SonoraDick wrote:
I have pretty good (camera) equipment; still working on the first part.
I often feel about my camera the same as I do about "smart" phones... It's is a lot smarter than its operator.
You get it the wrong way! There are many bad photographers with good cameras. What I said is that there are not many good photographers with bad cameras. So if the picture is good so the photographer is good then very likely the camera is good too.
DeanS
Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
billnikon wrote:
Sorry, but that post has appeared here more times than I care to think about. Nice though.
Perhaps you should have just ignored it and skipped on by. I suspect a few newer Hoggs enjoyed the story.
salmander wrote:
I'm going to remember that response. Some people who are not photographers seem to think that the brain behind the camera has nothing to do with good photos. Anyone without experience can do it. Just point and shoot, and, voila, photos good enough to hang on the wall.
You must have wonderful brushes Mr daVinci.
dynaquest1 wrote:
I'd say semi-pro, pro and serious enthusiasts have good cameras when they can afford them. There are a lot of good photographers (who do not know they are good) who use cell phones for cameras.
My younger brother is a good example. He's 66, and his main interest in life is world travel. He has been somewhere in the world (usually for 10 to 14 days) at least 40 times. He's the best photographer I know personally, and he only uses a cell phone. He has studied art all his life, and he - gasp - "crops" his photos in-camera before he presses the shutter! They don't even need minor adjustments, from what I've seen. How can anyone do that? I'm so envious. His photos would make a better exhibition than many I've seen. He doesn't think of himself as a photographer - perhaps because he has no desire for a better camera - and, as such, doesn't think of himself as being much more than an ordinary cell-phone user who takes pictures of subjects he finds interesting.
To quote a photographer: "Great pictures are created in the mind. The camera merely records pixels."
Ignore those comments, Dean. Some members seem to lack a sense of humor.
Mark
DeanS wrote:
Perhaps you should have just ignored it and skipped on by. I suspect a few newer Hoggs enjoyed the story.
DeanS
Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
markngolf wrote:
Dean was posting an analogous "joke". Some may have missed it?
Mark
Thanks Mark. If there is a serious side to this story, I suggest it is thus: when paying a complement to someone, regardless of the subject, I consider it far more important to complement the producer rather than their equipment. This is not meant to impunge anyone or their own approach to human interaction.
Thanks for watching, and I have just dismounted from my soapbox. ๐๐๐
Kissel vonKeister wrote:
You must have wonderful brushes Mr daVinci.
What does that even mean? My post was in agreement with the general jist of the point of humor in the joke, so it looks like you thought it meant something else, which I can't imagine. Perhaps you thought that the last statement I made was serious, as in anyone can make wonderful photos, even with no experience? I thought that it was obviously a sarcastic comment. The last two sentences had the exact opposite meaning of the one before them. Did you not get it?
DeanS wrote:
An amateur photographer was invited to dinner with friends and took along a few pictures to show the hostess. She looked at the photos and commented, โThese are very good! You must have a good camera.โ
He didnโt make any comment, but, as he was leaving to go home he said, โThat was a really delicious meal! You must have some very good pots.โ
Excellent. Right on target, but non-shooters have been influenced by advertising to believe that a better camera is the answer. People buy DSLRs (sometimes expensive ones) who know absolutely nothing about how to operate them, not to mention how to make a decent photograph. And AUTO doesn't help. >Alan
DeanS
Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
SonoraDick wrote:
I have pretty good (camera) equipment; still working on the first part.
I often feel about my camera the same as I do about "smart" phones... It's is a lot smarter than its operator.
Thanks for the clarification on the equipment.๐๐๐
Here are a few similar situations:
What NOT to Say to a Professional Photographer
Are you using a compact camera? What happened to all your great gear? (Too heavy.)
I put my camera in the P, A, S, and M modes, but it still wonโt shoot videos. (Professionals take still photos, not videos.)
I love your pictures, you must have an amazing camera. (Itโs the photographer, not the camera.)
(Very similar.) Look at those terrible pictures. You need a new camera. (Again, itโs the photographer, not the camera.)
I see you have this tall tripod; you must be a professional. (Itโs not the tripod that makes great pictures.)
Iโm a fireman and Iโm looking for a less stressful, better paying occupation, some- thing like a wedding photographer. (Dealing with guests, children, and parents in a wedding is more stressful than fighting fires.)
Congratulations on winning that photography prize. I noticed the blurry area in the corner of your winning photo. Is that a new, revolutionary trend in photography? Shall I follow it? (This was a mistake that no one was supposed to notice.)
Iโm a professional photographer, but I love the iPhone, and for artistic reasons. (The iPhone is not for professionals. No interchangeable lenses and it does not even have a manual mode.)
Those are great shots of yours. Hey, we have a party this weekend. I would love you to come and take some shots. We cannot aโตord a professional photographer. (A personal, though unintended, slight.)
I can be a great photographer, only I cannot aโตord the gear. (Itโs the photographer, not the gear.)
Hey, would you like to see my photo creations. I keep them all right here, on my iPhone. (Again this iPhone.)
Letโs take a group shot before parting. Whoโs got the best camera? (Itโs the photographer, not the camera.)
MadMikeOne
Loc: So. NJ Shore - a bit west of Atlantic City
Jesterman wrote:
Too funny, when I heard it before it went. That was such a great meal you must have a great stove.
That was the version I heard, also.
DeanS wrote:
Thanks Mark. If there is a serious side to this story, I suggest it is thus: when paying a complement to someone, regardless of the subject, I consider it far more important to complement the producer rather than their equipment. This is not meant to impunge anyone or their own approach to human interaction.
Thanks for watching, and I have just dismounted from my soapbox. ๐๐๐
So when you show me your pic I will say "Wow, how the heck you get such good pictures out of that piece of junk?"
DeanS
Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
markngolf wrote:
Ignore those comments, Dean. Some members seem to lack a sense of humor.
Mark
You're spot on Mark. I thought to myself, since no one else was present, that surely if I titled the piece as HUMOR, that would be a sufficient warning that it was just a JOKE. Perhaps I made a serious error in judgement. ๐๐๐
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.