Thombar wrote:
I'm somewhat confused about the workflow when doing pp.
I have the Photoshop CC subscription with LR & PS. PS further has Camera raw and Bridge. If I start pp'ing with LR do I need to use Camera raw? Should I load all my photos into Bridge? Then what would be the order of use? I shoot almost 100% in RAW mode. Should all photos start with LR then go to Camera raw? Would love to know how you guys and gals run your post processing.
Thanks and enjoy the games today.
Here is my variation of the workflow.
1. I make unique folders in the camera for each session. This avoids LR taking all that time to read the entire card.
2. Copy the folders to HDD. Use Explorer or Finder depending upon your computer. I have a master folder called Photos. I file by year, month (01 January, 2015), and finally by session name.
3. In LR, I right click on the year or month folder and synchronize.
4. Delete from LR and HDD the obvious garbage.
5. I flag the unwanted shots as rejected using the X key. I also turn on automatic advance. Painter is a good tool but to be efficient, the thumbnails become to small for me.
6. Select the rejects and move them to a subfolder called Rejects.
7. Assign keywords to the good shots.
8. Now that the housekeeping is done, I edit. If the shot is ok but not worth editing, I give it a 1 star. Edited shots get a 4 so I know they are done. Shots to be printed get 5's. You can use colors or other numbers instead of these. I usually have a few leftovers that now go to the Rejects folder. I edit about 95% of my work in LR. The rest go into PS. The only plug-in I use is Nik's dFine because it does an excellent job of taming noise. The radial filter is better than Viveza. Therefore, LR 5 is a must have.
9. To share pictures immediately, I simply email them right out of LR. Very convenient.
10. I also export for email and printing in which cases, I have separate subfolders called "JPG's for email" and "JPG's for printing".
I have thought about using sidecars, xmp files, to store the edit information and dng's but see no benefit from either. I use PS because it is a 16-bit editor compatible with my raw's and the interface with LR is seamless. However, PSE is an excellent alternative with a better user-interface but is only 8-bit.
Good luck and happy editing.