Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
DLSR Shooting Check List
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jan 25, 2016 07:44:35   #
Julian Loc: Sarasota, FL
 
JD750 wrote:
I have developed a list of things to check, and some tips, that help me avoid missing important shots, time wasted trying to figure out what the he__ the camera is doing, or having to spend hours in post and getting substandard results fixing the effects created by a mistaken setting.

This list and the tips below it, are really for those new to DSLR's.

Because the old crusty pros and even us experienced amateurs are much wiser and would never make a mistake with camera settings. ;) However all are invited to comment, deride, endorse, etc.

(1) WB
(2) ISO
(3) Aperture
(4) Shutter

(5) Metering
(6) Focus settings & image stabilization
(7) Shooting Format (Raw/JPG - quality, size)
(8) Shutter Mode (Single, continuous, 10s timer,…. etc)

(9) Battery Level
(10) No Shots remaining on card


1-4 every time you put the camera to your eye <- DO THIS
1 - 10 when you pull the camera out of the drawer/before a session
5-8 when “default” settings were changed for a special case*
9-10 periodically during the day/night/session

*TIP: When changing default modes (5)-(8) for a special case, always put the settings back to default when done

TIP: Never leave the camera sit without a memory card. Replace the card immediately after downloading images.

TIP: When the memory card is removed for downloading, leave the camera access door open as a reminder.

TIP: if you like to keep images on the memory card after downloading, when replacing the card, shoot a black frame. The next time you insert the card in the computer for download, sort by date or number, then the black frame makes it easy to see where the new images start.

TIP: Do not "touch" images stored on the memory card. Do not rename them or erase them on the memory card using the computer. Do that work on the images stored on the computer hard drive. Reformat the card using the camera if you want to clear the card for the next shoot.
I have developed a list of things to check, and so... (show quote)


My flight instructor told me once: "When you think you can fly without a check list, you need to fly no more" How true about photography as well. :thumbup:

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 08:09:56   #
DaveMM Loc: Port Elizabeth, South Africa
 
JD750 wrote:
I must be frickin dyslexic. I got this post's title wrong and I just noticed this, and now it is too late to edit the title.
It is a well known problem that proof-reading your own work is very unlikely to pick up many errors. It is almost impossible for you to see some of them as you are still thinking of what you thought you wrote!

It is also amazing that, if all the letters are there, we can read exactly what is written even when only the first and last letters are in the right place. Here is an extreme example - read it fast:

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdgnieg

THE PAOMNNEHAL PWEOR OF THE HMUAN MNID

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh?



Don't worry - I had to read the title three times to spot the error. So you are probably not dyslexic, just normal!

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 08:53:59   #
djlouden Loc: Ocala, Florida
 
Thanks for the ideas. A little reminder never hurt anyone.

I always put my walk around (ride around) camera in all auto/program function when I put it in the car. Sometimes situations come up where you want to shoot right out of the box and don't want to stumble resetting from your last shoot.

Happy Shooting

Reply
 
 
Jan 25, 2016 08:55:15   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
rpavich wrote:
Seeing a list like this makes me glad I shoot a film camera with no features like AF, or IS, and no need for batteries or WB adjustment, etc.

As long as the lens cap is off I'm good to go. :)


Ah, but don't you need to make sure the batteries are fresh in your Sekonic, and if you are shooting color transparency you'd have two basic choices, daylight or tungsten, and you'd have to make more subtle color changes after taking some measurements with one of these handy little devices.

Not to mention the fact that color response on color reversal film is fluid, and requires a test roll, to which you determine the correct basic filter pack for the entire emulsion run. Then add additional filtration for the lighting conditions. So you'd have to keep a bag full of Wratten CC gels, to get the right color.

I used to use the Minolta and Spectra Cine 3 Color Meter - both analog and quite fussy - back in the day.

Trust me, after all of that, I welcome some of the creature comforts of shooting digital, and given that I spend have my time shooting wildlife, mostly birds with long lenses, I do welcome Autofocus - I could never be as accurate or consistent with my old Novoflex Follow Focus lenses as I am with my current AF lenses and bodies. You've seen some of my work so you know what I am talking about.

