Mirrorless question
Sep 23, 2017 21:17:12 #
f8lee wrote:
Lordy you guys are denser that I thought possible.... (show quote)
The problem BOB, is the fact that YOU don't seem to understand THAT IT DOESN'T MATTER what happens before the image is collected by your eyeball. THAT IMAGE IS LITERALLY IS IMMATERIAL UNTIL YOU ACTUALLY PERCEIVE IT... and that perception, HAPPENS SLOWER THAN THE TIME IT TAKES MODERN EVF'S TO PROJECT THE IMAGE.
In OTHER WORDS; yes, the image has to be processed by the sensor, image processor, and EVF before it can be projected to your eyeball, whereas with an OVF it just bounces off a mirror. What YOU don't understand is that the amount of time it takes for modern EVF's to go through all that is LITERALLY FASTER THAN YOU CAN PERCEIVE IT...
THAT'S A FACT.
Sep 23, 2017 21:18:47 #
Cdouthitt wrote:
Not sure why I got called out in his latest rant. However what’s probably happening is that his EVF is seeing things faster than his 45+ year old photographer eyes and he’s just getting confused.
That said I still wonder if he bumped it up to the 100fps mode and actually tested it.
That said I still wonder if he bumped it up to the 100fps mode and actually tested it.
Good point AND question Clint.
Sep 23, 2017 23:17:14 #
Bill_de wrote:
I take many fewer digital pictures to get one keeper than I did with Kodachrome 25. With film I would take several variations because I could never be positive that I would get what I expected.James,
Are you saying that you don't miss the 7-10 days of anticipation waiting for Kodak to return your Kodachromes? What about the excitement of opening that yellow box and finding you have more keepers than discards?
Are you saying that you don't miss the 7-10 days of anticipation waiting for Kodak to return your Kodachromes? What about the excitement of opening that yellow box and finding you have more keepers than discards?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.