Afraid of history (Page 17): What churches exactly were burned down, you cockeyed bastard?

SBW

dirtpusher wrote:

Are they when they burn down churches.

What churches exactly were burned down, you cockeyed bastard?

SBW

dirtpusher wrote:

The confede
Was the Confederate army active 1963.

Or was the Confederate army active during all this.

Two thousand black churches burned between 1995-2005, but no one paid attention
http://observers.france24.com/en/20150702-usa-church-burning-arson-black-emanuel

2000 black churches burned in 10 years? Do say. Tell us more. You retarded fool.

SBW

Quinn 4 wrote:

After the war, Robert E. Lee was against having monument build and use of the battle flag. To him the war was over and time move to forward and rebuild, not looking back and build monuments to a lost war. Lee wrote that by look back South was cut itself from the way the rest of the country was going. He was right, for what happen last Sat is a remember that the South is still living in the past.

Are you retarded? Go back and read what you posted. It makes no sense, at all.

SBW

Twardlow wrote:

Here's the thing, The English considered Washington and Jefferson as traitors, and correctly, I supose.

But Robert E. Lee is considered a Traitor by his former controlmen.

He wasn't in a difficult position: he turned against the country that educated him, that supported him, and that he pledged loyalty to, in order to support a radical state that he was born to. Treason is treason/

Tell us stupid what are controlmen? Your post. No Lee was not considered a traitor by his countrymen then or now stupid. Still studied in our War College stupid. He was never called a traitor until after the Charleston Shootings a couple of years back. Totally made up by the liberals and scumbag dems like you.

mwalsh Loc: Houston

Our Chief Under-Developed Deuterostome has really been on a roll here...a soggy roll.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

mwalsh wrote:

Our Chief Under-Developed Deuterostome has really been on a roll here...a soggy roll.

You mean the degenerate.

mwalsh Loc: Houston

dirtpusher wrote:

You mean the degenerate.

No

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

Only a degenerate will use that style of language

jcboy3

SBW wrote:

That is a lie. You know it is a lie. They did no such thing. There were still slave holding states in the North after the war was over! U.S. Grant owned slaves immediately after the war was over. That is a FACT. When Lincoln issued the so-called Emancipation Proclamation (which he probably had no legal right to do) he only freed the slaves in the Southern States. You are a liar.

No. It's a fact. Many of the laws had a gradual phase in, but the laws were all passed by 1804.

jcboy3

SBW wrote:

That is a lie. You know it is a lie. They did no such thing. There were still slave holding states in the North after the war was over! U.S. Grant owned slaves immediately after the war was over. That is a FACT. When Lincoln issued the so-called Emancipation Proclamation (which he probably had no legal right to do) he only freed the slaves in the Southern States. You are a liar.

BTW, what I do know is that you are rude.

jcboy3

SBW wrote:

That is a lie. You know it is a lie. They did no such thing. There were still slave holding states in the North after the war was over! U.S. Grant owned slaves immediately after the war was over. That is a FACT. When Lincoln issued the so-called Emancipation Proclamation (which he probably had no legal right to do) he only freed the slaves in the Southern States. You are a liar.

SBW sends me a private message:

"You are lying about slave holding states in the north. You know you are, you so of a dirty whore."

What a pussy.

mwalsh Loc: Houston

jcboy3 wrote:

SBW sends me a private message:

"You are lying about slave holding states in the north. You know you are, you so of a dirty whore."

What a pussy.

Thats why we call it Soggy Butt Wipes ...

It never adds anything constructive.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

SBW wrote:

Prove it was treason, you blue gum bastard.

When you take up arms against your nation, that is treason in anyone's book

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

SBW wrote:

You can make just as sound an argument that Lincol... (show quote)

You don't understand "traitor."

That isn't it, and Lincoln was no traitor.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

SBW wrote:

You are describing yourself exactly, you son of a dirty whore.

This is the pathetic best you can do.

You have nothing to say, no contribution to add to the conversation, to further the dialogue and increase understanding, to illuminate, but you just have to say something, like "Look At Me, Look At Me!," with an empty mind, a loud voice, and a pronounced fear of not being noticed.

And your failing isn't even appropriate, witty or humorous.

Moron.