russelray wrote:
So, being unfamiliar with NVMe and with my business partner being incommunicado for a few hours, I went to do my own research on SATA vs. NVMe. I decided that although NVMe does better in most, but not all, benchmarks, they seem to do the same in actual use, probably because of the OS itself, meaning that the extra speed goes to waste, which is a pretty big waste considering that a 500 GB NVMe SSD is the same price as a 1 TB SATA SSD.
When my partner came out of his isolation, this is what he said:
"I got a Sata ssd for you because while nvme ssds perform much better in benchmarks their real-world performance is about the same because you can always find some sort of OS bottleneck that makes the extra speed go to waste. So while nvme ssds are the future, currently there's almost no point of getting them. They're just more expensive."
I can kind of understand your durability statement, but when we're at the top tier like this, I think it's probably six of one and half dozen of the other.
My current computer, a Windows 7 computer, was bought new in August 2009. So it's lasted. This new computer will, I hope, last for at least as long, if not longer. If NVMe becomes the standard and this new computer seems to be slowing, I won't have any issue replacing the SSD, or even buying a new computer with the latest and the greatest. I am, however, looking for at least 5 years, and preferably 10, from this new computer.
Thanks again for your input. Much appreciated.
So, being unfamiliar with NVMe and with my busines... (
show quote)
Truth is I have no Idea what all that stuff is. That said projecting computer hardware as well as software 10 years into the future is probably not realistic. Who knows what computertechnology will look like in 10 years. Or for that matter what cameras will look like in those 10 years.