hipines wrote:
I've been using crop-sensor DSLRs (Nikon D-40x and D-7000) since switching from film cameras a number of years ago. I'm now looking to get a full-frame camera. I'm not a big tech guy, so I don't need all the latest bells & whistles or super-high MP sensors such as on the Canon 5D S and Nikon D850. I also don't shoot video. I mainly shoot landscape and nature subjects. I'd like something that's fairly user-friendly but is still capable of producing excellent results (assuming the user is competent!). Since I'll need new full-frame lenses I don't need to stick with Nikon. Some of the cameras I've looked at are Canon 5D Mk III and IV and Nikon D810. I'm also considering the Canon 6D Mk II or Nikon D750 to save weight and money. I've read tons of reviews, but now I'd like to hear from real people who have been using their cameras and lenses for awhile.
What camera and lenses do you prefer for general/landscape/nature photography?
Can you get as good quality images from the smaller cameras (6D MKII & D750) as the larger ones?
I'd like to be able to produce sharp prints up to 20 x 30.
Sorry for such a long post - thanks in advance for any ideas or suggestions you can provide.
I've been using crop-sensor DSLRs (Nikon D-40x and... (
show quote)
The first questions asked here should be why are you looking to upgrade, and why do you want to go full frame? What is your current gear not doing that makes you want to change?
hipines wrote:
I've been using crop-sensor DSLRs (Nikon D-40x and D-7000) since switching from film cameras a number of years ago. I'm now looking to get a full-frame camera. I'm not a big tech guy, so I don't need all the latest bells & whistles or super-high MP sensors such as on the Canon 5D S and Nikon D850. I also don't shoot video. I mainly shoot landscape and nature subjects. I'd like something that's fairly user-friendly but is still capable of producing excellent results (assuming the user is competent!). Since I'll need new full-frame lenses I don't need to stick with Nikon. Some of the cameras I've looked at are Canon 5D Mk III and IV and Nikon D810. I'm also considering the Canon 6D Mk II or Nikon D750 to save weight and money. I've read tons of reviews, but now I'd like to hear from real people who have been using their cameras and lenses for awhile.
What camera and lenses do you prefer for general/landscape/nature photography?
Can you get as good quality images from the smaller cameras (6D MKII & D750) as the larger ones?
I'd like to be able to produce sharp prints up to 20 x 30.
Sorry for such a long post - thanks in advance for any ideas or suggestions you can provide.
I've been using crop-sensor DSLRs (Nikon D-40x and... (
show quote)
I like my D750 and 28-300mm lens.
I am going to assume that you have a good assortment of lenses for use with "cropped cameras." I am sure you know that you are heading toward a big investment buying a "full frame" camera and lenses to fit it.
I own a D7000 and it keeps on giving me the files I want. It is great for landscapes, action and wildlife photography. Excellent to make portraits too. Low light performance is very good, at least it has served me well for that.
I have a D610 and the D7000 and I find that I use more the D7000.
hipines wrote:
... Can you get as good quality images from the smaller cameras (6D MKII & D750) as the larger ones? ...
Either one would be a good body, and you'd likely be happy with either.
But here's another idea to consider. Right now you can find used D800's with little use and in almost new condition for less than $1000.
The contrast detection autofocus on mirrorless cameras, even the dual pixel contrast detection type, still can't match the speed and reliability of phase detection autofocus used in DSLR cameras. Sports photography is dominated by Canon and Nikon DSLR cameras.
CO wrote:
The contrast detection autofocus on mirrorless cameras, even the dual pixel contrast detection type, still can't match the speed and reliability of phase detection autofocus used in DSLR cameras. Sports photography is dominated by Canon and Nikon DSLR cameras.
The Fuji X-T2 mirrorless camera has 91 phase detection points. Its autofocus performance for sports is excellent.
http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_t2/features/page_02.html
This is just a sales pitch.
hipines wrote:
I've been using crop-sensor DSLRs (Nikon D-40x and D-7000) since switching from film cameras a number of years ago. I'm now looking to get a full-frame camera. I'm not a big tech guy, so I don't need all the latest bells & whistles or super-high MP sensors such as on the Canon 5D S and Nikon D850. I also don't shoot video. I mainly shoot landscape and nature subjects. I'd like something that's fairly user-friendly but is still capable of producing excellent results (assuming the user is competent!). Since I'll need new full-frame lenses I don't need to stick with Nikon. Some of the cameras I've looked at are Canon 5D Mk III and IV and Nikon D810. I'm also considering the Canon 6D Mk II or Nikon D750 to save weight and money. I've read tons of reviews, but now I'd like to hear from real people who have been using their cameras and lenses for awhile.
What camera and lenses do you prefer for general/landscape/nature photography?
Can you get as good quality images from the smaller cameras (6D MKII & D750) as the larger ones?
I'd like to be able to produce sharp prints up to 20 x 30.
Sorry for such a long post - thanks in advance for any ideas or suggestions you can provide.
I've been using crop-sensor DSLRs (Nikon D-40x and... (
show quote)
I've been a Canon user for 40 years now and I upgraded to the Canon 6DM2 about 6 months ago and I am generally happy with the camera and lenses. Pretty sure you won't have a problem with 20x30 prints with the 26 MB sensor size. The touch screen, autofocus, and articulating screen work fine. Dynamic range is a bit of problem but nothing that can be solved in post processing. Having said all of that I have noticed some youtube landscape photographers that I follow are switching to the high end Sony (A7R3?- the one that costs around $3K). There is a general evolution going on towards full frame mirrorless cameras. Pretty sure both Nikon and Canon are working on their own versions because Sony is taking a bunch of market share.
jccash wrote:
Very goo post. Thank you
You are welcome. The truth always wins out.
ToBoldlyGo wrote:
This is just a sales pitch.
Just supplying facts, no sales pitch. The OP should buy what suits their needs and budget. Cheers
wds0410 wrote:
I've been a Canon user for 40 years now and I upgraded to the Canon 6DM2 about 6 months ago and I am generally happy with the camera and lenses. Pretty sure you won't have a problem with 20x30 prints with the 26 MB sensor size. The touch screen, autofocus, and articulating screen work fine. Dynamic range is a bit of problem but nothing that can be solved in post processing. Having said all of that I have noticed some youtube landscape photographers that I follow are switching to the high end Sony (A7R3?- the one that costs around $3K). There is a general evolution going on towards full frame mirrorless cameras. Pretty sure both Nikon and Canon are working on their own versions because Sony is taking a bunch of market share.
I've been a Canon user for 40 years now and I upgr... (
show quote)
You are correct,Nikon and Canon are spending millions developing their own fullframe pro-grade mirrorless cameras to answer Sony. Both makers will probably announce them this fall at Photokina, with models available sometime in 2019. Expect 36 megapixel mirrorless cameras from both Nikon and Canon, as they already have sensors that size in their lineups. I hope all makers succeed here, that will keep everyone innovating, including Sony. BTW Sony will probably announce another new camera, the A7SIII at Photokina also this fall.
Hey I was a loyal Nikon and Canon user for decades and made a host of award-winning shots with that gear. I just went to Sony for all the great features that mirrorless has over DSLRs, and for Sonys great image quality and low-light performance in stills and video. None of this means you cant still make great shots with DSLRs, of course you can and will. The Sonys just make my creative process easier and quicker, and with more options to give me an advantage over the pro competition. Buy what you love,need and what works for you and be happy. Cheers
FYI I own fullframe mirrorless A7RIII ,and A7III; along with APS-C mirrorless A6500. I use a mix of Sony and Sigma lenses. Cheers
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.