minniev wrote:
Last weekend I took a photo that bothered me, and I would appreciate opinions and feedback about the image and/or about the issues I'm raising. Please include your own photos (or not), they are welcome.
I am not a street photographer, but do dabble in it especially when I go to New Orleans. Ive always taken pictures of interesting local characters, homeless people, tourists - some with their permission, some without their knowing, some candid and some posed. I wouldn't call any of them portraits.
This one seems more of a portrait to me. And, it has been bothering me more than other photos Ive taken secretly or openly.This young man came by as I got out of the car before 7 AM, asking for money. His trouble was easy to spot. He walked with us a couple of blocks towards an area where others had already congregated or slept the night before. I asked for a photo which he gladly obliged. He is somebodys child, bogged down on a bad road, and he has made me sad every time I scan past this image. If it makes me feel bad, does that mean I should not have taken it? Why did this one bother me so? Maybe because I have sons and grandsons, maybe because he was so young, or maybe it was the cat...
Technically, I had issues with lens fog, which even with the best precautions is unavoidable immediately after you step into New Orleans in August. I didnt try to mitigate that in post. I didnt try to mitigate anything. I will attempt editing improvements if some are suggested.
But the ethical/philosophical question I am asking is if any of you who do street photography feel conflicted about some of the images you take, and what you do about that.
Last weekend I took a photo that bothered me, and ... (
show quote)
I don't see any problem here. You asked, he agreed. Unless you use this photo commercially there is no problem. It's a pleasant picture. A man and his best friend.