Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Real estate photos
Jul 5, 2014 11:18:56 #
Jul 5, 2014 11:24:21 #
Glad you're here. You'll find lots of help at UHH. You might try posting this question in the Main Photography forum, you're in the Introduce yourself section. You'll get plenty of answers from Canon folks there. I'm a Nikon guy and don't pretend to know the answer! Enjoy your time at the Hog.
Jul 5, 2014 11:28:58 #
Probably not, unless you were looking for the distortion that an 8 mm fisheye provides. Also, if you use the pop up strobe, consider a flash diffuser like Gary Fong's Puffer, or with an external strobe, his Lightsphere. Softens the light, diffuseness the flash throughout the image without any harshness.
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Jul 5, 2014 11:29:14 #
Jul 5, 2014 11:32:45 #
Big Bill
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
jim017 wrote:
Is there a better set up for shooting interiors than the Canon 10-22 ?
There is another technique for interior shots: panorama.
Take several overlapping shots, and stitch them together, using something like :
http://www.arcsoft.com/media/pmk/?gclid=CjkKEQjwxN6dBRDavZLpufuu9L8BEiQA4Vx1b2lRPSM-9gGNmM3egOpzsWht-TFW5zVNa-3HWRN-E-Xw_wcB
Just as an example, not an endorsement.
Jul 5, 2014 12:04:29 #
Jul 5, 2014 12:07:23 #
I know, but is the quality of the 6d with the the 16-35 going to make a noticeable difference?
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Jul 5, 2014 12:07:51 #
amehta
Loc: Boston
jim017 wrote:
Is there a better set up for shooting interiors than the Canon 10-22 ?
Using a tripod, taking a series of pictures at different angles, and stitching them together for a panoramic may be better, because there would be less distortion. With an ultra wide angle lens like the Canon 10-22mm, you want to be very careful to keep the lens horizontal, otherwise vertical lines will be tilted.
Jul 5, 2014 12:09:00 #
amehta
Loc: Boston
jim017 wrote:
I know, but is the quality of the 6d with the the 16-35 going to make a noticeable difference?
Are these going to be posted on the web (no difference), or printed for display (some difference)?
Jul 5, 2014 12:09:27 #
Jul 5, 2014 12:15:10 #
amehta
Loc: Boston
jim017 wrote:
Both.
As you start getting larger prints, like 16x20" or 20x30", the full frame sensor starts to separate itself in terms of image quality. Also, if you need to push past ISO 800, the full frame sensor also does better. The other side is dollars and size/weight, obviously.
Jul 5, 2014 12:46:19 #
Jul 5, 2014 12:57:07 #
amehta
Loc: Boston
jim017 wrote:
Thanks. most of the prints will be less than 8x10.
Then I think the APS-C camera with the 10-22mm lens will do very well.
Jul 5, 2014 13:10:51 #
jim017 wrote:
Is there a better set up for shooting interiors than the Canon 10-22 ?
Jim, welcome to the hog,
YES
Wide is not always the answer. Composition is the answer. You don't need to get everything in a room, to show off the room. You need to present the key elements of a room correctly to create the illusion of presentation.
Study the interior works of guys like Giddings and Shulman, they rarely go wall to wall.
Anyway Jim, though expensive, you might also look at a TS-E 17. Going much wider and you'll get excessive barrel.
Though you asked about lenses, at least three RT speed-lights could go a long ways as well.
Again, welcome and good luck. ;-)
SS
Jul 5, 2014 13:35:59 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.