RAW help, please
Mar 23, 2012 18:11:21 #
Mar 23, 2012 18:18:14 #
beverett wrote:
High ISO, underexposure, noise reduction not used.
It actually looks pretty good to me for ISO 3200. His hair may be a little over but the rest acceptable for a casual shot.
Mar 23, 2012 18:39:37 #
Thanks, CAM1017. Actually his hair just lacks contrast with the background. The only white near blowout is the nametag. But I displayed the picture to show how proper exposure and noise reduction can work to make an acceptable image even at a high ISO. My comment posted with the picture--"underexposure, high ISO, lack of noise reduction"--was in reference to the problem photo posted earlier.
Mar 23, 2012 18:51:44 #
English_Wolf wrote:
200 ISO DX40 Download and compare.
Had to reload both, using the same prtscr.
photogrl57 wrote:
You asked for itYeah I wasn't real impressed with that ... it didn't do the same experiment at a lower ISO .... show me one that proves that with an ISO of 100 .. :)
200 ISO DX40 Download and compare.
Had to reload both, using the same prtscr.
To any who think the 1/125 underexposed VS 1/25 does not show high noise I say download both and adjust level on the under exposed to match normal's level - EW's theory holds.
Mar 23, 2012 19:15:34 #
I am not sure what this picture has to do with the whole thread but then again, anything goes now.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.