Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Bridge Camera
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jul 21, 2017 12:52:07   #
donie95 Loc: Staten Island NY
 
It's at the top end of my price range but is anyone familiar with Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

Reply
Jul 21, 2017 13:09:54   #
erinjay64
 
A 'Bridge Camera' is a bridge between the DSLR, and Point & Shoot, designs...no lens interchangeability, because it has a non removable superzoom lens; smaller, and lighter weight, than a typical DSLR.

Reply
Jul 21, 2017 13:29:58   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Damn!!! I always thought it was a camera designed to shoot bridges, like the one in the movie. I didn't shoot bridges with mine because I don't have an S36 motor drive on mine. I figured that was essential equipment to photograph any bridge and do it justice. Thanks for this explanation.
--Bob

erinjay64 wrote:
A 'Bridge Camera' is a bridge between the DSLR, and Point & Shoot, designs...no lens interchangeability, because it has a non removable superzoom lens; smaller, and lighter weight, than a typical DSLR.

Reply
 
 
Jul 21, 2017 13:47:14   #
donie95 Loc: Staten Island NY
 
Lol

Reply
Jul 21, 2017 20:19:40   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
Time to go m4/3 and ditch the big camera.

Reply
Jul 21, 2017 21:15:30   #
Digital1022 Loc: Holland, PA
 
donie95 wrote:
It's at the top end of my price range but is anyone familiar with Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10


I have been a Nikon user for 35 years. I have a Nikon D800, but I was going on an Alaska cruise in May and in Feb I bought a RX10iii. Pricey, but it allowed me to leave a lot of equipment home. I have to say that the camera was quite good and produced very good images. Shooting landscapes probably means you do not need the 24mmx600mm zoom range. However, the RX10ii comes with a Ziess 24-200 which is also a great lens. Probably worth checking it out as it is a couple hundred dollars cheaper. I have since sold the camera because I just could not get used to the different control locations. I shot a lot of wildlife and missed some shots because I just couldn't move to the controls fast enough. However, for someone who does not have a long history with a certain make of camera and who does not shoot wildlife, it might be the perfect camera. I would still highly recommend the Sony camera. Attached are a couple of images from Alaska. Hope this helps.

Ketchikan 1
Ketchikan 1...
(Download)

Ketchikan 2
Ketchikan 2...
(Download)

Sitka
Sitka...
(Download)

Reply
Jul 22, 2017 05:42:02   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
I am happy with my Sony hx100v 30x, however if I wanted to shoot in raw, based on what I've read i'd get a used canon sx-50 and learn it's quirks. and not look back.

Reply
 
 
Jul 22, 2017 05:51:02   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
donie95 wrote:
It's probably been asked and answered many times but I figured its been awhile and some new cameras are out there maybe there something I missed. I am going on vacation next month but I would prefer not to lug my giant camera with me all the time. I'm going to be shooting some landscapes And obviously some people pictures. Can anyone recommend a bridge camera that shoots Raw and has some decent manual controls. Thanks


Does it have to be a bridge, or do you simply want something smaller and easier to carry? The links below will lead you to compacts with viewfinders that shoot raw.

https://www.lifewire.com/best-viewfinder-cameras-493677
http://www.compactcamerawithviewfinder.com/
http://www.imaging-resource.com/compact-cameras-with-viewfinders

Reply
Jul 22, 2017 06:04:41   #
rayr
 
Lumix FZ 1000.

Reply
Jul 22, 2017 07:11:41   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
rmalarz wrote:
Bridge camera? Robert Kincaid used a Nikon F. I do, as well. It's small, light, and fully manual. --Bob

Bridge cameras are bulky compared to a pocket-able always with you, 24/7 superzoom. There are lots of those and the lenses and IQ are excellent... and if a little noise etc... there is Post processing.

Reply
Jul 22, 2017 07:15:28   #
Nikonman44
 
Nikon coolpix have been around for a while and are proven for sure.
I have used coolpix 4800

Its an older camera and not much as far as features but one of the most rewarding shots of the London Tower Bridge taken at 6:30 am with rolling fog turned out to be a winner.

Sold almost 300 printa of it.

Its really up to you and what you want to pay and want to do.

have fun and keep shooting.

Reply
 
 
Jul 22, 2017 07:20:03   #
Shakey Loc: Traveling again to Norway and other places.
 
If your budget is fixed buy the Panasonic Lumix FZ200 - Zoom is 25 to 600mm - Leica Lens. The sweet spot on the lens is f4. Manual to all the usual options. Try the iA Plus for incredible results. I've been using it mine since the launch date without problems. Now available at low low prices. Have a great vacation.

Reply
Jul 22, 2017 07:54:35   #
rlv567 Loc: Baguio City, Philippines
 
Bob ---

I have had the G16 for some time - it's a great camera; someday I'll learn to use its many capabilities! (In addition , I have and like the 70D.)

Loren - Glendale, AZ; now Baguio City, Philippines

Reply
Jul 22, 2017 08:05:47   #
BJW
 
I'd vote for the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000.

Reply
Jul 22, 2017 08:16:26   #
74images Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
donie95 wrote:
I hate to admit my ignorance. I am not familiar with the camera. Is it digital or film?


Digital... I Have a Canon SX-50 That's no Longer in Production I Bought in February 2014, That's a Bridge Camera With A Built in Long Zoom, That's in Between a Pocket Zoom & a D.S.L.R.

74images

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.