Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
What Could Have Caused This?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
May 2, 2015 16:38:32   #
lightcatcher Loc: Farmington, NM (4 corners)
 
minniev wrote:
The difference in the temp of camera vs plane? Or in the air between me and the plane? This is very interesting. How can I learn more about it? Since I'm accustomed to shooting in hot climate, I'm amazed I've never run into it before. It does look like heat shimmer though a little more blocky than I'd guess it would be. I've taken photos of crop dusters before, and had them come out sharp. I'm trying to understand the variables. I appreciate the science lessons.



Heat rising from the ground between you and the airplane.

Reply
May 2, 2015 16:42:50   #
jethro779 Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
minniev wrote:
The difference in the temp of camera vs plane? Or in the air between me and the plane? This is very interesting. How can I learn more about it? Since I'm accustomed to shooting in hot climate, I'm amazed I've never run into it before. It does look like heat shimmer though a little more blocky than I'd guess it would be. I've taken photos of crop dusters before, and had them come out sharp. I'm trying to understand the variables. I appreciate the science lessons.


This is the same basic concept as mirages in the desert. That air is heated and as it heats it also rises. When it reaches the altitude where the air is colder the heat is pulled out of the air and forms a vapor that then falls back to earth in the form of mist. As this mist falls it is rewarmed and starts to rise again. this is what causes the shimmer and the effect of seeing water ahead of you.

Reply
May 2, 2015 16:58:21   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
minniev wrote:
The difference in the temp of camera vs plane? Or in the air between me and the plane? This is very interesting. How can I learn more about it? Since I'm accustomed to shooting in hot climate, I'm amazed I've never run into it before. It does look like heat shimmer though a little more blocky than I'd guess it would be. I've taken photos of crop dusters before, and had them come out sharp. I'm trying to understand the variables. I appreciate the science lessons.


What you have is a type of Schlieren imaging or photography. "Schlieren photography is a visual process that is used to photograph the flow of fluids of varying density. Invented by the German physicist August Toepler in 1864 to study supersonic motion, it is widely used in in aeronautical engineering to photograph the flow of air around objects." (Quote from Wikipedia - I just could not state it better) Think of the "bubbles" of air coming off that field like they were low density marbles and you are shooting through the marbles. With a strong enough breeze, the "bubbles" get broken up and smoothed out no matter what the "heat". That is why the effect is not always seen.

Reply
 
 
May 2, 2015 17:29:06   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
minniev wrote:
... I'm trying to understand the variables. I appreciate the science lessons.


The stuff we learn on UHH :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 2, 2015 17:38:36   #
G Brown Loc: Sunny Bognor Regis West Sussex UK
 
There is a theory that the growing of Rape seed (Yellow Fields of it) reduces rainfall in the area by causing strong thermals of heated air. Para gliders have learned to use the thermals from these fields to soar. Perhaps your yellow plane wings extenuate a localized mirage effect. If it was the field that was the cause the effect may have been more widespread

Reply
May 2, 2015 17:39:50   #
minniev Loc: MIssissippi
 
wdross wrote:
What you have is a type of Schlieren imaging or photography. "Schlieren photography is a visual process that is used to photograph the flow of fluids of varying density. Invented by the German physicist August Toepler in 1864 to study supersonic motion, it is widely used in in aeronautical engineering to photograph the flow of air around objects." (Quote from Wikipedia - I just could not state it better) Think of the "bubbles" of air coming off that field like they were low density marbles and you are shooting through the marbles. With a strong enough breeze, the "bubbles" get broken up and smoothed out no matter what the "heat".
What you have is a type of Schlieren imaging or ph... (show quote)


So someone has done this kind of thing on purpose instead of by accident? How interesting! thanks... I am still wondering if the dusting had something to do with it - if whatever they were spraying was a temperature different from the air. One I shot about an hour later of a duster flying over an area that had no crops to make a turn (and not spraying) did not turn out all shimmery. I guess it could have been the angle or height too...

Reply
May 2, 2015 21:46:45   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JD750 wrote:
That looks to me like the shimmering caused by heated air rising on a hot summer day. It's a common atmospheric phenomenon.


Hot runway surface, cool air. Does look like heat ripples.

Reply
 
 
May 3, 2015 06:30:05   #
Psergel Loc: New Mexico
 
JD750 wrote:
That looks to me like the shimmering caused by heated air rising on a hot summer day. It's a common atmospheric phenomenon.


Yep

Reply
May 3, 2015 06:45:25   #
Edmund Dworakowski
 
Diffraction !

Reply
May 3, 2015 06:56:27   #
Yooper 2 Loc: Ironwood, MI
 
It's caused by heat effects in the atmosphere and light refraction. Your camera probably can't compensate for this effect.

Reply
May 3, 2015 07:00:18   #
BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA
 
minniev wrote:
Took this yesterday and cannot figure out what could have caused the wave effect, which is something like would happen if I applied a weird "frosted glass" effect in software. Trying to isolate whether camera, owner or environmental problem.

Shot with Olympus EM1, 1/2000, 6.7 ISO 400, 75-300 lens fully extended handheld. I shot other sequences both before and after with this same lens and with other lenses, at similar and different settings with none of this bizarre trouble.

I had just attached this lens for these shots but there was no message of lens error or odd readings like there usually are if a lens for some reason did not lock in.

It was not particularly hot, low 70's. Only variable I could even wonder about was whether what the crop duster was spewing out (which smelled like anhydrous ammonia) could have had some effect or there was some particulate in it, but they are cropdusting all over and I didn't see this in any other shots.
Took this yesterday and cannot figure out what cou... (show quote)


Ground heating is causing the shimmer.

Reply
 
 
May 3, 2015 07:40:56   #
minniev Loc: MIssissippi
 
I've now googled heat shimmer in photography and found examples that look a lot like this. I'm still astounded I haven't run into it before, simply by accident. Apparently some people try to get this effect deliberately. I even found a tutorial showing how to counteract it in shooting planes by using panning. Thanks to all who helped me learn something new.

Reply
May 3, 2015 07:52:14   #
Bultaco Loc: Aiken, SC
 
JD750 wrote:
That looks to me like the shimmering caused by heated air rising on a hot summer day. It's a common atmospheric phenomenon.


I agree heat waves, very common.

Reply
May 3, 2015 08:11:37   #
andrec1 Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
I live in the desert in Tucson. There is really no fix for heat waves unless you shoot early in the morning.

Reply
May 3, 2015 08:17:15   #
mjmjam Loc: Michigan
 
This looks like a crop duster spraying fertilizer. Maybe that is the problem

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.