brenz wrote:
I understand the larger opening of the aperture and the smaller F-stop number the more you can blur the background.
My question is how does the focal affect the it.
Brenz, let me simply answer your questions directly.
DoF is governed by aperture opening.
The larger the aperture, the shallower the dof.
Since DoF is governed by aperture, two lenses of the same aperture have the same exact dof regardless of focal length. In other words, a 500mm f4 lens has the exact same DoF as a 24-105 f4 zoom.
BUT, the minimum DoF (max blur) occurs at any lenses minimum focus distance. That min. focus distance is fairly constant relatve to the ratios of their focul lengths. Let me explain that, if that sounded of the wall! :lol:
A 50mm lens with a minimum focus distance of 1 foot, is relatve to a 200mm that will have a min. focus distance of 4 feet(4 times focul lenghth, 50mm x 4 = 200mm, hence 1 foot x 4 = 4 feet, or their relative min. focus distance ratio).
So a longer lenses does NOT produce a shallower DoF at the same f-stop.
The advantage of that longer lens is that if a 50mm lens at f4 has a shallow dof of say 1" at 2 feet away, a 500mm f4 lens will give the same DoF at 10 times that distance, or at 20 feet away, giving you a lot more working room.
Just the same way that with a 50mm macro lens you need to be right on top of a bug to get 1:1, a longer macro lens will give that same 1:1 with a much greater working distance.
Hope that helped a little?
Now I'll let others tell you if the longer lens will produce more or less visual compression or better or worse OOF, or Bokeh!! :lol:
SS