Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

Can you not read? Is your reading comprehension that bad? What part of what I said did you not understand? Shall we go over it together, word by word? Here it is again. Now try to pay attention this time:

Both were scientific polls that compiled a proportion of democrats, repubs, etc., that match the overall electorate. You can go and read the details on their methodology.

In other words, they are not those bullshit instant self-reporting, self-selecting internet polls where Trump trolls can rig the vote by voting an endless number of times...

Now, what part did you not understand?


Both of these scientific polls are transparent with their methodology and how they chose the samples.

You can go to their web sites where you can read all about their methodology and scrutinize it for yourself.

RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida

Most people in the information gathering business know that the greatest difference dividing this country is not race. The greatest divide is one of urban vs rural life.

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

They were scientific. What does scientific mean to you? Does it mean relating to science or does it mean organized. If organized, in what manner?
Proportion is part of the whole. Well no shit Sherlock. I realize they didn't poll all republicans and all democrats. There is a new book out called "dictionary". You should get one. You are avoiding my question. Are you ignorant (look that up) or are you just trying to bullshit your way through my question? It has come to me that you don't know the answer to my question so you go in the attack. At least Hillary says "I don't recall."
You do realize that that you appear to have egg on your face don't you?

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Oh,boy,a mensa meeting!

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

Look, I've been very clear trying to explain things to you, but you stubbornly refuse to listen and you play dumb and continue to put words in my mouth and throw insults because I don't adopt your right wingnut distortion of reality. You do this quite often when discussing other matters as well from my experience. This is your typical behavior.

I'm tired of repeating myself. I've told you what you can do to check the methodology and see for yourself how the samples were chosen. If you are skeptical of the methodology of those polls, I've told you how you can go and scrutinize their methodology yourself. As I've already told you, both organizations are transparent with their methodology and sampling methods and have published all the details on the web for you to scrutinize. But you have refused to do that. Repeatedly. Instead, you just want to whine and insult. You just want to sit back and make baseless charges and imply that the polls are biased and invalid, without offering any evidence, even though it would be a very simple matter for you to go and check it out for yourself. You obviously have no interest in checking things out to verify whether or not your assertions are true, and instead prefer to make baseless attacks, calling me ignorant, accusing me of trying to bullshit, telling me I have egg on my face, and then you laughably accuse me of attacking you!!! Something is wrong with your cognitive process. Additionally, you are an obnoxious and disingenuous ass. Your agenda is as transparent as water. You are a fraud, Wrangler.

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

If you look back, you will notice that it was you who cited a poll. I simply asked for the sample. You obfuscate and started casting aspersions on my character and intelligence. I followed your lead. You finish by calling me ass. You still refuse to answer my question probably because you are dumber than a box of hammers. There is no sense in continuing our discussion. In a battle of wits, you are relatively unarmed.

rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA

Have to remind you again, William Jefferson Clinton is not on the ballot.

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

Wrangler: I simply asked for the sample. You obfuscate and started casting aspersions on my character and intelligence.

Keenan: MY god, what the hell is the matter with you? I explained to you 3 times how you can go scrutinize and look at the samples and methodology of the polls. A grade school kid could understand what I wrote. What is it you need me to do for you? Hold your hand and walk you through every mouse click and keyboard press and then read to you everything on every page? By this I now have to assume that when you ask someone where the bathroom is, that you require that person to hold your hand and walk you to the bathroom, pull down your pants, and hold your weenie while you piss, or wipe your ass for you after you take a shit and then flush the toilet for you? And that anything short of that will be considered by you to be a failure to answer your question and to be engaging in obfuscating and casting aspersions on your character???


Wrangler: There is no sense in continuing our discussion.

Keenan: Finally you said something accurate! Never have you made a truer statement than this! Now, leave me alone. I'm tired of your stupid games.

soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca

I won't be surprised if Hillary wins but happy if Trump does.

ken hubert Loc: Missouri

Keenan gets his ass handed to him again

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

Look dipshit, the burden of proof lies with the affirmative.
You just don't know when to stop do you!! I am sure it is difficult for you if you have constipation of the brain and diarrhea of the mouth. Are you a masochist?

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

Oh, so you lied again when you said that it is useless to continue this conversation? You sure lie a lot.

OMG, are you really this fu**ing stupid, or are you just pretending to be this fu**ing stupid that you can't see that I gave you the proof? DUMBASS, you still have not bothered to even look at the proof I provided you. Now the ball is in your court. But you want to sit here and claim that I didn't give you any??? What the f**k is wrong with your brain???

I provided you 2 scientific polls that are considered credible by the industry because they use methodology that is transparent and considered valid and scientific.

Now, if YOU don't want to accept the proof I provided you, then YOU need to show me specifically why you don't accept their methodology and samples after looking at their methodology and samples like I asked you to do. Fucking look at it, dipshit, and then show me what they did wrong. What part of this are you not understanding?

Christ! I feel like I'm talking to a preschool kid. Did you even make it through grammar school?

But you have refused to even look at their methodology and samples. WTF? WHY? Seriously, are you on drugs? Why are you playing this game with me?

Look, I'm done wasting my time with your stupid ass. Get someone else to explain it to you now.

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

If you can't prove something to others. Baffle them with bullshit. Sir, you are the master of bullshit. Don't you realize that you are a laughing stock.

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

One more time, FUCKING GO LOOK AT THE PROOF I PROVIDED TO YOU AND POINT OUT WHY YOU REJECT IT.

The ball is in your court. Have you looked at the samples and methodology yet? Why not?

What is it that you don't comprehend?

Which of the following words do you need help with?

Look

at

the

proof

I

provided

you

and

point

out

specifically

why

you

reject

it

......................

Now, which words are you having trouble with?