WNYShooter wrote:
Common sense CLEARLY says that if a bad guy is shooting at a good guy, and the good guy has no gun, the good guy has a slim chance of living, but a good guy with a gun to fight back with, at least has a chance. Also, you must keep in mind, every scenario presents it's own unique set of circumstances which will ultimately dictate the outcome, but arguing that being unarmed is universally the best way to handle all, that just completely defies common sense, and data fully supports that as well.
I would rather die fighting then die without fighting.