Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
JPEG or RAW
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jun 27, 2017 20:12:24   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
rjaywallace wrote:
Based on your description of colorblindness, I would definitely shoot Jpeg images and use something like Elements or Lightroom to make limited adjustments. Actually, your 'handicap' might turn out to be a benefit because it may force you to be careful about getting more of your images right SOC (straight out of the camera) than lazy bums like me who rely all too heavily on post-processing. I sincerely wish you great results! Please share some of your photos in the UHH Photo Gallery section. Keep in mind that monochrome (b&w) images can be very effective and don't involve the red-green issue. /Ralph
Based on your description of colorblindness, I wou... (show quote)




What he said! Good B&W is beautiful. And JPEG workflow is good for instilling exposure discipline. Do a custom white balance and your color-sighted friends won't know or care that you're color blind...

Reply
Jun 27, 2017 22:05:48   #
Lenshood Loc: Maine
 
By all means, I'd recommend shooting RAW, converting to DNG, and using Lightroom. You can do all of your color correction and output to JPEG, TIFF, and PNG. You can also choose which gamut to choose. If things fall apart, you can hit the reset button in Lightroom and you're back to square one. You can also softproof your images before printing so you can see how your image will look using various papers on your printer.

Reply
Jun 27, 2017 22:50:14   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
dsmeltz wrote:
That is true. If you actually do your own film developing then RAW is like film and JPEG is like... well dropping your film off at Photohut.


Not at all! It's more like Ektachrome or Fujichrome!

Reply
 
 
Jun 27, 2017 23:22:13   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Steve3265 wrote:
WOW I didn't realize that I would open such a raw wound on here. (sorry I couldn't resist the pun! LOL) Many of you have pointed out some very good points. I learned to shoot with B&W years ago and did my own development and printing. I loved it! From the posts here I can see where shooting RAW for B&W would be a real positive. I have not had a chance to read the articles that some of you put posts up for or review the videos but I'm looking forward to it! I hope more people will chime in on this and and those that have will continue to follow the posts and speak up with your ideas and thoughts. I really do appreciate it even if there are different schools of thought and I'm learning more as I read your posts. So thank you everyone, I really do appreciate it!!!

Steve
WOW I didn't realize that I would open such a raw ... (show quote)
Oh, a discussion of this topic always leads to this kind of discussion; rmalarz always uses his flawed pejorative "Polaroid" comment (*), etc, which is why I have been skipping this discussion.

What I definitely say, based on my actual experience, is that I use JPEG exactly as I used Kodachrome - I spend my time composing pictures and then I let professional expertise provide the final images for me, before I finally sort through them and file the ones I choose to keep.

(*) this comment has zero application to me, because I never used Polaroid and I almost always use JPEG.

Reply
Jun 27, 2017 23:23:07   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
Steve3265 wrote:
Hi everyone! I'm hoping that you can shed some light on this topic for me and which way is best to go. I know lots of people shoot in both JPEG and/or RAW formats and each has it's merits on it's own but here is my issue. I love doing post production work and I am currently using Elements 11 to do this with, which for me produces good results. The problem I have is I have never shot in RAW format and I'm partially colorblind to reds and greens. From my understanding you can do more color adjustment in RAW but with my color blindness I'm wondering if I'm better sticking to JPEG and using elements or possibly a different program for my post production. My work is strictly for my enjoyment and preserving memories of where I have been and what I have seen, and to share with family and friends. I don't enter contests or share many photos outside of my friends and family, but I still want to do the very best that I can. So here goes the conversation and suggestions. Let me know what you think and the positives and negatives for someone like myself with both formats. Thanks so much UHH family, I will look forward to your comments.
Hi everyone! I'm hoping that you can shed some lig... (show quote)


I'd suggest you go either JPEG or Raw Converted to Black & White. Personally I shoot 98% Raw. But I have normal color vision. Color, B&W, Film, Digital, 35mm to 8x10", I've done it all. It has been rumored for ages that Ansel Adams was Color Blind. Not sure as he did shoot some color Polaroids. Otherwise I've never seen an AA color photograph. So don't feel bad, you are in good company. That is a possibility too, you could try b&w film. Good luck.

Reply
Jun 28, 2017 03:02:05   #
jwohlhueter
 
Steve,
Set your camera to take both RAW and JPG and get your hands on a copy of Photoshop as fast as you can! Photoshop and Camera Raw will take your editing to another level. I am color blind myself and have been using these tools for years. They will enhance and improve the photos of the color-blind just as they do for everyone else. Dan Margulis, a member of the Photoshop Hall of Fame, in his book “Photoshop LAB Color” says about the color blind, “They appear to respond to blues at least as well as the rest of us do. Is it possible that they actually see it better? Can the color blind be picking up a distinction that’s too subtle for the rest of us? We can see colors that aren’t even on their map, but is it not possible that the converse may also be true - that the green they see is simply a color that’s out of our gamut?” Dan has taught color-blind students in his color correction classes and they perform as well as the other students. Not exactly the same of course, but have you seen some of the images perfect color perception photographers pass off as being great work? I mean really.....

Calling the color-blind photographer “handicapped”, that we should move to black and white is at the least naive and borderline offensive.

If you enjoy post production as much as it sounds you are in for a treat.

Reply
Jun 30, 2017 09:37:45   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
On further consideration, if I were colorblind, I would save my pennies and get a Leica M Monochrom! Expensive, but every pixel on the sensor is dedicated to black and white. The RAW files are great! It is expensive, but what a great camera!

Reply
 
 
Jun 30, 2017 16:02:40   #
jwohlhueter
 
Speaking as a color-blind person who has been a photographer for years I can emphatically say that, NO you would not switch to just black and white. The issue of insensitivity to the full ranges of greens and browns is very minor compared to the full range we see in all other colors. The mind and the eyes ability to compensate are remarkable. So NO, to give up woking with all colors and excepting black and white as your only outlet would be like asking someone with minor hearing loss to remove their ears. To describe the green/brown insensitivity issue as "color-blind" is part of the problem. They couldn't have picked a worse label.

I'll say this again, like I did in my previous post... Calling the color-blind photographer “handicapped”, that we should move to black and white is at the least naive and borderline offensive.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.