New Topaz Remask 5
Sep 1, 2015 15:46:01 #
Bill Houghton wrote:
I feel it also helps when you have more than on set of eyes looking at it.
No question about that.
Sep 2, 2015 07:47:39 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Seeing all the skin artifact I would say that either you do not know what you are doing yet or this a really bad program. Belongs in Gallery or photo analysis?
Rongnongno, you broke your own rule: "Do not post pictures in any of the threads I create unless you are specifically invited to." Is that rule for everyone, excluding you in other's posts. Photos posted here cleared the problem... and cleared the reputation of Remask 5
In the words of Ron Reagan " There you go again" Wrongnogo! Before you condemn Topaz Remask, why not take the time and effort to try it your self or to ask the poster for a direct comparison of the face before and after... if that shows Topaz to be a problem then I will call you RightKnowKnow.
The photo's coagulated jello texture is probably in the original photo. Topaz DeNoise, Detail, Clarity, the Remask would have been my work flow.
The freshly revised program, version 5, introduced last week in August, is an improved version of 4. I suggest that others reading this post download a 30 day trial of Topaz Remask.
As usual, Topaz did not charge us for the update. I have had this program from the intro.
Sep 2, 2015 07:49:00 #
Sep 2, 2015 10:02:35 #
dpullum wrote:
double post ooops
You just might want to lose your interest in me. You have to be ill to do such a thing.
My request not to post addresses ONLY my posts. If for illustration purposes I need to post a picture or a sample I do so w/o remaking anyone using the poster's own image.
This is something I always do so....
Once again 'Yawn'. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Sep 2, 2015 10:46:41 #
I think your work is quite acceptable. The average viewer is not going to notice the imperfections that photography purists might point out. The images look quite good on my monitor, and I'm sure family would be quite impressed. Topaz Remask 5 is a great program. With continued practice, I'm sure you could fool the purists:)
Sep 2, 2015 15:55:28 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Seeing all the skin artifact I would say that either you do not know what you are doing yet or this a really bad program.Belongs in Gallery or photo analysis?
You did a fine job with ReMask. The comments made have nothing to do with ReMask. If you would like to see some comments that Rongnongno made about my work, and my response, go to FORGET THE ALLIGATORS!!! There are two postings- Not the Part two posting. It'll be the one with the tiger.
Sep 3, 2015 02:49:59 #
I bought ReMask5 about a week ago because it was on sale and have had no time to play with it yet. These results are encouraging :wink:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.