Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Help on pros and cons of D500
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Nov 17, 2017 16:20:52   #
davefales Loc: Virginia
 
saxman71 wrote:
I have both cameras. Purchased the d7100 when it was originally introduced as a replacement for my d300. While I think it is a fine camera for many situations, I was always disappointed in its ability to capture action of any kind (birds, race horses, dancers, etc.) primarily due to its inadequate buffer size. It always seemed as if I was missing my best opportunities because the camera had to take a breather. I bought the d500 last spring and am very happy with it. The images are outstanding and the camera never craps out on you when the "best" opportunity presents itself. Additionally, low light performance is noticeably better. I would buy the d500 again.
I have both cameras. Purchased the d7100 when it w... (show quote)


That is "gold" evaluation. I skipped from the 7000 to 7200, but seriously considered the 7100 for price. If I had known your experience, I would not have even considered the 7100. Thanks.

Reply
Nov 17, 2017 16:59:18   #
Jim Bob
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Give us a an apples to apples test.


Finally some reason emerges from the den of idiocy. Thank you very much.

Reply
Nov 17, 2017 17:58:18   #
sam3 Loc: Mitchell, indiana
 
Jerry,
I have had the D500 since late April essentially replacing a D7000. This camera is tops. There are so many additional features, functions and benefits to this camera that it's a challenge to list them all. Many responses you have received have covered a lot of the great features. I would add low light shots are magnificent. I haven't missed the internal flash at all. In fact, the salesman from my camera store suggested that I hold off purchasing a remote flash until I had the opportunity to use the camera in some very low light situations. He was right to test the camera in this situation. I haven't found a need for an external flash so far. I have taken many indoor photos using aperture and adjusting ISO with no noise and no issues.

Recently I visited the Indy 500 Museum. There is plenty of light inside the museum, but sometimes color rendition becomes an issue in several areas of the museum where usually a fill flash would be used. Since I didn't have a flash I just adjusted aperture and ISO. Fill flash might have caused glare and blowout due to the high gloss finish on the cars, but that wasn't an issue.

My wife and I were on a photography shoot with two professional photographers and several other folks, I'm not a professional, recently photographing waterfalls, buildings, trains and whatever else caught our eyes. One of the pros was salivating about the D500. He shoots a lot of actors and scenes from stage plays so he needs a camera for low light without a flash and one that reacts fast. Focusing is fast, metering accurate, buffer has more than adequate space. Plus you can set this camera in four different banks so your most common adjustments for different situations is done with just a quick look at your menu to pick the right bank. Very useful.

If you decide to buy one, the current Nikon deal is a good one, you won't regret spending the money. Be sure you buy a book written by Darrel Young called "Mastering The Nikon D500". He has some great suggestions for getting the most from your camera. I carry mine every time I take the camera for a walk. Too many things to remember.

Reply
 
 
Nov 17, 2017 18:40:06   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
latebloomer wrote:
I would like opinions on a possible camera upgrade. I currently am using the Nikon D7100. It has served me well. I have been looking at the Nikon D500 at our local camera store.
This may seem silly; but, what I first liked about the D500 was that I could see the complete viewfinder view more easily than with the D7100. When I put my eye to the viewfinder I don’t have to move my eye to see the left and right sides of the view. I have checked this several times. (I am fortunate to have Wolfs Camera Store in Topeka, KS.) I have too many crop sensor lenses to change to full frame.
I like doing a lot of macro and the tilting screen seems very desirable.
Also, I am wondering if the low light performance of the D500 is a significant improvement over the D7100, since I take a lot of indoor available light informal portraits.
Is the drop from 24 pixels to 20.4 pixels a significant factor in the quality of prints enlarged to perhaps 20 x 30+ inches?

Thoughts on the above by people who have made such an upgrade to D500 or others would be appreciated.

I have an appointment coming up so I may not respond for an hour or so.

Thanks in advance,
Terry Sandlin
I would like opinions on a possible camera upgrade... (show quote)


The D500 focusing, tilting screen, touch screen and frame rate are the main improvements over the D7100. Image quality and noise are also better but not to a great extent. Also there is no flash so there is no commander mode on the camera with out an external flash. You may want to look at the D7500 which has many of the same features and better noise for far less cost.

Reply
Nov 17, 2017 20:28:21   #
Edia Loc: Central New Jersey
 
Yes! The D500 is a great DX camera. Good for sports and wildlife photography. However, if that is not what you shoot, it may not be worth the extra cost. The D7500 at half the cost and the D5600 at a third the cost may be better options for street photography, landscapes and portraits. In good light all of these cameras will perform well. Your decision should be based on what you like to shoot.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.