Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Fine art photography
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 5, 2015 10:44:31   #
1Georgie Loc: nevada
 
ive always been interested in fine art, just haven't been able to find much information on it beside you tube. Does anyone knows of any books that you can recommend on this topic?

Thank you

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 10:54:44   #
Leitz Loc: Solms
 
1Georgie wrote:
ive always been interested in fine art, just haven't been able to find much information on it beside you tube. Does anyone knows of any books that you can recommend on this topic?

Thank you


I cannot recommend any books, but must say, the more time you spend reading what others have done, the less time you will have to do your own. (And the less likely you'll develop your own style.)

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 11:00:00   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
It's all in the eye of the beholder...

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2015 11:06:49   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
1Georgie wrote:
ive always been interested in fine art, just haven't been able to find much information on it beside you tube. Does anyone knows of any books that you can recommend on this topic?

Thank you


I like "Looking at Photographs" by John Szarkowski, who was a long-time Director of Photography at the New York Museum of Modern Art. It is a collection of 100 photographs from the museum's collection, including many of the great fine art photographers, with commentary on each.

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 11:07:18   #
Kuzano
 
1Georgie wrote:
ive always been interested in fine art, just haven't been able to find much information on it beside you tube. Does anyone knows of any books that you can recommend on this topic?

Thank you


I have a friend who passed away about a year ago, who spent his career in academia, teaching Art History, reaching department head status. In addition, he was an accomplished photographer in large format.

His advice to anyone who asked was to encourage budding photographers to study Art History, as well as photography. Seems a bit self serving until you viewed his photography.

So, you might want to do your searching with a "bent" toward the history of fine art by itself, and as related to photography.

Found this in a simple search on the web:

http://www.arthistoryarchive.com/arthistory/photography/

OPB (Oregon Public Broadcasting) offers this video (one hour) showing the history of photography on the Columbia River Gorge. It's a well done history of fine art photographers who visited the Columbia and photographed it's beauty. One of the best known, Carleton Watkins set up his darkroom tent along the banks of the Columbia and make his wet plates, exposed them, and then fixed the plates in the field. His work was well known and displayed. His work was destroyed when stored in a studio during the Great San Francisco Earthquake and Fire (as I recall).

In any event, the video on OPB is illustrative of Photography for Art as applied in the late 1800's in the PNW. The link to "The River They Saw" on OPB.

http://www.opb.org/television/programs/oregonexperience/segment/the-river-they-saw/

There are a lot of links on the OPB page that indicate many sources and books of fine art photography information.

Good luck on your search, and as Mike suggested... Look a bit more at Art History.

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 11:21:01   #
tsilva Loc: Arizona
 
You need to define "fine art". There are many types in photography (mostly by people that take crap pictures and then try to pass it off as "art")

What genre are you interested in?

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 11:29:16   #
nmachtiger
 
Google Alain Broit. He has written extensively on the subject here :http://luminous-landscape.com/

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2015 11:30:29   #
1Georgie Loc: nevada
 
Thanks everyone for the information. Very helpful

Reply
Mar 5, 2015 11:39:37   #
doduce Loc: Holly Springs NC
 
Kuzano wrote:
I have a friend who passed away about a year ago, who spent his career in academia, teaching Art History, reaching department head status. In addition, he was an accomplished photographer in large format.

His advice to anyone who asked was to encourage budding photographers to study Art History, as well as photography. Seems a bit self serving until you viewed his photography.

So, you might want to do your searching with a "bent" toward the history of fine art by itself, and as related to photography.

Found this in a simple search on the web:

http://www.arthistoryarchive.com/arthistory/photography/

OPB (Oregon Public Broadcasting) offers this video (one hour) showing the history of photography on the Columbia River Gorge. It's a well done history of fine art photographers who visited the Columbia and photographed it's beauty. One of the best known, Carleton Watkins set up his darkroom tent along the banks of the Columbia and make his wet plates, exposed them, and then fixed the plates in the field. His work was well known and displayed. His work was destroyed when stored in a studio during the Great San Francisco Earthquake and Fire (as I recall).

In any event, the video on OPB is illustrative of Photography for Art as applied in the late 1800's in the PNW. The link to "The River They Saw" on OPB.

http://www.opb.org/television/programs/oregonexperience/segment/the-river-they-saw/

There are a lot of links on the OPB page that indicate many sources and books of fine art photography information.

Good luck on your search, and as Mike suggested... Look a bit more at Art History.
I have a friend who passed away about a year ago, ... (show quote)


Nice response. Kudos.

Reply
Mar 6, 2015 09:47:35   #
emmons267 Loc: Arizona, Valley of the Sun
 
1Georgie wrote:
ive always been interested in fine art, just haven't been able to find much information on it beside you tube. Does anyone knows of any books that you can recommend on this topic?

Thank you


Fine art and photographic art are very different. I don't consider photographic art as fine art.

Reply
Mar 6, 2015 10:03:03   #
doduce Loc: Holly Springs NC
 
emmons267 wrote:
Fine art and photographic art are very different. I don't consider photographic art as fine art.


An interesting opinion, not held by all, I suspect. How about sharing with us your take on the difference?

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2015 10:08:42   #
flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
 
Kuzano wrote:
I have a friend who passed away about a year ago, who spent his career in academia, teaching Art History, reaching department head status. In addition, he was an accomplished photographer in large format.

His advice to anyone who asked was to encourage budding photographers to study Art History, as well as photography. Seems a bit self serving until you viewed his photography.

So, you might want to do your searching with a "bent" toward the history of fine art by itself, and as related to photography.

Found this in a simple search on the web:

http://www.arthistoryarchive.com/arthistory/photography/

OPB (Oregon Public Broadcasting) offers this video (one hour) showing the history of photography on the Columbia River Gorge. It's a well done history of fine art photographers who visited the Columbia and photographed it's beauty. One of the best known, Carleton Watkins set up his darkroom tent along the banks of the Columbia and make his wet plates, exposed them, and then fixed the plates in the field. His work was well known and displayed. His work was destroyed when stored in a studio during the Great San Francisco Earthquake and Fire (as I recall).

In any event, the video on OPB is illustrative of Photography for Art as applied in the late 1800's in the PNW. The link to "The River They Saw" on OPB.

http://www.opb.org/television/programs/oregonexperience/segment/the-river-they-saw/

There are a lot of links on the OPB page that indicate many sources and books of fine art photography information.

Good luck on your search, and as Mike suggested... Look a bit more at Art History.
I have a friend who passed away about a year ago, ... (show quote)


Thanks for posting this reply --- I'm always interested in learning something new.

Reply
Mar 6, 2015 10:08:45   #
emmons267 Loc: Arizona, Valley of the Sun
 
doduce wrote:
An interesting opinion, not held by all, I suspect. How about sharing with us your take on the difference?


Just running out the door...

The process to create the end results are what distinguishes them in my mind...
More to follow.

Reply
Mar 6, 2015 10:10:30   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
Our local Fine Arts community has a section devoted to photograhy
emmons267 wrote:
Just running out the door...

The process to create the end results are what distinguishes them in my mind...
More to follow.

Reply
Mar 6, 2015 10:22:13   #
doduce Loc: Holly Springs NC
 
emmons267 wrote:
Just running out the door...

The process to create the end results are what distinguishes them in my mind...
More to follow.


Great. Look forward to the discussion.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.