Sigma or Nikon
Oct 22, 2017 07:43:17 #
You can read all you want and ask for opinions but the only thing that really matters is how they perform in your own hands. Test them very carefully and side by side. Use a lens target and tripod. If you are interested, I can tell you how I do it. Minor differences in this test may not matter so you may opt based upon other features.
Oct 22, 2017 07:56:07 #
I considered the Sigma Art but I purchased the Nikon 35mm 1.4.
As pointed out by billnikon; if the two lenses cost the same, the question is not difficult.
I wanted what I trusted, not a compromise.
No regrets.
As pointed out by billnikon; if the two lenses cost the same, the question is not difficult.
I wanted what I trusted, not a compromise.
No regrets.
Oct 22, 2017 08:12:20 #
anneabc wrote:
Ok, would like to know if you could choose between the Sigma Art f1.4 or the Nikkor f1.4, which would you choose and why? I know the Nikkon is more pricey. Thanks
You hit it on the head. Sigma makes good stuff so does Nikon, the price is about the difference.
Trying to remember the warranty and I think Sigma is one year and Nikon is three or five??
Oct 22, 2017 08:31:41 #
Oct 22, 2017 08:56:22 #
I have been a Nikon shooter for 50 years, but all the Sigma Art lenses are so much better optically than their Nikon counterparts that I personally would not spend a second contemplating the Nikon offerings, even if they were significantly cheaper than the Sigmas, which they are not. It's a total no brainer for anyone not stuck on a brand name. Go to photozone.de or lenstip.com and compare the Nikon and Sigma offerings for yourself.
Oct 22, 2017 09:23:54 #
Oct 22, 2017 09:27:34 #
Oct 22, 2017 09:35:22 #
Nikkor would be my choice.
--Bob
--Bob
anneabc wrote:
Ok, would like to know if you could choose between the Sigma Art f1.4 or the Nikkor f1.4, which would you choose and why? I know the Nikkon is more pricey. Thanks
Oct 22, 2017 09:35:45 #
Oct 22, 2017 09:37:47 #
RRS
Loc: Not sure
kymarto wrote:
I have been a Nikon shooter for 50 years, but all the Sigma Art lenses are so much better optically than their Nikon counterparts that I personally would not spend a second contemplating the Nikon offerings, even if they were significantly cheaper than the Sigmas, which they are not. It's a total no brainer for anyone not stuck on a brand name. Go to photozone.de or lenstip.com and compare the Nikon and Sigma offerings for yourself.
Oct 22, 2017 10:05:01 #
When someone makes a recommendation on what used to be ... ask the question, "What have you done for me lately?"
Only someone who has used the 2 lenses you are comparing can give you a personal opinion. Beyond that you can Google all the same information their, or my, opinions are based on.
All my lenses are Nikon. I have no complaints, but something else might be better.
---
Only someone who has used the 2 lenses you are comparing can give you a personal opinion. Beyond that you can Google all the same information their, or my, opinions are based on.
All my lenses are Nikon. I have no complaints, but something else might be better.
---
Oct 22, 2017 10:10:23 #
Brucej67 wrote:
And it focuses slower, DXO doesn't always mean real world results.
A larger heavier lens may focus slower (milliseconds) but you may never notice it in actual use.
You are correct, DXO may not reflect actual use since it is conducted in laboratory conditions. In actual use many factors determine the results obtained with a lens.
DXO results provides the optical potential of a lens and is an apples to apples comparison with similar lenses. It should not be the only bases for judging a lens but is a major consideration. Why else would anyone pop for an Otus, it doesn't even autofocus.
Over the years I have owned many Nikon lenses (some very expensive) and currently own two Sigma Art lens and find them very competitive in all respects, maybe even better in some. The major tipping point is the price and for many budget is the limiting factor.
All things considered the Sigma A lenses are a better value in most cases and are only lacking with respect to weight.
Oct 22, 2017 10:24:06 #
anneabc wrote:
Ok, would like to know if you could choose between the Sigma Art f1.4 or the Nikkor f1.4, which would you choose and why? I know the Nikkor is more pricey. Thanks
Well I can guess the OP is asking about a f/1.4 50mm or f/1.4 55mm or f/1.4 35mm or perhaps a f/1.4 85mm lens. As those are probably the only ones to come in such fast versions, ever! For IQ and build Q I'd go with a FX Nikkor Lens. But that is just me and based on history and hypotheticals as I own none of the said equipment.
Oct 22, 2017 10:25:45 #
I own 3 Sigma lenses (Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 A, Sigma 180mm C Macro and the Sigma 150-600mm Sport) and the three are fine lenses I also own the Tamron 180mm Macro which is lighter than the Sigma 180mm Macro. By this I imply that I am not bias to just Nikon lenses. As to DXO based on the items mentioned in this article http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2015/01/29/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-dxos-sensor-scores I would say that they do not test based on real world comparisons nor do they provide accurate results. As you are aware of manufacturing tolerances vary for the same lens so if the copy they are testing does not have the manufacturing tolerance as another of the same lens that a customer picks up then different results may be experienced. Just my opinion.
joer wrote:
A larger heavier lens may focus slower (millisecon... (show quote)
Oct 22, 2017 10:35:34 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.