Newsbob wrote:
Check out photos of the new FF Sony lenses to be announced tomorrow (Friday) at the CP+ show. They are posted on the "sonyalpharumors" website.
The lenses are huge. Disproportionately massive. I've been waiting for a Sony FF superwide zoom, and was looking forward to the new 24-240mm. Until I saw the picture of it this morning. It's so big as to remove all the advantages of the A7 in terms of size and weight.
The idea of the Sony A7 line has been great. But the lenses, not so much. Very limited selection, high prices, and now, very bulky.
I'm glad I kept my Canon gear while waiting for a good, all purpose Sony zoom. I may have made a mistake with Sony, and recommend that you think long and hard before committing.
Check out photos of the new FF Sony lenses to be a... (
show quote)
Thanks, Newsbob. I'm in no hurry, and very much inclined to stick with my 5Dii and have the a6000 as my back-up.
photosarah wrote:
Thanks, Newsbob. I'm in no hurry, and very much inclined to stick with my 5Dii and have the a6000 as my back-up.
That made sense to me too. I opted to keep both. I use both in different ways and situations. I like having options.
I have owned an a6000 for less than two months. It has some features better than mirrored bodies, some worse, some just different.
Overall, I see the differences as both a benefit and an opportunity to extend my range of knowledge with both mirrorless technology and photography in general. So far, I enjoy both systems. The biggest limitation with the a6000 is me.
This camera fills a niche for me. The big stuff is staying for now.
machia wrote:
C
Full frame to a smaller sensor will only affect image quality if you do large prints. Larger sensors allow pixels to function better in general, but if you are displaying images on computer screens etc., there will be no noticeable drop in quality, unless you went w/ a cheap point and shoot w/ plastic glass. Sony makes good cameras, inheriting Minolta optics and electronics. Speaking of which, I tested my old Minolta-Rokkor lenses against Leica Summicron, Nikon and Canon and my Rokkors were in some cases better. Rokkor built lenses for Leica, so that gives you an idea of how good Minolta was.
C br br Full frame to a smaller sensor will only ... (
show quote)
7d is an Aps-c sensor, same size as a6000 sensor
bobsea wrote:
Should i sell my canon 7d and lenses and go for sony a6000 and lenses
Will my pics excede the ones from the 7d
Im looking to have a smaller kit to carry around
Same size sensor although Sony has a few more MP's, so image quality probably comparable. If you want better image quality, move up to Sony full frame A7 series.
I have the A6000 with the 18-200 lens and have never been happier. I had Nikon 5000, Cannon SL1 and Panasonic lumix. Yes they are limited on their lenses I will give you that but with the adapter I can use cannon lenses so no worries. All depends on your wants and needs.
SonnyE wrote:
I'm going to change my shorts.
I think I'll go for some blue ones instead of the "tighty whities".
:lol:
You only need to please yourself. ;)
Enjoy! :-D
Sonny where do you get this stuff? :lol: :lol: :lol:
I have a Canon SL1 and with a 24mm pancake lens, it is a very compact unit that travels well. My Sony a7r with 35mm lens is wonderful as well, but for some reason I don't like electronic viewfinders. I use the Sony for large, detailed landscape shots. Of course I also have a 6d and 70d for special needs (low light, action) but for general stuff my little Canon SL1 gets the most use.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.