Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What lens would you have used for this Macro Shot
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Apr 24, 2018 16:22:07   #
Diocletian
 
Dr.Nikon wrote:
Lamiaceae .., I first placed the SD Pro card into the MacBook Pro to take a look ... I don’t have a reader for the New XQD card which I wanted to insert in the MacBook..but no way to do that ..so luckily I had the SD card as a duplicate in the camera .,, anyway .., I did no processing on th MacBook ..I just looked at the data .., I’ll fully process after the XQD reader arrives .., so I processed everything on my IPADPRO which said sorry.., we can’t process this over 20 mega pix ... so I did a simple processing ..

The actual that will go on canvas (I have a client $ already )

..
Lamiaceae .., I first placed the SD Pro card into ... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 25, 2018 06:28:53   #
Chwlo
 
Sadly I probably would have missed the shot, seeing something so beautiful I would have froze. Those look great to me. Thank you for sharing.

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 07:03:45   #
ELNikkor
 
Awesome shot! A great promotion photo for lens, camera, and photographer. Thanks for including photo data, and the info. that this photo has had minimal post, is from a jpeg, and only 3mp as we see it. I believe so many picture takers rack their cameras up to max for every photo, convinced that "the higher the mp, the higher the quality of the final image". When sent to the web, I always resize down to between 100 and 300 kb, (yes, that's KILOBYTES), and the photos look just fine on the screen..

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2018 07:38:41   #
ramseynet
 
Stick it up the butt? What?

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 07:52:28   #
jbk224 Loc: Long Island, NY
 
Great shot! You should think about offering this picture to TMZ. I guess even this Geico star takes a vacation. Who would have thought!!!

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 07:57:02   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Dr.Nikon wrote:
On location in Hawaii .., Macro shot ,, ok , get out the primes .. 85mm... no wait .. 105mm .. 1.4...1.8... oh wait ..,lets just pull,out the 200-500 5.6 Nikon .. stick it up the buttt of a new D850 ... and give me something I can write home about ...OK .., I did ..and not by using the œsweet spot of the lens .. , blasted full,out at 500mm ..distance 10ft ..


In my honest opinion, if you had a Nikon 105 Macro lens, what other shots would you miss cause you did not have the 200-500 attached? My advice is to keep on shooting as you have, there is nothing wrong with your shot. It is very good.
However, if you like to do Macro, I too shoot with a Nikon D500 with the 200-500 lens attached. I do sometimes carry a Sony A77II with a Minolta AF 100 mm micro I got this lens off ebay for about $80.00. I attach this camera and lens unto a spider belt around my waist, (like an old western gun slinger. If I see a micro shot, I very carefully set my Nikon down, unholster my Sony and take the shot.

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 08:08:07   #
Rineal Loc: Copake NY
 
Great shot, unusual composition, wonderful colors!
Richard

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2018 08:40:54   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
lamiaceae wrote:
Interesting, such nearly "prime" colors. How did you process to the JPG you actually posted? On full zoom-in it pixelates with remnants! It started at a whopping 52.9MB from a D850! Oh, I see it is a 2.98MB JPG. I don't usually go so small, leave them at 5 - 8 MB from 18 to 25MB RAW original's from my several 14 to 24MP APS-C cameras. I don't get that sort of processing / JPG noise. Why did you?


Yawn

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 09:42:56   #
DanielB Loc: San Diego, Ca
 
Is this truly a Macro or just a close up shot with a zoom lens - I say the latter. Never the less a very nice shot. Love the colors.
Dr.Nikon wrote:
On location in Hawaii .., Macro shot ,, ok , get out the primes .. 85mm... no wait .. 105mm .. 1.4...1.8... oh wait ..,lets just pull,out the 200-500 5.6 Nikon .. stick it up the buttt of a new D850 ... and give me something I can write home about ...OK .., I did ..and not by using the œsweet spot of the lens .. , blasted full,out at 500mm ..distance 10ft ..

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 09:45:29   #
spraguead Loc: Boston, MA
 
the 105 would be a good choice, except that moving towards the subject would may caused him to call it quits for the day. You got an awesome shot, be happy!

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 10:18:55   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Dr.Nikon wrote:
On location in Hawaii .., Macro shot ,, ok , get out the primes .. 85mm... no wait .. 105mm .. 1.4...1.8... oh wait ..,lets just pull,out the 200-500 5.6 Nikon .. stick it up the buttt of a new D850 ... and give me something I can write home about ...OK .., I did ..and not by using the œsweet spot of the lens .. , blasted full,out at 500mm ..distance 10ft ..


Nice! You had the right lens for the moment. Those critters are skittish, and move pretty quickly if they feel threatened. Blink, and they're out of frame. So ten feet worked great for that.

I have a 1980 Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AI-S and a Nikkor 55mm f/3.5 from the 1960s. Neither of them would be appropriate for this scene. I'd want something similar to what you used.

I use Micro 4/3 gear now. My go-to macro lens is a 30mm f/2.8 (60mm FF equivalent). It gets down to about an 18mm wide field of view, great for general copy work and re-photographing slides and negatives, but pretty useless for lizards, insects, and other small animals. Actually, it has the practicality of the 55mm Nikkors, but it focuses a lot closer without a bellows or extension ring. 1:1 on Micro 4/3 is about like 4:1 on full frame...

Reply
 
 
Apr 25, 2018 10:22:22   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
That's a great shot with the zoom lens you used. Colors are deep and rich. We may not have known it was not a macro lens, had you not told us. One photographer I know uses a Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, with a 1:1 magnification. As sharp as the closeup is from your quality zoom lens. In reality, it is not a 1:1 magnification true macro lens. But kudos to your photo. I could not have done better.

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 10:40:49   #
throughrhettseyes Loc: Rowlett, TX
 
I have a D-500 and use my 200-500mm f5.9 all the time for macro. Other than having to stay back over 4' it is great. At the 1.5 crop factor that would be a 750mm max. You can use tube extenders to get closer too. That lens is so sharp and clear it will surprise you.

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 11:28:21   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
Your photo with its color and composition is outstanding. In this case, a closeup truly hit the mark. If your intent was to produce a high-resolution photo of the Gecko's eye, then a macro lens would be the tool of choice. Nikon makes a 200mm macro lens that is first-class (I wish I had one) and its advantage is its focus distance from the front of the lens to the subject (although the real distance is measured from the sensor inside the camera).

This is important to avoid scaring off critters that you want to photograph. I have a 105mm 1:1 macro and a 60mm 2:1 super macro but I nearly have to touch the subject with the lens to get them in focus. Great for studio not so great when trying to take a picture of a wasp on a plant! I took the camera out yesterday with the 2:1 and I had to get so close that the little bug crawled on to my lens and was walking around.

You are fortunate to live in a tropical paradise that affords you unlimited beauty and exotic creatures so please continue to share your images with us all.

Reply
Apr 25, 2018 12:39:09   #
wapiti Loc: round rock, texas
 
200mm macro

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.