Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Need analysis of this photo !!!
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Apr 26, 2016 02:00:23   #
sstan4you Loc: the little valley, ca
 
this is "sharp" for the sig @500mm

Reply
May 8, 2016 01:24:44   #
tinwhistle
 
sstan4you wrote:
this is "sharp" for the sig @500mm


I tend to agree with this comment regarding this lens, although I also have found that the focus point on the image in question is off to the right in the vicinity of the galvanized pipe. My personal summation of this image is: point of focus, pay close attention to your ISO and aperture settings and use a good tripod.

Reply
May 9, 2016 09:18:34   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
As I am coming late to this party, if this has been mentioned before , forgive me. You said that this photo was made with a window beanbag. was the engine running? If so cars vibrate whe the engine is running, so this may be camera shake. Just saying

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2016 10:04:33   #
Madman Loc: Gulf Coast, Florida USA
 
sstan4you wrote:
this is "sharp" for the sig @500mm


Do you own or use a Sigma 150-500 lens? I assume that you do not because if you did and you couldn't get better quality photographs than the one shown by the OP with it, something is awfully wrong, either with you equipment or your skills.

I don't have one, but I have a brother that does. Both he and I can easily get extremely sharp, high quality images from it. Other members of this forum use this lens and regularly post excellent photos taken with it.

Your statement only fans the fire, it does nothing to help the OP solve his issue.

Reply
May 9, 2016 10:18:54   #
chaman
 
Madman wrote:
Do you own or use a Sigma 150-500 lens? I assume that you do not because if you did and you couldn't get better quality photographs than the one shown by the OP with it, something is awfully wrong, either with you equipment or your skills.

I don't have one, but I have a brother that does. Both he and I can easily get extremely sharp, high quality images from it. Other members of this forum use this lens and regularly post excellent photos taken with it.

Your statement only fans the fire, it does nothing to help the OP solve his issue.
Do you own or use a Sigma 150-500 lens? I assume t... (show quote)


Well said. This is what is needed here!

Reply
May 11, 2016 23:21:05   #
greg vescuso Loc: Ozark,Mo.
 
I haven't read everyone's reply to your post so if someone already said this, sorry.
I have this lens and it does need a lot of light so being underexposed doesn't help. But l
Your focus is not really sharp anywhere and since you had the lens on a bag in a window I would bet you had the optical stabilizer switch on and that is why your image isn't sharp.

Reply
May 14, 2016 16:27:51   #
davidrb Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
 
acellis wrote:
All: I can't for the life of me figure out what I am doing wrong. I am having a terrible time getting sharper pictures.

Here is an example of a picture. it is really muddy looking. Yes weather was heavily overcast but this does not explain it does it? It's happening more often than not now a days. Very discouraging.
Nikon d7100 with a Sigma 150-500mm lens.

Focal length 500mm
Shutter - 1/750
Aperture 8.0
ISO - 400
On window beanbag
Lightroom cc used to process -- no processing done on this example.
All: I can't for the life of me figure out what I ... (show quote)


You've just about answered your own question. 500mm might be considered a little far for beanbag stability so you upped you shutter? Too fast for f/8 at 1/750 and ISO 400, don't you think? Your background gives that away, it's very blurred. The bird is not really sharp focus but the forward bar on the ladder is more so. On what was your focus? That might be your problem but you really need to get on a more stabilized platform, beanbags don't cut the mustard! If you are serious enough to be using 500mm lenses you should be more serious about on what you mount it. Even using a stable shooting platform you are asking your camera for a lot of luck. You were pressing that luck using those shooting parameters in less than bright sunlight. You were way under exposed when you did not need to be. What was your meter showing?

Reply
 
 
May 15, 2016 09:30:42   #
JCam Loc: MD Eastern Shore
 
Not sure I fully agree with you even though that is what many photographers preach. I consistently use upwards of 1/1000-1800+ at about 250mm with my Tamron 70-300 mm (perhaps with a higher that my usual ISO on hazy/dull days) when I'm on the boat to offset my and the subject boats both moving. It's the subject boats I want in sharp focus. If the background, boats or shoreline, are blurred so much the better; they are distractions from what I want to show.

Reply
Jun 15, 2016 23:56:34   #
Howard5252 Loc: New York / Florida (now)
 
acellis wrote:
All: I can't for the life of me figure out what I am doing wrong. I am having a terrible time getting sharper pictures.

Here is an example of a picture. it is really muddy looking. Yes weather was heavily overcast but this does not explain it does it? It's happening more often than not now a days. Very discouraging.
Nikon d7100 with a Sigma 150-500mm lens.

Focal length 500mm
Shutter - 1/750
Aperture 8.0
ISO - 400
On window beanbag
Lightroom cc used to process -- no processing done on this example.
All: I can't for the life of me figure out what I ... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.