Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Do you edit all your images?
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
May 14, 2017 13:58:42   #
Luke Cage Loc: CONUS
 
In terms of images that are edited, do you rely on in camera editing or post processing with software applications?

Luke

Reply
May 14, 2017 14:01:41   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
Luke Cage wrote:
In terms of images that are edited, do you rely on in camera editing or post processing with software applications?

Luke


pp but a lot of the images don't require much.

Reply
May 14, 2017 14:02:06   #
RichardTaylor Loc: Sydney, Australia
 
Nowdays all the published ones are post processed.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2017 14:07:47   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
A considerable number of my images are not worth pp and are deleted.

Reply
May 14, 2017 14:09:41   #
rwilson1942 Loc: Houston, TX
 
I shoot RAW, so by necessity, I edit all my images.
When I say 'all' I mean any image that I intend to export as a JPEG and post on line or print.

Reply
May 14, 2017 14:29:47   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
rwilson1942 wrote:
I shoot RAW, so by necessity, I edit all my images.
When I say 'all' I mean any image that I intend to export as a JPEG and post on line or print.


Ditto.
Not every single image.

Reply
May 14, 2017 15:18:52   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
Yes.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2017 15:22:01   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Every one of my images gets some degree of post processing attention.

Reply
May 14, 2017 15:29:46   #
Treepusher Loc: Kingston, Massachusetts
 
If it's not at least halfway decent to start with, I don't bother. "Garbage in, garbage out," as they say. But a good image can be made better by processing. It's worth doing.

Reply
May 14, 2017 15:42:05   #
Luke Cage Loc: CONUS
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Every one of my images gets some degree of post processing attention.


Understand completely. I discovered over 10 years ago the benefits of capturing images in RAW file format as opposed to JPG file format. My cameras, when converting images to JPG format, can’t compete with my brain as an image processor - neither are their in camera processors as powerful as the processors in my computers. Shooting in RAW format has provided me more flexibility with image production to make decisions on how a final image should look. Here are samples of some of my first RAW to JPG conversion, from back in 2007…


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
May 14, 2017 17:31:45   #
dhelix33 Loc: Live in Raleigh, NC - Grew up in Teaneck, NJ
 
Luke Cage wrote:
In terms of images that are edited, do you rely on in camera editing or post processing with software applications?

Luke


No in camera editing - post process and export from Lightroom.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2017 18:07:59   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
rwilson1942 wrote:
I shoot RAW, so by necessity, I edit all my images.
When I say 'all' I mean any image that I intend to export as a JPEG and post on line or print.
Same here exactly.

Reply
May 14, 2017 18:08:30   #
Erik_H Loc: Denham Springs, Louisiana
 
rwilson1942 wrote:
I shoot RAW, so by necessity, I edit all my images.
When I say 'all' I mean any image that I intend to export as a JPEG and post on line or print.

+1

Reply
May 14, 2017 18:17:55   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
I don't shoot with Canon, so I don't need to edit.

Reply
May 14, 2017 18:19:27   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
No. I shoot raw then I preview before editing. I use about 1/3 and discard the rest (leave in raw folder).

Reply
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.