appealnow wrote:
I am older, travel and have arthritis in one shoulder. DX is lighter body, lighter lenses. My Nikon D5300 with the Nikon 18-300 mm, 3.5-6.3 is pretty light and I can carry it all day. That was the critical thing I told the guy at the camera store; I wanted something relatively light.
Plus, I think there is a lot of disparagement of the DX cameras. I was viewing pics I took in China on my 50 inch plasma TV. I was astounded how sharp they were and very frankly I couldn't see anything wrong with the images. Since I am not a professional and don't do that critical work, the DX is fine. I really wasn't factoring in cost, but if the advances in digital continue, it would seem like replacing one's camera every 5-8 years might be in order.
I am older, travel and have arthritis in one shoul... (
show quote)
1,152.0 mm × 648.0 mm (45.35 in × 25.51 in) is your typical size of a 52" screen giving 75.xx ppi
Actual camera pixels can't be seen at that size.