Tamron or Nikon 70-200?
Jun 6, 2015 10:13:12 #
Bram boy wrote:
am I reading this right . Your going to get both of these . So your gaining
70mm to 140 mm on the front end with the 70mm -300 mm as in the next few days your getting a 150-600 , on the top end of that your only gaining
300 mm over what your getting on the first one . I would just get the 150-600, and pick up nikon 35mm mm which would be normal cheep . And a 80 mm later on maybe a macro . That's big over laps on what your getting IMHO
70mm to 140 mm on the front end with the 70mm -300 mm as in the next few days your getting a 150-600 , on the top end of that your only gaining
300 mm over what your getting on the first one . I would just get the 150-600, and pick up nikon 35mm mm which would be normal cheep . And a 80 mm later on maybe a macro . That's big over laps on what your getting IMHO
A 70-300 is much easier to carry/manage when you do not anticipate needing over 300 ......
Jun 6, 2015 13:00:17 #
picsman wrote:
I currently use a Nikon D7100 body and hope to upg... (show quote)
I can't say anything about the Tamron, but the Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 is one fantastic lens. Excellent low light focusing, VR, and extremely sharp even wide open. I can highly recommend this lens.
Bob
Jun 24, 2015 08:37:47 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.