Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
How Much Tech Do We Need To Know To Be Good Photographers???
Page <<first <prev 6 of 14 next> last>>
Mar 17, 2018 11:26:11   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Kiron Kid wrote:
Just enough to bring your vision to fruition. Far too many photographers obsess about cameras, lens sharpness, pixel count, etc. However, their vision and results are mediocre at best.

KK


Kid, that seems to fly in the face of about 90% of the discussions here...., but I agree!!!
SS

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 11:27:53   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I'm on the no side. All one has to know is the basics, f-stop, shutter, ISO and how they work with each other. I use manual mode 95% of the time. The rest of the features that came with the camera are fluff and, to me, a waste of money. Esthetically, one should pay attention to composition, but then that is not a technical issue.
--Bob

SharpShooter wrote:
As I see the parade of post on UHH, most are about TECH, cameras, lenses or how they work or what we need?!
Does anybody have to know or even care how the duel pixel focusing system in their camera even works?
Who cares what the light meter is doing, the camera can do that all by itself!
Most of the pics shot on Manual are worse than the ones shot on Auto, at least that’s what many come on here saying.
I’ve said here many times that composition is KING! So if we compose well, why do we need to know any technical BS at all?!?! Gone are the days of full manual cameras with no meters and flying by the seat of your pants.
The cameras are way smarter than we are anyway.
With only a few exceptions, do we need to know any tech at all??? Do we?
Do you, other than to sound impressive???
I say no, what do you say?!
Feel free to post some pics to show your position. How you feel knowledge of tech helped your image!
SS
As I see the parade of post on UHH, most are about... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 11:31:02   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
Quote. "Most of the pics shot in manual, are worse than the ones shot in auto?" I shot only manual when SLR film cameras were King. I've heard some photographers say they prefer AF over MF. And will only buy AF lenses. But, it's not that difficult to manual focus, and get good pics. There are also hundreds of thousands of vintage lenses still in use today.

Reply
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Mar 17, 2018 11:31:04   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Capn_Dave wrote:
You don't need no stinkin technical stuff............................................ Until something goes wrong


Yes, then you send it to Canikon, so those that DO know can work on it....., or we would fix it ourselves and not complain about how much it COST!!!
SS

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 11:37:45   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
moonhawk wrote:
Maybe you should change your screen name to "Snapshooter".



That's what I REALLY wanted but it was taken!!!
SS

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 11:40:48   #
autofocus Loc: North Central Connecticut
 
SharpShooter wrote:
As I see the parade of post on UHH, most are about TECH, cameras, lenses or how they work or what we need?!
Does anybody have to know or even care how the duel pixel focusing system in their camera even works?
Who cares what the light meter is doing, the camera can do that all by itself!
Most of the pics shot on Manual are worse than the ones shot on Auto, at least that’s what many come on here saying.
I’ve said here many times that composition is KING! So if we compose well, why do we need to know any technical BS at all?!?! Gone are the days of full manual cameras with no meters and flying by the seat of your pants.
The cameras are way smarter than we are anyway.
With only a few exceptions, do we need to know any tech at all??? Do we?
Do you, other than to sound impressive???
I say no, what do you say?!
Feel free to post some pics to show your position. How you feel knowledge of tech helped your image!
SS
As I see the parade of post on UHH, most are about... (show quote)


A pilot needs to know all the technical aspects of flying, controls, instruments, weather patterns and conditions, etc, but that alone does not necessarily make a pilot good. I think in photography, knowing and understanding your gear, the vagaries of exposure, being able to read the light, and of equal importance, and something you did not mention, and that is understanding the elements of design. Granted, some people know very little, but somehow, always manage to produce wonderful images. A gifted eye I would call it. And when I first met my wife she was that way. Shooting film with an AE-1 in full auto/program mode she produced some very remarkable images. Today, with much more technical knowledge under her belt, she produces even better images. She still has that "gifted eye" (which I often think it's something you're born with) but now she has a far better understanding of the technicalities of the camera, the lens, exposure, light, and of the overall composition. I think you need a good smattering of both to really be good at your craft. And there are those that know all about the technical stuff, yet have a hard time producing a memorable image. Maybe it's just a lack of imagination or creativity. I think being able to "see" is probably what's most important, we literally are surrounded by great photo opportunities everyday, everywhere...you just need to see them.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 11:51:08   #
Real Nikon Lover Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
A simple analogy....

An EMT is taught to do certain things for certain conditions. Basic Care. A Paramedic learns all of that plus more, and WHY they do it.

The EMT gets ~100+ hours of instruction, the paramedic 2000 hours of instruction.

Both save lives... but who has a better chance of saving you?

They both have varying levels of technology but need the knowledge to go with it.

I guess the same is true with photographers and their cameras.

Here is my position (fetal LOL):



Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2018 11:53:55   #
Tracy B. Loc: Indiana
 
I like to learn everything about my camera and DOF, hyperfocal distance, etc..... But, I don't know if you NEED to know all of that.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 11:55:53   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Morning Star wrote:
Oh, your poor photos!!! Sending them for an arraignment??? What have they done to deserve that?