On the other hand, I do miss microprism and split prism focusing screens, especially when I use my prime lenses - 24, 45 and 85mm PC-E - which is primarily what I use when I am not shooting wildlife.



Reply
Jan 25, 2016 08:56:43   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
rpavich wrote:
Seeing a list like this makes me glad I shoot a film camera with no features like AF, or IS, and no need for batteries or WB adjustment, etc.

As long as the lens cap is off I'm good to go. :)


You guys got really hammered with the snowstorm. We got 22 inches in Yonkers, 26 in Manhattan. Glad it's over.

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 08:57:59   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
Gene51 wrote:
Ah, but don't you need to make sure the batteries are fresh in your Sekonic, and if you are shooting color transparency you'd have two basic choices, daylight or tungsten, and you'd have to make more subtle color changes after taking some measurements with one of these handy little devices.

Not to mention the fact that color response on color reversal film is fluid, and requires a test roll, to which you determine the correct basic filter pack for the entire emulsion run. Then add additional filtration for the lighting conditions. So you'd have to keep a bag full of Wratten CC gels, to get the right color.

I used to use the Minolta and Spectra Cine 3 Color Meter - both analog and quite fussy - back in the day.

Trust me, after all of that, I welcome some of the creature comforts of shooting digital, and given that I spend have my time shooting wildlife, mostly birds with long lenses, I do welcome Autofocus - I could never be as accurate or consistent with my old Novoflex Follow Focus lenses as I am with my current AF lenses and bodies. You've seen some of my work so you know what I am talking about.

On the other hand, I do miss microprism and split prism focusing screens, especially when I use my prime lenses - 24, 45 and 85mm PC-E - which is primarily what I use when I am not shooting wildlife.
Ah, but don't you need to make sure the batteries ... (show quote)

Actually, no to all of that. :)

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 08:58:49   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
Gene51 wrote:
You guys got really hammered with the snowstorm. We got 22 inches in Yonkers, 26 in Manhattan. Glad it's over.


Me too!

Reply
 
 
Jan 25, 2016 09:01:05   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Also, check to make sure that you have not inadvertently turned on bracketing. I had done this, forgotten about it, and it really skewed things when I was shooting in aperture priority.

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 10:04:08   #
BebuLamar
 
JD750 wrote:
Hard to check? Maybe it's harder to check WB on some cameras than others.

Some people say that WB doesn't matter with raw. I personally don't agree. First I like to spend the minimum time in post. When I open a raw file it opens displaying the camera's white balance setting, which I can change if I want. But I personally don't want to have to change it on 500 pictures because it was set wrong in the camera. And if I was shooting different lighting situations, like outside all day, morning mid-day evening, sunny cloudy shady, and I forgot to set WB accordingly, then that is a real mess to fix. I consider that a complete waste of time.

Second, even with raw, there are differences in the WB choices based on post processing software used. Again, it takes some additional time to get it right in post.

But some people like working and spending time in post and that's fine if that is what they like.
Hard to check? Maybe it's harder to check WB on s... (show quote)


The aperture, shutter speed and ISO are always in the viewfinder. To check WB I have to push the button in the back.

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 10:07:02   #
dynaquest1 Loc: Austin, Texas
 
rpavich wrote:
Seeing a list like this makes me glad I shoot a film camera with no features like AF, or IS, and no need for batteries or WB adjustment, etc.

As long as the lens cap is off I'm good to go. :)


Yeah but the tradeoffs are huge: Find film, buy film, load film, stuck with one ASA/ISO, only 12/24/36 exposures, no preview, unload film, drive to processor, drive home, drive to processor, pay money, throw away the bad ones...then have to scan to share. ;-)

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 10:14:19   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
rpavich wrote:
Seeing a list like this makes me glad I shoot a film camera with no features like AF, or IS, and no need for batteries or WB adjustment, etc.

As long as the lens cap is off I'm good to go. :)



When I was shooting film, when the kids were growing up, I had rolls of film that I couldn't afford to develop because of the cost, and then when I did, I was only happy with a few shots. Between the cost of film and processing, it cost a minimum of fifty cents per shot....back in the seventies and eighties. Today, my daughter can shoot as many shots of the grandkids as she wants.....free. I'm more than happy that digital came along.

