I'm convinced about the cause, but still amazed I haven't taken images like this before, considering where I live. Guess I spend too much time in the swamp.
When I looked at it I perceived the point of focus was behind the plane, in the brown field just in front of the green crop row. That area looks sharpest across from left to right.
romanticf16 wrote:
When I looked at it I perceived the point of focus was behind the plane, in the brown field just in front of the green crop row. That area looks sharpest across from left to right.
It's entirely possible that I missed focus but that alone would not account for the way this thing looks. I've shot countless OOF images and they just look OOF-blurry but not like they've been shot through bubble wrap.
Don't over look the exhaust from the engine.
minniev wrote:
Took this yesterday and cannot figure out what could have caused the wave effect, which is something like would happen if I applied a weird "frosted glass" effect in software. Trying to isolate whether camera, owner or environmental problem.
Shot with Olympus EM1, 1/2000, 6.7 ISO 400, 75-300 lens fully extended handheld. I shot other sequences both before and after with this same lens and with other lenses, at similar and different settings with none of this bizarre trouble.
I had just attached this lens for these shots but there was no message of lens error or odd readings like there usually are if a lens for some reason did not lock in.
It was not particularly hot, low 70's. Only variable I could even wonder about was whether what the crop duster was spewing out (which smelled like anhydrous ammonia) could have had some effect or there was some particulate in it, but they are cropdusting all over and I didn't see this in any other shots.
Took this yesterday and cannot figure out what cou... (
show quote)
I'd say the heat rising off the ground.
If I saw this on a rifle range, I'd chalk it up to heat mirage.
theoldcougar wrote:
Don't over look the exhaust from the engine.
I agree this is probably a contributing factor in the strangeness. I've done a lot of reading about this since the answers started coming in.
Heat waves, "heat" being relative. As others have mentioned, it's the difference between the ground temperature & the air temperature.
I have a ten acre hay field for my front yard & have seen these type of waves even in below freezing temps. I've even noticed it when the field is covered in snow. So, "heat waves" is kind of a misnomer, but it is easier than saying "difference between ground and air temperature waves".
minniev wrote:
Took this yesterday and cannot figure out what could have caused the wave effect, which is something like would happen if I applied a weird "frosted glass" effect in software. Trying to isolate whether camera, owner or environmental problem.
Shot with Olympus EM1, 1/2000, 6.7 ISO 400, 75-300 lens fully extended handheld. I shot other sequences both before and after with this same lens and with other lenses, at similar and different settings with none of this bizarre trouble.
I had just attached this lens for these shots but there was no message of lens error or odd readings like there usually are if a lens for some reason did not lock in.
It was not particularly hot, low 70's. Only variable I could even wonder about was whether what the crop duster was spewing out (which smelled like anhydrous ammonia) could have had some effect or there was some particulate in it, but they are cropdusting all over and I didn't see this in any other shots.
Took this yesterday and cannot figure out what cou... (
show quote)
Some sort of atmospheric factor showing up because of the distance between you and the plane, even though it was unexpected because it wasn't the usual summertime heat temperatures. Your camera had absolutely nothing to do with it unless they have introduced a "heatwave shimmer mode" setting recently ...
jpgto
Loc: North East Tennessee
No rocket scientist here but could it be 'heat' rising off the ground between you and the subject. That's what it looks like to me! Jeff
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
minniev wrote:
It's entirely possible that I missed focus but that alone would not account for the way this thing looks. I've shot countless OOF images and they just look OOF-blurry but not like they've been shot through bubble wrap.
The differences in density between those hotter rising bubbles of air and the rest of the cooler air is exactly like shooting through bubble wrap. If you take a very careful look at your shot, you might notice that as you go up from the bottom of the brown field it starts to get sharper until about the middle. At about the middle of the brown field, it starts to distort while it it seems to get sharper. At the top edge of the field, a long distance with a lot of heat bubbles in between, distortion due to temperature differentials takes over. There is no distortion due to engine exhaust. If one looks very carefully at the image of the plane, one will notice that one blade of the propeller is sticking up at the front of the plane. A 1/2000 of a second is not enough to stop a spinning propeller. The propeller was stopped at the time of the shot.
Again, this is a good example density lensing (Schlieren imaging). And this is not the only density lensing effect that can be photographed. Both the phenomenons of green flash and blue flash are caused by density lensing.
After further intense researching this could be the result of a low flying UFO giving off a magnetoacoustic wave. Whether this is a fast or slow magnetoacoustic wave is debatable, the fact that the UFO was interested in this, to them, outdated form of plant spraying certainly wasn't.
If the plane's engine was tunning, the hot exhaust could cause the difference in refractive index (so-called "heat waves") between the air behind the plane and the surroundings.
Thanks again to all who helped explain this puzzling effect.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.