Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Problem solved: Batteries in Canon 7D mark ii going dead over night
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Nov 12, 2014 10:27:25   #
billgdyoung Loc: Big Bear City, CA
 
gym wrote:
Well........... I think I found the problem, but now I have another one. When I received the Mark ii last week I had just purchased a Tamron 24-70 because I needed a 2.8 over that range. I loved the photos I was getting with the Tamron, so I left it on the new camera as the 'every day' lens.

In searching for a solution to the battery drain, I ran across a reference somewhere that mentioned the possibility of a lens shorting out and draining a camera battery. So I removed the Tamron and put on a Canon 70-200 instead. This morning there was NO measurable drop off in battery power.

Now I have another problem. Though the Tamron performs beautifully with regard to photo quality, will the use of it cause any damage to the camera?

I have an email in to Tamron to see about a possible repair but as yet I have no response.

UPDATE: I just found a discussion board where others have had a similar problem with this lens. Bummer.

I can't post the link because the thread will be moved. But if you google the terms 'Tamron 24-70 battery drain' it will take you to the site.
Well........... I think I found the problem, but n... (show quote)


Nice work on finding the current drain... and I have a 6D that would drain the battery in just a couple of days... turns out that it was the internal GPS hunting even though the camera was turned off and in the bag. Turning off the GPS function solved my 6D problem...

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 10:48:26   #
Dick Z. Loc: Downers Grove IL
 
gym wrote:
Well........... I think I found the problem, but now I have another one. When I received the Mark ii last week I had just purchased a Tamron 24-70 because I needed a 2.8 over that range. I loved the photos I was getting with the Tamron, so I left it on the new camera as the 'every day' lens.

In searching for a solution to the battery drain, I ran across a reference somewhere that mentioned the possibility of a lens shorting out and draining a camera battery. So I removed the Tamron and put on a Canon 70-200 instead. This morning there was NO measurable drop off in battery power.

Now I have another problem. Though the Tamron performs beautifully with regard to photo quality, will the use of it cause any damage to the camera?

I have an email in to Tamron to see about a possible repair but as yet I have no response.

UPDATE: I just found a discussion board where others have had a similar problem with this lens. Bummer.

I can't post the link because the thread will be moved. But if you google the terms 'Tamron 24-70 battery drain' it will take you to the site.
Well........... I think I found the problem, but n... (show quote)


I agree with Jerry. Send it to Tamron and let them fix it or repair it. Most Tamron lenses have a 6 year warrantee. Most Tamron's are sharp and well made. I have a 17x35mm that's very sharp. Good luck.

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 11:31:26   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
gym wrote:
Well........... I think I found the problem, but now I have another one. When I received the Mark ii last week I had just purchased a Tamron 24-70 because I needed a 2.8 over that range. I loved the photos I was getting with the Tamron, so I left it on the new camera as the 'every day' lens.

In searching for a solution to the battery drain, I ran across a reference somewhere that mentioned the possibility of a lens shorting out and draining a camera battery. So I removed the Tamron and put on a Canon 70-200 instead. This morning there was NO measurable drop off in battery power.

Now I have another problem. Though the Tamron performs beautifully with regard to photo quality, will the use of it cause any damage to the camera?

I have an email in to Tamron to see about a possible repair but as yet I have no response.

UPDATE: I just found a discussion board where others have had a similar problem with this lens. Bummer.

I can't post the link because the thread will be moved. But if you google the terms 'Tamron 24-70 battery drain' it will take you to the site.
Well........... I think I found the problem, but n... (show quote)


So how does saving the additional cost of the OEM lens look now! Not to be a smart xxx, but this is just one additional reason to stick with oem, where that is possible!

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2014 12:37:55   #
gpeters25 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX 78418
 
I have a similar problem I believe. I have a Canon Rebel SL1 and a Tamron Lens 18-270mm. My battery (and I have tried four different batteries) goes dead in about 3-5 days even though the camera is OFF. Any other thoughts?

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 13:12:24   #
Bill Emmett Loc: Bow, New Hampshire
 
jerryc41 wrote:
That sounds pretty definite. I'd send it to Tamron, since it's under warranty. Let us know how this turns out.


Gerry is absolutely right on this one. Your Tamron lens is under the Tamron warranty of 6 years. You may as well give Tamron a phone call, you will anyway to get a RMA number, and have them email you the return form. You will also have to give them information about your camera. They will fix the lens, and program the chip for your specific camera body. They also have a 3 day turn around. You'll also find out what the problem was, and any other things that may have been wrong or adjusted inside the lens. Don't waste any more time writing the forum, just get it off to Tamron. I own one of these lenses, it is a great lens.