I do know what you're talking about, though. Some of the best shots I ever took were with my Canon ftb. All I had lens wise was a 50mm f1.4 and a Sigma 80-300mm (no vr in those days). You're right....photography was simpler....and we thought about our shots ahead of time. A roll of film might last for months.

Reply
 
 
Jan 25, 2016 10:16:30   #
trigger finger Loc: Beautiful Polk Co. Fl.
 
Listen I'm no expert and this is a good tip! I shoot with the white balance on auto but all the rest is very relevant to me. I can't count the number of photos, check that pictures, check that shots, yea that's more like it, that I've wasted because of the wrong setting. The time wasted on the computer processing images one after another trying to salvage something out of the wrong setting. This helps out a guy like me. I'm going back and reread the tips again to keep it fresh in my mind. Thank You JD750

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 10:22:49   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
trigger finger wrote:
Listen I'm no expert and this is a good tip! I shoot with the white balance on auto but all the rest is very relevant to me. I can't count the number of photos, check that pictures, check that shots, yea that's more like it, that I've wasted because of the wrong setting. The time wasted on the computer processing images one after another trying to salvage something out of the wrong setting. This helps out a guy like me. I'm going back and reread the tips again to keep it fresh in my mind. Thank You JD750
Listen I'm no expert and this is a good tip! I sho... (show quote)


I even had a problem that the UHH guys didn't figure out. I was using aperture priority and when I changed ISO strange things were happening. The shutter speed was not as expected and I was getting ev compensation, and the photos were not identical. Nobody could figure it out, but I called Arlington Camera and talked to somebody who knew Nikon's in an out and he told me that I must have turned bracketing on. Sure enough, I'd turned bracketing on at sometime in the past. One thing about these cameras, you really have to get to know them and how they work. The check list is a very good idea.

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 10:34:41   #
bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.
 
SteveR wrote:
I even had a problem that the UHH guys didn't figure out. I was using aperture priority and when I changed ISO strange things were happening. The shutter speed was not as expected and I was getting ev compensation, and the photos were not identical. Nobody could figure it out, but I called Arlington Camera and talked to somebody who knew Nikon's in an out and he told me that I must have turned bracketing on. Sure enough, I'd turned bracketing on at sometime in the past. One thing about these cameras, you really have to get to know them and how they work. The check list is a very good idea.
I even had a problem that the UHH guys didn't figu... (show quote)


Been there done that. Couldnt figure out what was happening , then I went down every menu item and checked it and yup bracketing was on.

as for the list, I NEVER leave the battery/card door open, that is the easiest way to break it off that I could think of.

when Im done shooting for the day, I set the camera to
ISO400 F8 1/125 Wb on auto . This way if I jump out of the car to take a shot of bigfoot , I wont have time to make any changes and I'll surely have something to work with in PS.
Not many reports of BF in philly though.

when I jumped out of the car to shoot the flying saucer I didnt have these settings , the pic was completely black,
so I missed the once in a lifetime shot, or it could be that ET did something to my camera.... or maybe it was just an airplane . we'll never know cause I dont have the pic.

Reply
Jan 25, 2016 10:38:09   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
dynaquest1 wrote:
Yeah but the tradeoffs are huge: Find film


No biggie...I have tons and you can buy it everywhere.

Quote:
, buy film,


Same answer

Quote:

load film,


Really? What's so hard about that? I shoot a roll or two a week so I spend 30 or 40 seconds loading film twice a week.

Quote:
stuck with one ASA/ISO,


Yeah?

I don't see that as a disadvantage at all. And with chems like diafine, I can push one 400 speed roll from 400 to 3200 with no issues.

Quote:
only 12/24/36 exposures, no preview, unload film,


Again..I see this as an advantage not a disadvantage at all.


Quote:
drive to processor, drive home, drive to processor, pay money, throw away the bad ones...then have to scan to share. ;-)


I process my own film, no driving, I can scan a whole roll automatically in 5 minutes while doing something else.

I don't see how any of this is a big deal, in fact, it's refreshing given the long list in the OP.

That's why I posted what I did.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.