Sorry, SS, couldn't resist. I know quite well that you mean arrangement...


Hey, I've been arraigned before, I just didn't realize it was because my photography was so bad!!! LoL
SS

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 12:02:58   #
dkguill Loc: Elkhart, IN
 
SharpShooter wrote:
As I see the parade of post on UHH, most are about TECH, cameras, lenses or how they work or what we need?!
Does anybody have to know or even care how the duel pixel focusing system in their camera even works?
Who cares what the light meter is doing, the camera can do that all by itself!
Most of the pics shot on Manual are worse than the ones shot on Auto, at least that’s what many come on here saying.
I’ve said here many times that composition is KING! So if we compose well, why do we need to know any technical BS at all?!?! Gone are the days of full manual cameras with no meters and flying by the seat of your pants.
The cameras are way smarter than we are anyway.
With only a few exceptions, do we need to know any tech at all??? Do we?
Do you, other than to sound impressive???
I say no, what do you say?!
Feel free to post some pics to show your position. How you feel knowledge of tech helped your image!
SS
As I see the parade of post on UHH, most are about... (show quote)


IMHO I think this question has come up within just about all industries. I asked at least once why I needed to know performance practices for music from the Baroque period when I had no intention of playing all that much of it. Why do I have to learn all those rules that I'll never use just to get a Bachelor's degree...then Master's degree...and then it dawned on me that education and the assimilation of knowledge just doesn't hurt anything. It might actually come in handy. Since then, I have used the various bits of knowledge that I have accumulated over the decades to pretty good effect. Can you get by without understanding how things work and why? Sure you can...if you're lucky and fate doesn't throw you a curve. My granddaughter does a great job of driving and she doesn't have a clue what makes her car go, but she'll be fine without that information...until she gets a flat tire, tries to start the car with a dead battery, or happens to see all that green colored water on the ground when she back out of the driveway. Luck is a good thing when you have some...but, knowing sure comes in handy. AND, knowing where to look to get answers to big words like "WHY" can save you a lot of time and money over a lifetime. Talent is a great thing to have and it certainly helps to separate the great ones from the good ones, but knowledge, when combined with talent can be an unbeatable combination. It might not matter so much if you knew in advance what you were going to do in life and where you would be led from day to day. Trouble is, we don't know. In lecturing to young students about careers, I often ask if they know what they want to be. There are always hands that go up with confidence. I then tell them that I doubt they are even close to knowing what they will be and what knowledge they will require to get to their destination. My advice is to learn all you can about everything in which you are interested. It's liable to come in handy some day when you least expect it.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 12:04:20   #
pesfls Loc: Oregon, USA
 
Orange Krate wrote:
A simple analogy....

An EMT is taught to do certain things for certain conditions. Basic Care. A Paramedic learns all of that plus more, and WHY they do it.

The EMT gets ~100+ hours of instruction, the paramedic 2000 hours of instruction.

Both save lives... but who has a better chance of saving you?

They both have varying levels of technology but need the knowledge to go with it.

I guess the same is true with photographers and their cameras.

Here is my position (fetal LOL):
A simple analogy.... br br An EMT is taught to do... (show quote)


As a retired 30+ yr FF/paramedic I find that an interesting analogy.

Reply
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Mar 17, 2018 12:05:52   #
BebuLamar
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Jeez, and here all this time I thought he was pianist !!! LoL
SS


He is a trained pianist and piano/music was the only formal training he had. He didn't have much in term of schooling except the music.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 12:08:38   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
SharpShooter wrote:
As I see the parade of post on UHH, most are about TECH, cameras, lenses or how they work or what we need?!
Does anybody have to know or even care how the duel pixel focusing system in their camera even works?
Who cares what the light meter is doing, the camera can do that all by itself!
Most of the pics shot on Manual are worse than the ones shot on Auto, at least that’s what many come on here saying.
I’ve said here many times that composition is KING! So if we compose well, why do we need to know any technical BS at all?!?! Gone are the days of full manual cameras with no meters and flying by the seat of your pants.
The cameras are way smarter than we are anyway.
With only a few exceptions, do we need to know any tech at all??? Do we?
Do you, other than to sound impressive???
I say no, what do you say?!
Feel free to post some pics to show your position. How you feel knowledge of tech helped your image!
SS
As I see the parade of post on UHH, most are about... (show quote)

SS wow what sensible outlook I agree 100percent! Let me just shoot and have fun!!!

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 12:10:10   #
jeffhendy Loc: El Dorado Hills, CA
 
But understanding what the technology enables you and your camera to do probably helps you to take better pictures than if you don't understand it.
Such technologies as image stabilization, low light capability, panorama etc. were unknown until fairly recently.
Smaller lighter cameras enable us to take pictures that our fathers could only dream of. See BBC Blue Planet II
So while our artistic capabilities are paramount, our ability to use the technologies that our cameras offer surely helps.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 12:11:08   #
Smudgey Loc: Ohio, Calif, Now Arizona
 
The only thing that matters is the results of your efforts, the end product, the photo. You don't need to be a mechanic in order to drive a car. If you are getting the results that you want, so be it.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.