #
cutefix
 
Canon G3X is better than either sx60 or sx70hs as it has a1 inch sensor aside from being weather sealed and had ND filter..

Reply
Aug 30, 2019 21:33:59   #
Haydon
 
cutefix wrote:
Canon G3X is better than either sx60 or sx70hs as it has a1 inch sensor aside from being weather sealed and had ND filter..


It serves a different purpose despite having better image quality. The G3X doesn't have a 50/65x zoom which can help pull in a distant target or fill the frame with a small object several feet away.

Reply
 
 
Aug 30, 2019 22:39:52   #
hj Loc: Florida
 
Gene51 wrote:
You find it easier to ask a question like this on a photography forum when with fewer words "release date Canon SX70" typed into a Google search yields everything you are asking about, and more?


I am increasingly irritated with google searches. I type in a few descriptive words and all I get back are pages of LINKS. I type on a link and get more links. Phooey!

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 02:21:19   #
cutefix
 
Then if you like higher zoom then either the Nikon P900 or P1000 with 83x and 125x Does a better job than the canon sx60 and sx70.

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 03:59:32   #
Haydon
 
cutefix wrote:
Then if you like higher zoom then either the Nikon P900 or P1000 with 83x and 125x Does a better job than the canon sx60 and sx70.


FWIW- I've tried the SX60 and returned it because of inferior image quality. As to the Nikon's, it won't support my Canon flashes to the same functionaliy. Maybe you can post an image from your own collection illustrating superior IQ for $150.00 that I paid for mine.

You should read this article from Stokes a well known bird photographer and why she continues to supported the SX50. It will fill in your missing blanks.

http://stokesbirdingblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/canon-sx-50-hs-for-bird-photography-i.html

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 04:22:41   #
74images Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
Low Budget Dave wrote:
The Canon SX-70 is not weather-sealed.

As I stated, you live NEAR Burbank, so you don't have the same weather I do. I live near Orlando, and we have had 80 days of rain in the last 100, (and are about to get five more). Because of the rain, most people would not bring the SX-70 (or any non-sealed camera) outside to take photos. On the average day, you would end up with a $400 piece of junk, (which may be very well what you were looking at in the camera store.)

I was just trying to provide some context. There are plenty of great bridge cameras out there that are not sitting around dead in camera stores within a year of manufacture.
The Canon SX-70 is not weather-sealed. br br As... (show quote)


Florida is Hot & Humid, got Gators, Bugs Big as Buicks, & Other Critters, & Sinkholes.

I have a Friend who Lives on the Ocean in Ormond Beach, Nearly 60 Miles from Orlando, & has Been Living there Since 96, & She Loves it there than she Does in Orlando, or Inland in Florida, & She Had Toured her Adoptive State, She was Originally from L.A. & Moved around the Country before she Settled in Ormond Beach, in Some Places of Florida is Hot & Humid, she told the Story of her Cousin was Visiting her in Florida & he had a Olympus Film Camera, & they were in a Town 60 Miles from Orlando, it was Hot & Humid, & his Camera somehow Starred Growing Fungus Or Mold & he Caught it in Time! But Wondered how it got on his Camera?

Still doesen't know How Today?

74images

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Aug 31, 2019 04:26:06   #
74images Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
Haydon wrote:
FWIW- I've tried the SX60 and returned it because of inferior image quality. As to the Nikon's, it won't support my Canon flashes to the same functionaliy. Maybe you can post an image from your own collection illustrating superior IQ for $150.00 that I paid for mine.

You should read this article from Stokes a well known bird photographer and why she supported the SX50. It will fill in your missing blanks.

http://stokesbirdingblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/canon-sx-50-hs-for-bird-photography-i.html
FWIW- I've tried the SX60 and returned it because ... (show quote)


Sunpack has a Universal Flash that you can Use for both Canon & Nikon Cameras, Best Buy Sells it for Just Under $60.00.

It's Also an Off Flash & Slave Light also!

74images

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 04:30:23   #
Haydon
 
74images wrote:
Sunpack has a Universal Flash that you can Use for both Canon & Nikon Cameras, Best Buy Sells it for Just Under $60.00.

It's Also an Off Flash & Slave Light also!

74images


That maybe so but does the Sunpak support ETTL? The EX-RT that will communicate the advanced features built in to other Canon products. In future I have no need for any further Canon flashes. They are overly expensive and I have 2 of the 600's. I'm using studio light and Godox products for outdoor work primarily but nonetheless, typically name brand products matched with name brand accessories retain full functionality of features available and communicate well when paired. I do support third party products but you get what you pay for and you pay more than you get when you buy name brand :)

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 18:42:53   #
74images Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
dwmoar wrote:
Perhaps doing a web search first would of saved you some time and answered all that questions you asked like when it came out October 22, 2018


Did you Look at One of my Post?

