It is agenda 21 written by the global cabal. I can drive half an hour to the Georgia Guidestones and read it to you . Read the agenda 21 plan's and now agenda 30 or reduce the population to five hundred million . The Elete need servants.
Architect1776 wrote:
If there was a technology that would be of great and significant benefit to every person of the USA and improve life immeasurably but in order to obtain this technology it would be required that a randomly selected 50,000 people in the USA must die each year. Should the US allow such a technology to be implemented knowing this would be the price for obtaining this technology?
That kind of reminds me of that old movie "Silent green?" was it? I do not remember the right name of it, it was were they made cookies from people to benefit (food supply)! everybody
Architect1776 wrote:
If there was a technology that would be of great and significant benefit to every person of the USA and improve life immeasurably but in order to obtain this technology it would be required that a randomly selected 50,000 people in the USA must die each year. Should the US allow such a technology to be implemented knowing this would be the price for obtaining this technology?
The technology is already here. It's called "texting". Probably killed 50,000 drivers and innocents last year.
Cykdelic
Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
speters wrote:
That kind of reminds me of that old movie "Silent green?" was it? I do not remember the right name of it, it was were they made cookies from people to benefit (food supply)! everybody
Arghhh! Soylent green is people!
Here's the thing. Your question implies that 50,000 people would be randomly picked and executed in order for the item to available to others; thus Ken's reply (by the way Ken; I get to pick there, so there!). This is not the case. Almost every item we use today results in deaths; airplanes crash, cars crash, hikers get lost and/or fall off cliffs, etc.... This doesn't mean we don't use or allow these items to be used. It's life and everything out there whether it is common or scarce, results in deaths is no reason not to have them available. It gives reasons to take cautions and protection methods, yes, but not to ban them. Hell, we'd be back in caves if we did that for everything.
whitewolfowner wrote:
Here's the thing. Your question implies that 50,000 people would be randomly picked and executed in order for the item to available to others; thus Ken's reply (by the way Ken; I get to pick there, so there!). This is not the case. Almost every item we use today results in deaths; airplanes crash, cars crash, hikers get lost and/or fall off cliffs, etc.... This doesn't mean we don't use or allow these items to be used. It's life and everything out there whether it is common or scarce, results in deaths is no reason not to have them available. It gives reasons to take cautions and protection methods, yes, but not to ban them. Hell, we'd be back in caves if we did that for everything.
Here's the thing. Your question implies that 50,0... (
show quote)
Just quit being an a..hole and crawl back into your cave.
To answer it, yes, provided that said technology also saves lives, improves public safety, and is integral to commerce and general societal well being. This technology (cars) means we also have effective use of ambulances, police, and the operations of our military and other government operatives who work for our safety. Oh, and for commerce.
But what I want NOW is flying cars. I was promised flying cars and I don't yet see them!
Architect1776 wrote:
Just quit being an a..hole and crawl back into your cave.
You just can't stand common sense and reality. How many lives a year do cars save by getting people to the hospital in time for life saving care, or transport people out of fires, floods freezing weather or desert heat. Get real....now who should be crawling back into their cave?
Architect1776 wrote:
If there was a technology that would be of great and significant benefit to every person of the USA and improve life immeasurably but in order to obtain this technology it would be required that a randomly selected 50,000 people in the USA must die each year. Should the US allow such a technology to be implemented knowing this would be the price for obtaining this technology?
What are you on old timer??????? It's never been offered before, let he who found it be first in line!!!
n3eg
Loc: West coast USA
Architect1776 wrote:
You are absolutely right.
Cars don't kill. Guns kill.
No, seriously - drunk drivers kill people, and so do drunks with guns.
Yeah, Lets get silly with this. I'd start with a few hard heads on this forum, then i'd go through the despicable deplorables, it'd be easy to top up the 50000 allotment from there.
What do we get for that 50K, just a drop in the ocean.
n3eg wrote:
Cars don't kill. Guns kill.
No, seriously - drunk drivers kill people, and so do drunks with guns.
If guns kill, my camera is responsible for a bad exposure, my pen is guilty of mis-spelled words and my grill is responsible when my food doesn't get cooked just perfectly as I like it. Let's get real here; guns don't kill....people kill and a gun is one of many tools that people use to do the job.
whitewolfowner wrote:
If guns kill, my camera is responsible for a bad exposure, my pen is guilty of mis-spelled words and my grill is responsible when my food doesn't get cooked just perfectly as I like it. Let's get real here; guns don't kill....people kill and a gun is one of many tools that people use to do the job.
OK, lets march all gun owners down to the glue factory, recycle their guns to some thing useful, & Bingo, No more gun deaths, accidental or murder.
OH yeah, I forgot about cars, knives axes steel bars etc. Well, we got rid of most of the problem with the gun crazies.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.