Trump is the biggest scum bag to ever occupy the WH!
Dec 25, 2017 14:52:27 #
Dec 25, 2017 14:53:23 #
Dec 25, 2017 15:01:58 #
DaveO wrote:
Apparently he got the law changed to get some more "legal" money from the taxpayers. Did not appear to be a bi-partisan effort.
Kinda like Obama care that is destroying millions of lives.
Dec 25, 2017 15:10:38 #
idaholover wrote:
Kinda like Obama care that is destroying millions of lives.
Thank God the individual mandate was repealed.
Now get rid of subsidies so the libs pay what it costs and they will scream for obummercare to be repealed themselves.
Dec 25, 2017 15:15:49 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Architect1776 wrote:
Thank God the individual mandate was repealed.
Now get rid of subsidies so the libs pay what it costs and they will scream for obummercare to be repealed themselves.
Now get rid of subsidies so the libs pay what it costs and they will scream for obummercare to be repealed themselves.
Dec 25, 2017 15:26:37 #
sumo wrote:
you frigging idiot democrats
.....can always check the "not my President" box on your tax form this next year, and pay the higher Obama rates from last year, if you don't, you're a hypocrite.
.....can always check the "not my President" box on your tax form this next year, and pay the higher Obama rates from last year, if you don't, you're a hypocrite.
After or before we have another trickel down ression. Like we've had the last two tries of trickel down. Lol
Dec 25, 2017 15:39:25 #
dirtpusher wrote:
After or before we have another trickel down ression. Like we've had the last two tries of trickel down. Lol
The Reagan trickle down was so horrible he won 49 states, only michigan went democrat.
That must have really been horrible trickle down to win by such a narrow margin.
Dec 25, 2017 15:41:52 #
Architect1776 wrote:
The Reagan trickle down was so horrible he won 49 states, only michigan went democrat.
That must have really been horrible trickle down to win by such a narrow margin.
That must have really been horrible trickle down to win by such a narrow margin.
He only had two recessions. So how stupid are voters. Lol
Dec 25, 2017 15:51:52 #
dirtpusher wrote:
He only had two recessions. So how stupid are voters. Lol
What recessions?
Obummer had an 8 year recession.
Dec 25, 2017 16:30:54 #
Architect1776 wrote:
What recessions?
Obummer had an 8 year recession.
Obummer had an 8 year recession.
Lol
How Ronald Reagan zapped a recession with massive government spending
The Week › articles › how-ronald-reagan...
http://theweek.com/articles/642128/how-ronald-reagan-zapped-recession-massive-government-spending
Read about your denials
Why is your scum bag trump ttrying claim banners economy.
You such a loser like P boy
Dec 25, 2017 18:01:26 #
dirtpusher wrote:
Lol
How Ronald Reagan zapped a recession with massive government spending
The Week › articles › how-ronald-reagan...
http://theweek.com/articles/642128/how-ronald-reagan-zapped-recession-massive-government-spending
Read about your denials
Why is your scum bag trump ttrying claim banners economy.
You such a loser like P boy
How Ronald Reagan zapped a recession with massive government spending
The Week › articles › how-ronald-reagan...
http://theweek.com/articles/642128/how-ronald-reagan-zapped-recession-massive-government-spending
Read about your denials
Why is your scum bag trump ttrying claim banners economy.
You such a loser like P boy
PS study the Constitution and history.
Reagan was assured by the democrat controlled congress that they would cut spending.
They didn't.
The president can't spend a dime legally. Only the house can do that. But a lib would have no clue about the Constitution.
Another reason Reagan won by the largest landslide in history for his second term.
Dec 25, 2017 18:07:10 #
Architect1776 wrote:
PS study the Constitution and history.
Reagan was assured by the democrat controlled congress that they would cut spending.
They didn't.
The president can't spend a dime legally. Only the house can do that. But a lib would have no clue about the Constitution.
Another reason Reagan won by the largest landslide in history for his second term.
Reagan was assured by the democrat controlled congress that they would cut spending.
They didn't.
The president can't spend a dime legally. Only the house can do that. But a lib would have no clue about the Constitution.
Another reason Reagan won by the largest landslide in history for his second term.
At least the Congress tried to help the dumbass not like Congress did with bammer
Dec 25, 2017 18:10:30 #
Architect1776 wrote:
PS study the Constitution and history.
Reagan was assured by the democrat controlled congress that they would cut spending.
They didn't.
The president can't spend a dime legally. Only the house can do that. But a lib would have no clue about the Constitution.
Another reason Reagan won by the largest landslide in history for his second term.
Reagan was assured by the democrat controlled congress that they would cut spending.
They didn't.
The president can't spend a dime legally. Only the house can do that. But a lib would have no clue about the Constitution.
Another reason Reagan won by the largest landslide in history for his second term.
Congress acted correctly did the repukes do same for bammer... Nope. An lot people lost until after 2011. Boy your clueless
If bush hadn't asked for tarp. First. Bammer probly wouldn't got his.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.