Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
ISO = I-S-O or "eyeso"?
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
May 4, 2014 17:25:25   #
kanap Loc: Southwest Florida
 
I hear this term pronounced both ways on commercial and You Tube videos; as individual letters (I S O) and also as if it were a word (eyeso). Is there a correct or preferred pronunciation?

Reply
May 4, 2014 17:36:08   #
mechengvic Loc: SoCalo
 
kanap wrote:
I hear this term pronounced both ways on commercial and You Tube videos; as individual letters (I S O) and also as if it were a word (eyeso). Is there a correct or preferred pronunciation?


ISO is a system of rating the light sensitivity of film (and now digital sensors) that was established by the International Organization for Standardization. So technically the term ISO is an acronym. I pronounce it I-S-O.

Reply
May 4, 2014 18:08:28   #
Swamp Gator Loc: Coastal South Carolina
 
Huh, interesting.
I don't think I ever heard anybody try to make it a word before and pronounce it eyeso.
But then again I don't remember anyone ever calling ASA assa either.

Reply
 
 
May 4, 2014 18:26:05   #
lotus1967 Loc: Greater Cincinnati
 
Can anyone explain how/why ISO differs from ASA? Is a digital/film thing, or just a different standard that gained greater, and finally universal acceptance?

Reply
May 4, 2014 18:43:03   #
mechengvic Loc: SoCalo
 
lotus1967 wrote:
Can anyone explain how/why ISO differs from ASA? Is a digital/film thing, or just a different standard that gained greater, and finally universal acceptance?


ASA is the American Standards Association's measure of light sensitivity. Like you said, it's just a different form of the same thing.

Reply
May 4, 2014 18:43:06   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
lotus1967 wrote:
Can anyone explain how/why ISO differs from ASA? Is a digital/film thing, or just a different standard that gained greater, and finally universal acceptance?


Lotus, Welcome to the Hog.
The scale iteself, does not differ, only the international body that controls the std.
Lotus, I use I.S.O., but only cause that's how I learned it.
One of my professors, whom is one of the highest level Photogs I've ever come across, uses the word, as do a few others of his ilk. So what's,"high level"? There is not one photographer on here, whom at some point, has not seen his work. So I take that as pretty authoritve.
So neither way would be considered wrong by me. ;-)
SS

Reply
May 4, 2014 19:15:42   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
kanap wrote:
I hear this term pronounced both ways on commercial and You Tube videos; as individual letters (I S O) and also as if it were a word (eyeso). Is there a correct or preferred pronunciation?


In between ISO and ASA was DIN The numbers, 25,32,100 etc-etc meant the same thing but the acronyms referred to different measuring orginizations.

Reply
 
 
May 4, 2014 19:19:51   #
mechengvic Loc: SoCalo
 
boberic wrote:
In between ISO and ASA was DIN The numbers, 25,32,100 etc-etc meant the same thing but the acronyms referred to different measuring orginizations.


I remember DIN!!! That was waaay back! I think DIN may have even come before either ASA or ISO...

Reply
May 4, 2014 19:41:17   #
Db7423 Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
Setting a digital camera at ISO 400, for example, would give the sensor the same light sensivity or light capturing capacity as loading ASA 400 film in a film camera. The numbers have the same value. ;)

Reply
May 4, 2014 19:47:00   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
mechengvic wrote:
I remember DIN!!! That was waaay back! I think DIN may have even come before either ASA or ISO...


Victor, DIN is just another standard that's used, I believe it's German, but i see it used mostly in Europeon products. It's still used in some industries, whose products reach our shores. ;-)
SS

Reply
May 4, 2014 22:06:03   #
kanap Loc: Southwest Florida
 
boberic wrote:
In between ISO and ASA was DIN The numbers, 25,32,100 etc-etc meant the same thing but the acronyms referred to different measuring orginizations.


What does that have to do with the OP?

Reply
 
 
May 4, 2014 22:11:14   #
mechengvic Loc: SoCalo
 
kanap wrote:
What does that have to do with the OP?


OP's tend to get expanded upon by the multiple entities who find it interesting, although not all for the same reasons... It's the nature of the beast.

Reply
May 5, 2014 00:37:30   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Lotus, Welcome to the Hog.
The scale iteself, does not differ, only the international body that controls the std.
Lotus, I use I.S.O., but only cause that's how I learned it.
One of my professors, whom is one of the highest level Photogs I've ever come across, uses the word, as do a few others of his ilk. So what's,"high level"? There is not one photographer on here, whom at some point, has not seen his work. So I take that as pretty authoritve.
So neither way would be considered wrong by me. ;-)
SS
Lotus, Welcome to the Hog. br The scale iteself, ... (show quote)

ASA only goes to 12500 which equals ISO 12500. Actually ISO's above 10000 (including 12500 - 400000) are unofficial:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_speed

Reply
May 5, 2014 03:47:38   #
Pablo8 Loc: Nottingham UK.
 
I think you will get better pictures if you use I-S-O ,
or A-S-A.

Reply
May 5, 2014 03:50:05   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
Pablo8 wrote:
I think you will get better pictures if you use I-S-O ,
or A-S-A.

???

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.