An open message to David Phares re Canon shutter count
May 21, 2018 18:45:07 #
With reference to http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-531055-1.html
Point one, I can't respond to you in your own thread if you block me from doing so as you have done. You are clearly not interested in the facts, yet you wish to deny the right of reply.
Point two, the software I recommended does actually work for your cameras. I may not have a 7D mk II to test it on, but I do have others of the same generation.
Point three, you started by saying that the camera you wished to sell you described as "I know it is less, or near, 200 clicks, but I have been thwarted in trying to find that actual count."
Point four, according to you, "I took the camera to my local Canon Dealer, and he got the shutter count (15,500) for me, which was higher than I thought it was. This camera is now listed for sale here on UHH."
Point five, Less than 200 and 15,500 are somewhat different, yet you wouldn't spend around $5 to buy a tool that would give you the answer.
Point six, you don't seem to understand the technology, nor the difference between the image processor and the firmware.
Point seven, it appears that your ego is more important to you than real information, offered freely. You seem to have very little integrity, which is sometimes a requirement for for a member of the judiciary.
Point eight, "immune my character" is not correct English. Impugn would be the correct word, and in your case, Sir, the correct usage and well deserved.
Apologies to others on UHH, but it appears that David Phares is beyond help, and completely unwilling to even consider good advice or to check his information.
Point one, I can't respond to you in your own thread if you block me from doing so as you have done. You are clearly not interested in the facts, yet you wish to deny the right of reply.
Point two, the software I recommended does actually work for your cameras. I may not have a 7D mk II to test it on, but I do have others of the same generation.
Point three, you started by saying that the camera you wished to sell you described as "I know it is less, or near, 200 clicks, but I have been thwarted in trying to find that actual count."
Point four, according to you, "I took the camera to my local Canon Dealer, and he got the shutter count (15,500) for me, which was higher than I thought it was. This camera is now listed for sale here on UHH."
Point five, Less than 200 and 15,500 are somewhat different, yet you wouldn't spend around $5 to buy a tool that would give you the answer.
Point six, you don't seem to understand the technology, nor the difference between the image processor and the firmware.
Point seven, it appears that your ego is more important to you than real information, offered freely. You seem to have very little integrity, which is sometimes a requirement for for a member of the judiciary.
Point eight, "immune my character" is not correct English. Impugn would be the correct word, and in your case, Sir, the correct usage and well deserved.
Apologies to others on UHH, but it appears that David Phares is beyond help, and completely unwilling to even consider good advice or to check his information.
May 21, 2018 18:58:19 #
May 21, 2018 19:51:25 #
DaveO wrote:
Forget the Christmas Card this year... 
Agreed, I'd be willing to pay for the postage, but I don't think I could find a suitable card!
May 21, 2018 20:01:48 #
That old song keeps running through my head -----
Let It Be -- Let It Be --
Oh, Let It Be ----
Let It Be -- Let It Be --
Oh, Let It Be ----
May 21, 2018 20:12:05 #
Peterff wrote:
With reference to http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-53... (show quote)
So why respond to someone who doesn't want to hear from you? A need to get in the last word???
--
May 21, 2018 20:29:19 #
Bill_de wrote:
If I reply to you here and then put you on ignore, did I get in the last word? So why respond to someone who doesn't want to hear from you? A need to get in the last word???
--
--
May 21, 2018 20:31:32 #
Peterff wrote:
With reference to http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-53... (show quote)
Ego: the part of the mind that mediates between the conscious and the unconscious and is responsible for reality testing and a sense of personal identity.
May 21, 2018 20:35:12 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
If I reply to you here and then put you on ignore, did I get in the last word?
You always get in the last word.
--
May 21, 2018 20:36:20 #
May 21, 2018 20:42:40 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
If I reply to you here and then put you on ignore, did I get in the last word?
No Linda! It has to be in a thread that you started. You can't put anyone on ignore in threads started by others.
May 21, 2018 20:43:55 #
BebuLamar wrote:
Yeah, I know. Definitely a bummer No Linda! It has to be in a thread that you started. You can't put anyone on ignore in threads started by others.
(though don't mis-understand, I do love Bill_de!)May 21, 2018 20:59:27 #
May 21, 2018 21:00:39 #
DaveO wrote:
Wasn't it Jack Nicholson who had that delicious line, "You can't handle the truth!" Good thing we have fun here!!
May 21, 2018 21:02:30 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Wasn't it Jack Nicholson who had that delicious line, "You can't handle the truth!"
May 21, 2018 21:16:21 #
DaveO wrote:
We could always wander over to that 20-page thread that consists solely of people saying AYE or NAY. Now that looks like fun times!Good thing we have fun here!!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.