JohnSwanda wrote:
And Canon is the only brand of camera he could have gotten the shots with?
John, lets say any camera would get those shots, which all sports photographers know that's not true.
Then, this was one of the NHRA nationals, so there would have been a small army of Photogs down there. So WHY these shots??
Shooting time from start to finish was probably 2 seconds of shoot time.
Would you rather shoot that 2 seconds at 11fps or at 14fps?
This guy was moving that lens pretty darn fast from 200+ yards out to right in FRONT of him to past him. John, would YOU rather be rotating an 11 pound lens, OR would you rather be rotating an 8 pound lens?! Would you rather be taking those shots at 16mp or at 18mp?
Those couple of facts could make the difference between getting this sequence and being splashed all over the internet, or just being another also ran.
John, I shoot a Canon, but not because I always have, or am a Fanboy. For those very reasons I mentioned, I wanted to hedge my shooting bets. When something far superior comes out, I will sell my system and move on!!
John, I have no idea what you shoot and don't care, I just hope you too are hedging your bets carefully.
John, do you know what it's like to shoot sports with a 200mm f1.8 lens? Just so you know, if you don't shoot with a Canon, you will NEVER get the opportunity to even find out!!
After all, any camera will probably get the job done.
I suggest if your photography is SERIOUS you hedge your shooting bets. If not, it won't matter anyway!! :lol:
SS