B

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 14:32:40   #
rocketride Loc: Upstate NY
 
Bill Houghton wrote:
Depending on who you bought it from, they just might exchange it. If you only got it last week.


Does it appear to be a characteristic of the model or just certain units?

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 15:40:08   #
gym Loc: Athens, Georgia
 
cjc2 wrote:
So how does saving the additional cost of the OEM lens look now! Not to be a smart xxx, but this is just one additional reason to stick with oem, where that is possible!


I still have the better deal. I have an extra thousand dollars in my pocket and a lens that gives me great photographic performance. It just uses batteries. I plan to get that issue addressed, but if I don't, it's still a keeper.

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2014 16:17:04   #
davidk2020 Loc: San Diego
 
RichardSM wrote:
And yet another reason why not stay with Canon and it's own products? That's why I don't purchase 3rd party manufacturer's products QC is not very good some of the time or more time than not?


I don't think you can call it a QC issue if every single copy malfunctions in the same way.

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 16:23:58   #
davidrb Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
 
gym wrote:
Well........... I think I found the problem, but now I have another one. When I received the Mark ii last week I had just purchased a Tamron 24-70 because I needed a 2.8 over that range. I loved the photos I was getting with the Tamron, so I left it on the new camera as the 'every day' lens.

In searching for a solution to the battery drain, I ran across a reference somewhere that mentioned the possibility of a lens shorting out and draining a camera battery. So I removed the Tamron and put on a Canon 70-200 instead. This morning there was NO measurable drop off in battery power.

Now I have another problem. Though the Tamron performs beautifully with regard to photo quality, will the use of it cause any damage to the camera?

I have an email in to Tamron to see about a possible repair but as yet I have no response.

UPDATE: I just found a discussion board where others have had a similar problem with this lens. Bummer.

I can't post the link because the thread will be moved. But if you google the terms 'Tamron 24-70 battery drain' it will take you to the site.
Well........... I think I found the problem, but n... (show quote)


A phone call to Canon USA tech support might be a worth while effort. The last thing you want is an electrical problem in a new camera. Electrics is what these things are all about. Think about all the little electrics running around in your camera, then add the speed at which they are running, and you have a lot of stuff going on. One device may contaminate another, or at least effect it.

Hope this is not the case for you, but it won't cost to find out. GL. and hope for thew best.

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 16:40:32   #
rocketride Loc: Upstate NY
 
gpeters25 wrote:
I have a similar problem I believe. I have a Canon Rebel SL1 and a Tamron Lens 18-270mm. My battery (and I have tried four different batteries) goes dead in about 3-5 days even though the camera is OFF. Any other thoughts?


The test is to store the camera with another lens, or no lens, attached and see if the battery goes dead as quickly. The normal state for pretty much any current camera powered by a Li-Ion pack is no detectable drain over weeks (unless you leave the GPS or WiFi unit-- neither of which the SL-1 has-- turned on).

I haven't been using either of those on my 6D because they suck the batteries down something fierce. Even without those drains, it doesn't get better than about 2/3 of the stated battery life-- so I got a vertical grip and extra batteries.

I also have an SL-1, which I really love. It's about like (in terms of weight) walking around with one of my old OM-1s.

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 16:46:42   #
gpeters25 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX 78418
 
Thanks for your comments. Helpfull

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2014 17:03:57   #
RichardSM Loc: Back in Texas
 
I do think you can make it a QC issue with tamron lens with a few models of Canon cameras, there are on other sites forums that this is a problem!


davidk2020 wrote:
I don't think you can call it a QC issue if every single copy malfunctions in the same way.

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 17:44:36   #
davidk2020 Loc: San Diego
 
RichardSM wrote:
I do think you can make it a QC issue with tamron lens with a few models of Canon cameras, there are on other sites forums that this is a problem!


I see you misunderstood what I was trying to say. If every one of them exhibits the same problem, it's a design/engineering/production problem, not poor QC. They functioned as intended and were defective by design, not for lack of quality control.

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 19:33:56   #
RichardSM Loc: Back in Texas
 
davidk2020 wrote:
I see you misunderstood what I was trying to say. If every one of them exhibits the same problem, it's a design/engineering/production problem, not poor QC. They functioned as intended and were defective by design, not for lack of quality control.


Well the way QC worked at the company I work for 31 years it checked for all possible way that things should work for many different products so I guess other companies do it differently.

Reply
Nov 13, 2014 00:52:20   #
rocketride Loc: Upstate NY
 
RichardSM wrote:
Well the way QC worked at the company I work for 31 years it checked for all possible way that things should work for many different products so I guess other companies do it differently.


But even when you do that, it can only be done with all the other products that exist at the time you're designing and testing yours. Then someone will come up with one that works a little differently and which will 'screw' your product.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.