I used mom and dads cameras but the first I bought was mid 60's a Ricoh Super 44 that I purchased used. Still have the camera and the Vivitar flash I purchased for it. Pictures I took are somewhere around here in the many boxes of photos and negs I have. Isn't digital wonderful?
You might want to check out
www.scancafe.com for slide scanning. At 29 cents a scan they are hard to beat and the quality was excellent. Price included color correction and removal of dust.....and you can decline 20% of the scans in not satisfied.
sbdrivr wrote:
You might want to check out
www.scancafe.com for slide scanning. At 29 cents a scan they are hard to beat and the quality was excellent. Price included color correction and removal of dust.....and you can decline 20% of the scans in not satisfied.
I don't mean to be negative (no pun intended) about scanning services, but by using a scanning service at $29 per hundred, a $200 scanner would be more than paid for after 700 slides are scanned and then you still have the scanner as a nice present to yourself. I bought the HP Scanjet 4050 for less than $200 and it processes 16 slides per scan and divides them into separate files. I am very happy with it. I do not work for HP...., but I do have about 4-5,000 slides and negs from my days as a drag racing photog in the late 60's and 70's. Now that I am retired, I will have time to convert them all to digital and catalog them. Phew! It makes me tired just thinking about it.
I agree about scanners. I have had great results with a Canoscan 4400 that cost only $85. Software allows great restoration and control, or just an auto mode. It can also rescue photos that are faded to a point with shades of red-orange. This 3x3 inch photo.
I have to agree that buying your own scanner for large volumes makes sense. I also have a Nikon Coolscan for 35mm slides. Scancafe is just one of many good labs if you only have a small quantity, or don't have the time to process that many images.
rivernan wrote:
I had a kodak instamatic too. I know I earned it and my memory tells me it was from collecting Bazooka Joe Bubble Gum comics/wrappers.
That's a lot of bubbles. 3 pencils with your name printed on them cost 125 wrappers, or 25c and 5 wrappers. I doubt if my entire neighborhood chewed that much in a year to get an Instamatic.....just pulling your chain
:mrgreen:
hamtrack wrote:
My Mother had a Kodak Box camera, but taking photos was not a priority with a depression economy. As I am sure many do, I went through a mountain of old photos that came from who knows where. My Mother took this one circa 1947. I broke this horse and others to ride in my youth. This is Nifty, a quarter horse that objected to me having the audacity to jump on his back, but I did eventually win out. I still have bone chip in my right ankle when he rode me into a fence post, attempting to rub me off.
My Mother had a Kodak Box camera, but taking photo... (
show quote)
This is a very good image from any box camera.
After reading messages from this excellent forum for many months,I came across this discussion of old cameras and I couldn't resist registering . My first camera was a Kodak Bantam that fit nicely in a pocket of my blue jeans while I was on deck of my carrier on the Pacific Ocean-- year was 1946- when a plane crashed into the ocean or something happened on the flight deck, that little Bantam was easy to fish out and take a picture. There was nothing to adjust- similar to today's "Point and shoot". I have no idea what the shutter speed was or what the lense aperture was !!! I remember I made sure when I took a picture of a plane landing to keep a 45 deg angle so it would not blur.I still have some of the pictures and I'm in the process of scanning and digitizing them.
billcoh wrote:
After reading messages from this excellent forum for many months,I came across this discussion of old cameras and I couldn't resist registering . My first camera was a Kodak Bantam that fit nicely in a pocket of my blue jeans while I was on deck of my carrier on the Pacific Ocean-- year was 1946- when a plane crashed into the ocean or something happened on the flight deck, that little Bantam was easy to fish out and take a picture. There was nothing to adjust- similar to today's "Point and shoot". I have no idea what the shutter speed was or what the lense aperture was !!! I remember I made sure when I took a picture of a plane landing to keep a 45 deg angle so it would not blur.I still have some of the pictures and I'm in the process of scanning and digitizing them.
After reading messages from this excellent forum f... (
show quote)
It would be nice to see your photos.
billcoh wrote:
After reading messages from this excellent forum for many months,I came across this discussion of old cameras and I couldn't resist registering . My first camera was a Kodak Bantam that fit nicely in a pocket of my blue jeans while I was on deck of my carrier on the Pacific Ocean-- year was 1946- when a plane crashed into the ocean or something happened on the flight deck, that little Bantam was easy to fish out and take a picture. There was nothing to adjust- similar to today's "Point and shoot". I have no idea what the shutter speed was or what the lense aperture was !!! I remember I made sure when I took a picture of a plane landing to keep a 45 deg angle so it would not blur.I still have some of the pictures and I'm in the process of scanning and digitizing them.
After reading messages from this excellent forum f... (
show quote)
Please post them when you get them ready. I was an airdale
(ADJ2) in the late 50's early 60's. Never got on a ship though. Spent 31/2 out of the four years at Pensacola. It was great duty but I regret never having got on a carrier.
Quote:
I was an airdale
(ADJ2) in the late 50's early 60's. Never got on a ship though. Spent 31/2 out of the four years at Pensacola. It was great duty but I regret never having got on a carrier.
I was also an airdale photographer. I was in on a kiddy cruise and spent two out of 3 years in Washington, DC. Not only was I never on a ship, I never even wanted to SEE a ship!
jackinkc wrote:
Quote:
I was an airdale
(ADJ2) in the late 50's early 60's. Never got on a ship though. Spent 31/2 out of the four years at Pensacola. It was great duty but I regret never having got on a carrier.
I was also an airdale photographer. I was in on a kiddy cruise and spent two out of 3 years in Washington, DC. Not only was I never on a ship, I never even wanted to SEE a ship!
The photography school was at Pensacola when I was there. Did you happen to go there?
dragonfist wrote:
jackinkc wrote:
Quote:
I was an airdale
(ADJ2) in the late 50's early 60's. Never got on a ship though. Spent 31/2 out of the four years at Pensacola. It was great duty but I regret never having got on a carrier.
I was also an airdale photographer. I was in on a kiddy cruise and spent two out of 3 years in Washington, DC. Not only was I never on a ship, I never even wanted to SEE a ship!
The photography school was at Pensacola when I was there. Did you happen to go there?
quote=jackinkc quote I was an airdale br (ADJ2) ... (
show quote)
I did go through Pensacola photography A school. I was a Kansas kid and I have to say that the two best seasons I had ever experienced were my first summer in San Diego and that winter in Pensacola. I was in the Navy from May, 54 to Jul, '57. Came out of the service a PO second class.
I went to the AF Photo school when it was in Denver. I had always heard the Navy's school was better.
GoofyNewfie wrote:
I went to the AF Photo school when it was in Denver. I had always heard the Navy's school was better.
I liked the Navy photo school. I don't know anything about the AF system, but I do recall that several Air Force me attended Navy camera repair and movie schools.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.