I said I was Out of Touch with UHH for Around 6 Months, & haven't Looked at the Daily UHH Blogs During that Period & didn't know that the SX-70 was Out Until I Saw it This Monday at a Best Buy in Burbank, Calif.

Read the Fine Print Through before you Post a Response to me!

74images

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 19:05:57   #
74images Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
Haydon wrote:
That maybe so but does the Sunpak support ETTL? The EX-RT that will communicate the advanced features built in to other Canon products. In future I have no need for any further Canon flashes. They are overly expensive and I have 2 of the 600's. I'm using studio light and Godox products for outdoor work primarily but nonetheless, typically name brand products matched with name brand accessories retain full functionality of features available and communicate well when paired. I do support third party products but you get what you pay for and you pay more than you get when you buy name brand :)
That maybe so but does the Sunpak support ETTL? Th... (show quote)


I Bought the Sunpack Digiflash 3000 cause it was Recommended to go with the SX-50 which I Bought in February 2014 at Samy's Camera in Culver City, Calif.

It Worked, but By That June, the Flash, would Fire in a Low Power Mode Half of the Time, Even if I Used Bounce or Swivel Mode.

It wasn't the Batteries, or Damage, where it was Dropped or Abused, it wouldn't Fire Full Flash at Times Even if i Adjusted the Zoom Mode.

I Sent it to Samy's & was Given Another One, & it Still Half Ass Fires Full Flash at Any Mode.

When I Bought the ONN Flash from Wal-Mart it had Bounce & Swivel, & Has A Slave Light with a Flat Stand you can Place on Whatever or Hook Up on a Tripod, but the Flash Sync will Fire at 1/20th or 1/30th, so I Just Use it as A Slave Light with my Built in Flash!

The Canon Flashes were Too High in Cost $$$ for me, & I Had a Budget of $700.00, I wanted Camera & a Detachable Flash with the Budget I Had at the Time, so I Bought a Sunpack, I had Sunpack in the 80's & 90's & that were Good in Quality.

74images

Reply
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Aug 31, 2019 19:09:43   #
74images Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
Haydon wrote:
FWIW- I've tried the SX60 and returned it because of inferior image quality. As to the Nikon's, it won't support my Canon flashes to the same functionaliy. Maybe you can post an image from your own collection illustrating superior IQ for $150.00 that I paid for mine.

You should read this article from Stokes a well known bird photographer and why she continues to supported the SX50. It will fill in your missing blanks.

http://stokesbirdingblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/canon-sx-50-hs-for-bird-photography-i.html
FWIW- I've tried the SX60 and returned it because ... (show quote)


Sunpack has a Universal Flash that Sells at Best Buy that Works for both Canon & Nikon, Amazon May Carry it Also.

74images

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 19:14:37   #
hj Loc: Florida
 
74images wrote:
Did you Look at One of my Post?

I said I was Out of Touch with UHH for Around 6 Months, & haven't Looked at the Daily UHH Blogs During that Period & didn't know that the SX-70 was Out Until I Saw it This Monday at a Best Buy in Burbank, Calif.

Read the Fine Print Through before you Post a Response to me!

74images


dwmoar wrote:
"Perhaps doing a web search first would of saved you some time and answered all that questions you asked like when it came out October 22, 2018" . demoar's response in no way discounted your being away from UHH forum for six months. You asked when that camera came out. He and at least two others said, you could have answered your own question with a quick web search for the Canon SX70 camera. Those suggestions have nothing to do with your not being on UHH for six months.

Reply
Aug 31, 2019 22:16:35   #
74images Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
hj wrote:
dwmoar wrote:
"Perhaps doing a web search first would of saved you some time and answered all that questions you asked like when it came out October 22, 2018" . demoar's response in no way discounted your being away from UHH forum for six months. You asked when that camera came out. He and at least two others said, you could have answered your own question with a quick web search for the Canon SX70 camera. Those suggestions have nothing to do with your not being on UHH for six months.
dwmoar wrote: br "Perhaps doing a web search ... (show quote)


I didn't know that the Camera (SX-70) was Out Till Monday when I saw it on Display at a Best Buy here in Burbank, Calif, & that's why I Checked with Site Users on UHH on when the Camera Came Out?

I Received Advice & Links to the Camera & Checked these Links Out.

You're Right... I could have Googled About the SX-70, or went to Canon Website, I Wanted to get Answers from UHH Members & they Advised me where to Go, & I'll Remember Next Time + Very Little Is Said about the Bridge Cameras due to The Flooding of Phone Cameras & what they can Do, & I heard Nothing about the SX-70 Until I saw it This Past Monday

I did get to Try it Out for the 1st Time at Another Best Buy Store in West Hollywood, Because the Battery at the Burbank Store was Dead & Despite it's Lack of a Hot Shoe for a Detachable Flash for the SX-70, it's a Fairly Good Camera.

74images

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.