Technology
Jan 20, 2017 00:19:23 #
If there was a technology that would be of great and significant benefit to every person of the USA and improve life immeasurably but in order to obtain this technology it would be required that a randomly selected 50,000 people in the USA must die each year. Should the US allow such a technology to be implemented knowing this would be the price for obtaining this technology?
Jan 20, 2017 03:39:37 #
Architect1776 wrote:
If there was a technology that would be of great and significant benefit to every person of the USA and improve life immeasurably but in order to obtain this technology it would be required that a randomly selected 50,000 people in the USA must die each year. Should the US allow such a technology to be implemented knowing this would be the price for obtaining this technology?
Depends. Can I pick them?
Jan 20, 2017 05:40:30 #
Jan 20, 2017 07:07:44 #
Jan 20, 2017 07:08:57 #
Jan 20, 2017 07:51:23 #
Architect1776 wrote:
So far a few interesting responses.
The new technology will not benefit those in the 50,000 category😟
Jan 20, 2017 07:58:53 #
Billbobboy42 wrote:
The new technology will not benefit those in the 50,000 category😟
I will wait to see if any more responses then reveal the proposed technology.
Jan 20, 2017 08:07:59 #
Jan 20, 2017 10:09:09 #
Jan 20, 2017 10:22:15 #
DavidPhares wrote:
I would guess it was the automobile.
You are absolutely right.
Jan 21, 2017 06:13:46 #
Just pick from the Darwin Awards (round 1). Must be plenty who didn't reach no.1 and complete the task to choose from.
Jan 21, 2017 08:05:37 #
Jan 21, 2017 08:35:26 #
Architect1776 wrote:
You are absolutely right.
If Steve Jobs said this about the technology would he be allowed to introduce it for sale to anyone with the money to purchase it knowing that it would be used to kill that many people randomly.
Jan 21, 2017 09:37:28 #
James Slick
Loc: Pittsburgh,PA
Architect1776 wrote:
If Steve Jobs said this about the technology would he be allowed to introduce it for sale to anyone with the money to purchase it knowing that it would be used to kill that many people randomly.
And for about twice the price of existing technology with the same "kill rate" 😲👍😁
Jan 21, 2017 10:03:38 #
Architect1776 wrote:
If there was a technology that would be of great and significant benefit to every person of the USA and improve life immeasurably but in order to obtain this technology it would be required that a randomly selected 50,000 people in the USA must die each year. Should the US allow such a technology to be implemented knowing this would be the price for obtaining this technology?
I volunteer the DNC to kick off the beta period.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.