Bram boy wrote:
I have the same lens 70-300 mm vr . And the write up by Thom hogan
The Garu for of nikon . Says it should cost twice as much for what you get
. The optics are comparable to a $1200 lens . If you would like to see some
Bird shots I have taken with mine , send me your emale , Fred
Paflyer, if the lens you posted a photo of is your lens, it is NOT the VR lens that Bram boy was talking about. It is the older version without VR and requires a focus motor in the camera. It is an ok lens but not nearly as good as the newer lens. I have the D lens myself and it is tolerable at best. It is slow focusing and not always on focus for moving shots because of it's speed. it is a f/4 to f/5.6 f stop so your going to have to either shoot higher iso or very slow shutter speeds in anything but good light. Don't get me wrong, it is a good lens but there is a reason Nikon decided to upgrade it and the new one is way above the older one... The old one retails new for $173 and the new one retails new for $590.. they are both the same f/stop but the newer is an AFS lens and much faster focusing. The lens you show in the photo is the older lens.