Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Right to Photograph a child in a Public Place
Page <<first <prev 21 of 21
Aug 26, 2017 20:09:47   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Hawkshaw wrote:
I think we are loosing sight of the real issue. Taking a portrait or semi-portrait picture of a child is a sensitive issue. Legalities be hanged. i have seen at least a half dozen reasons posted why a child's picture should not be taken. I think the question is "Is it OK to take a child's portrait or semi-portrait picture without permission?" I think we should take a vote. My vote is NO.


The real issue is that YES, it's ok to shoot kids, with or without permission.
Kids exhibit a youthful exuberance that makes them wonderful subjects. Whether in a 4th of July parade or Halloween, they can be great subjects and are fair game.
If you have a problem with that, ask permission, it's your right, but it's NOT the law or a moral guideline.
If a parent doesn't want their children photographed, it's best to never take them out of the house.
All that said, it's very rarely, if ever, that I post pics of children, with or without permission!
My vote is YES!!!
SS

Reply
Sep 8, 2017 07:01:58   #
ebcobol
 
There is a lot of talk and no facts. If you are going to discuss law then come up with facts not BS. This means citing actual supreme court decisions on the matter which someone already has quoted a long time ago. I have no idea what the acutual case was but if the reported claim is true that they confirmed the photographers right to take pictures in public events then it doesn't matter what the individual state laws are. If the paparazzi can take pictures of news figures then it doesn't make sense that you can't. Until someone can quote a specific ruling on this matter, it doesn't mean you should advise that the father shove anything up anyone. We have enough violence in the streets.

Reply
Sep 8, 2017 07:06:13   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Go back to bed.

Reply
 
 
Sep 8, 2017 07:25:09   #
ebcobol
 
Nussen v. diorcia ruling states that a person photographed in public without permission and later published by the photographer in a book without his consent does not violate his right to privacy. Put up or shut up and support the rights of your fellow photographers.t

Reply
Sep 8, 2017 08:21:15   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Go back to bed.

Reply
Sep 8, 2017 08:27:18   #
cedymock Loc: Irmo, South Carolina
 
This is simple if you don’t want to take a photograph of a child don’t, just don’t judge people that do! The question was about the law and about half of this 21 page thread shows information that it is not against the law

Reply
Sep 8, 2017 08:37:46   #
blackest Loc: Ireland
 
ebcobol wrote:
Nussen v. diorcia ruling states that a person photographed in public without permission and later published by the photographer in a book without his consent does not violate his right to privacy. Put up or shut up and support the rights of your fellow photographers.t


Yes in most parts of the world you have the right, however does it mean you should?

Laws can change and they will if it becomes a problem. There are harrassment laws, anti stalking laws, that may apply in any given situation.

Try not to be obnoxious and pi.. / annoy people and you will not have a problem, most of the time.

Reply
 
 
Sep 8, 2017 09:42:40   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
I tend not to focus in on individual persons. That is why I describe my photography as "like Street Photography" - my scenes may be almost like "Where's Waldo?", but I want each of those unique individuals to be acting as s/he would if I were not present.

Having said that, acknowledging that focusing in on individuals is something I'm not familiar with in practice, I believe anyone who focuses in on a child not known to him/her is just asking for trouble in the world we live in. Regardless of the legality of this practice, it is just asking for unneeded trouble.

Reply
Sep 8, 2017 11:15:13   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
rehess wrote:
I tend not to focus in on individual persons. That is why I describe my photography as "like Street Photography" - my scenes may be almost like "Where's Waldo?", but I want each of those unique individuals to be acting as s/he would if I were not present.

Having said that, acknowledging that focusing in on individuals is something I'm not familiar with in practice, I believe anyone who focuses in on a child not known to him/her is just asking for trouble in the world we live in. Regardless of the legality of this practice, it is just asking for unneeded trouble.
I tend not to focus in on individual persons. That... (show quote)

Spot on for me personally as well.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 21 of 21
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.