kb6kgx wrote:
Thank you for your explanation. But, in my own defense, I reread all of the previous posts, including yours where you made the comment in question. You include Edia’s comment, with your response below. It appears that your comment is directed at Edia’s. You do not make reference to “warrior’s” comment, which WAS, as you said, “ignorant” and “unnecessary”.
You are right. I was not clear.